Overview of IEEE802.15.4g OFDM and its applicability to smart building applications

This paper compares the performance of two IEEE802.15.4 physical layers in the Smart Building context: 2.4 GHz O-QPSK and sub-GHz OFDM. The former has been in the IEEE802.15.4 standard since 2003, the latter was rolled into its 2015 revision. OFDM promises exceptional performance, in particular in environments with high external interference and multi-path fading. This paper starts with a comprehensive overview of IEEE802.15.4 and IEEE802.15.4g, with a particular focus on OFDM, its design drivers and modes of operation. The second half of this paper presents results from an exhaustive benchmarking campaign of both technologies in a building environment, and discusses lessons learnt. We show how OFDM has a higher range, even at 400 kbps and 800 kbps data rates. We then quantify the importance of frequency repetition in OFDM, and of using a wide communication channel, and we show how the use of OFDM can result in a 2–4 χ decrease in power consumption compared to 2.4 GHz O-QPSK. We conclude by recommending the use of OFDM option 1, with MCS2 for short (<128 B) frames, and MCS3 otherwise.

[1]  Ankur Mehta,et al.  Mitigating Multipath Fading through Channel Hopping in Wireless Sensor Networks , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[2]  Antonio Carrapatoso,et al.  Evaluation of an RPL/6LoWPAN/IEEE 802.15.4g solution for smart metering in an industrial environment , 2016, 2016 12th Annual Conference on Wireless On-demand Network Systems and Services (WONS).

[3]  Hiroshi Harada,et al.  Development and field experiment of wide area Wi-SUN system based on IEEE 802.15.4g , 2016, 2016 IEEE 3rd World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT).

[4]  Tim Winter,et al.  Routing Requirements for Urban Low-Power and Lossy Networks , 2009, RFC.

[5]  PROPAGATION DATA AND PREDICTION METHODS FOR THE PLANNING OF INDOOR RADIOCOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS AND RADIO LOCAL AREA NETWORKS IN THE FREQUENCY RANGE 900 MHz TO 100 GHz , 1997 .

[6]  Jerald Martocci,et al.  Building Automation Routing Requirements in Low-Power and Lossy Networks , 2010, RFC.

[7]  Eric Fleury,et al.  FIT IoT-LAB: A large scale open experimental IoT testbed , 2015, 2015 IEEE 2nd World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT).

[8]  Vlado Handziski,et al.  Industrial Wireless IP-Based Cyber –Physical Systems , 2016, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[9]  Philip Levis,et al.  RPL: IPv6 Routing Protocol for Low-Power and Lossy Networks , 2012, RFC.

[10]  Jakob Buron,et al.  Home Automation Routing Requirements in Low-Power and Lossy Networks , 2008, RFC.

[11]  Sangjae Lee,et al.  Implementation of IEEE 802.15.4g wireless communication platform for smart utility service , 2013, 2013 IEEE Third International Conference on Consumer Electronics ¿ Berlin (ICCE-Berlin).

[12]  Thomas Watteyne,et al.  Lessons learned from large-scale dense IEEE802.15.4 connectivity traces , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE).

[13]  Kristofer S. J. Pister,et al.  Industrial Routing Requirements in Low-Power and Lossy Networks , 2009, RFC.

[14]  Roberto Garello,et al.  Impact of Wi-Fi traffic on the IEEE 802.15.4 channels occupation in indoor environments , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Electromagnetics in Advanced Applications.

[15]  Thomas Watteyne,et al.  Industrial IEEE802.15.4e networks: Performance and trade-offs , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).