Radio-frequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) exposure levels in different European outdoor urban environments in comparison with regulatory limits.

BACKGROUND Concerns of the general public about potential adverse health effects caused by radio-frequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMFs) led authorities to introduce precautionary exposure limits, which vary considerably between regions. It may be speculated that precautionary limits affect the base station network in a manner that mean population exposure unintentionally increases. AIMS The objectives of this multicentre study were to compare mean exposure levels in outdoor areas across four different European cities and to compare with regulatory RF-EMF exposure levels in the corresponding areas. METHODS We performed measurements in the cities of Amsterdam (the Netherlands, regulatory limits for mobile phone base station frequency bands: 41-61 V/m), Basel (Switzerland, 4-6 V/m), Ghent (Belgium, 3-4.5 V/m) and Brussels (Belgium, 2.9-4.3 V/m) using a portable measurement device. Measurements were conducted in three different types of outdoor areas (central and non-central residential areas and downtown), between 2011 and 2012 at 12 different days. On each day, measurements were taken every 4s for approximately 15 to 30 min per area. Measurements per urban environment were repeated 12 times during 1 year. RESULTS Arithmetic mean values for mobile phone base station exposure ranged between 0.22 V/m (Basel) and 0.41 V/m (Amsterdam) in all outdoor areas combined. The 95th percentile for total RF-EMF exposure varied between 0.46 V/m (Basel) and 0.82 V/m (Amsterdam) and the 99th percentile between 0.81 V/m (Basel) and 1.20 V/m (Brussels). CONCLUSIONS All exposure levels were far below international reference levels proposed by ICNIRP (International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection). Our study did not find indications that lowering the regulatory limit results in higher mobile phone base station exposure levels.

[1]  Imrich Chlamtac,et al.  Dynamic periodic location area update in mobile networks , 2002, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol..

[2]  Georg Neubauer,et al.  Measurement setup and protocol for characterizing and testing radio frequency personal exposure meters , 2012, Bioelectromagnetics.

[3]  A. Ahlbom Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz) , 1998 .

[4]  Georg Neubauer,et al.  Temporal and spatial variability of personal exposure to radio frequency electromagnetic fields. , 2009, Environmental research.

[5]  R. Saunders,et al.  WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data , 2009 .

[6]  Reilly Jp Comments concerning "Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz)". , 1999 .

[7]  Györgyi Kubinyi,et al.  Personal RF exposimetry in urban area , 2008, Ann. des Télécommunications.

[8]  Elisabeth Cardis,et al.  Radiofrequency exposure in the French general population: band, time, location and activity variability. , 2009, Environment international.

[9]  Luc Martens,et al.  Conduct of a personal radiofrequency electromagnetic field measurement study: proposed study protocol , 2010, Environmental health : a global access science source.

[10]  G Berg-Beckhoff,et al.  Mobile phone base stations and adverse health effects: phase 1 of a population-based, cross-sectional study in Germany , 2008, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[11]  G Berg-Beckhoff,et al.  Mobile phone base stations and adverse health effects: phase 2 of a cross-sectional study with measured radio frequency electromagnetic fields , 2008, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[12]  E Cardis,et al.  Determinants of mobile phone output power in a multinational study: implications for exposure assessment , 2009, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[13]  Martin Röösli,et al.  Use of portable exposure meters for comparing mobile phone base station radiation in different types of areas in the cities of Basel and Amsterdam. , 2014, The Science of the total environment.

[14]  M. Röösli,et al.  Systematic review on the health effects of exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields from mobile phone base stations. , 2010, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[15]  M. Röösli,et al.  The prevalence of symptoms attributed to electromagnetic field exposure: a cross-sectional representative survey in Switzerland , 2006, Sozial- und Präventivmedizin.

[16]  Martin Röösli,et al.  Impact of one’s own mobile phone in stand-by mode on personal radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure , 2013, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[17]  Joe Wiart,et al.  Exposure induced by WCDMA mobiles phones in operating networks , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[18]  G. Thuróczy,et al.  Comparison of personal radio frequency electromagnetic field exposure in different urban areas across Europe. , 2010, Environmental research.

[19]  Luc Martens,et al.  CHARACTERIZATION OF PERSONAL RF ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD EXPOSURE AND ACTUAL ABSORPTION FOR THE GENERAL PUBLIC , 2008, Health physics.

[20]  Mona Shum,et al.  Factors that Influence the Radiofrequency Power Output of GSM Mobile Phones , 2007, Radiation research.

[21]  M. Egger,et al.  Statistical analysis of personal radiofrequency electromagnetic field measurements with nondetects , 2008, Bioelectromagnetics.

[22]  T. Eikelboom,et al.  Personal radiofrequency electromagnetic field measurements in The Netherlands: exposure level and variability for everyday activities, times of day and types of area. , 2012, Environment international.

[23]  H Kromhout,et al.  Geospatial modelling of electromagnetic fields from mobile phone base stations. , 2013, The Science of the total environment.

[24]  Joe Wiart,et al.  Feasibility of future epidemiological studies on possible health effects of mobile phone base stations , 2006, Bioelectromagnetics.