Automated Dynamic Modeling of Arbitrary Hybrid and Electric Drivetrain Topologies

The optimal design regarding energy efficiency of hybrid and electric drivetrains is a problem that includes topology generation, topology optimization, component sizing, and control. One of the challenges of this design problem is that the topology defines the plant sizing and control parameters. Furthermore, the topology also determines the transmission model that is needed for the evaluation of the sizing and control problems. To enable automated component sizing and control optimization, a novel method is presented in this paper for the automated dynamic modeling of arbitrary hybrid and electric drivetrain topologies. In this paper, topologies are modeled at the level of (planetary) gears and clutches, making the method suitable for complex and unconventional drivetrain topologies. A generic transmission model is defined, for which the model parameters are automatically determined. The parameter determination is based on the analytic evaluation of the kinematic and kinetic properties of the components of the topology. All transmission modes are identified and classified, and infeasible and redundant modes are automatically excluded. As the method is analytic, the computation time to determine the model parameters is short (less than a second). The model, in this case, provides the rotational speeds and torques of all power sources as a function of the rotational speed and torque at the wheels, and the control variables. Using a case study, it is shown that the method can be used to automatically solve the control and sizing problems for complex drivetrain topologies.

[1]  P.P.J. van den Bosch,et al.  Integrated energy & emission management for hybrid electric truck with SCR aftertreatment , 2010, 2010 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference.

[2]  Ferdinand Freudenstein,et al.  Kinematics and statics of a coupled epicyclic spur-gear train , 1972 .

[3]  Olle Sundström,et al.  Torque-Assist Hybrid Electric Powertrain Sizing: From Optimal Control Towards a Sizing Law , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[4]  Louise Travé-Massuyès,et al.  Non-causal versus causal qualitative modelling and simulation , 1993 .

[5]  Maarten Witters,et al.  Automatic Evaluation and Optimization of Generic Hybrid Vehicle Topologies using Dynamic Programming , 2017 .

[6]  Jacobus E. Rooda,et al.  A classification of methods for distributed system optimization based on formulation structure , 2009 .

[7]  Michael Bargende,et al.  Iterative refinement of the discretization of the Dynamic Programming State Grid , 2016 .

[8]  M Maarten Steinbuch,et al.  Optimal sizing of a series PHEV : comparison between convex optimization and particle Swarm optimization , 2015 .

[9]  Alberto Cerofolini,et al.  Benchmarking Hybrid Concepts: On-Line vs. Off-Line Fuel Economy Optimization for Different Hybrid Architectures , 2013 .

[10]  Goele Pipeleers,et al.  Model-based gearbox synthesis , 2014 .

[11]  Theo Hofman,et al.  Functional and Cost-Based Automatic Generator for Hybrid Vehicles Topologies , 2015, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[12]  Alex Serrarens,et al.  Optimal Control of the Gearshift Command for Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[13]  Olle Sundström,et al.  A generic dynamic programming Matlab function , 2009, 2009 IEEE Control Applications, (CCA) & Intelligent Control, (ISIC).

[14]  Lino Guzzella,et al.  Vehicle Propulsion Systems: Introduction to Modeling and Optimization , 2005 .

[15]  Viktor Larsson,et al.  Analytic Solutions to the Dynamic Programming Subproblem in Hybrid Vehicle Energy Management , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[16]  Nicolas Petit,et al.  Online Energy Management System (EMS) Including Engine and Catalyst Temperatures for a Parallel HEV , 2017 .

[17]  Shunsuke Fushiki,et al.  The New Generation Front Wheel Drive Hybrid System , 2016 .

[18]  Zoran Filipi,et al.  Computationally Efficient Combined Plant Design and Controller Optimization Using a Coupling Measure , 2012 .

[19]  Jing Sun,et al.  Automated Modeling and Mode Screening for Exhaustive Search of Double-Planetary-Gear Power Split Hybrid Powertrains , 2014 .

[20]  Wei Gao,et al.  Optimal component sizing for a parallel hybrid bus based on dynamic programming , 2014, 2014 IEEE Conference and Expo Transportation Electrification Asia-Pacific (ITEC Asia-Pacific).

[21]  Kristina Shea,et al.  Strategies for Topologic and Parametric Rule Application in Automated Design Synthesis Using Graph Grammars , 2014, DAC 2014.

[22]  M. James,et al.  The generalised inverse , 1978, The Mathematical Gazette.

[23]  Huei Peng,et al.  A systematic design approach for two planetary gear split hybrid vehicles , 2010 .

[24]  T. Hofman,et al.  Hybrid Vehicle Optimal Control: Linear Interpolation and Singular Control , 2014, 2014 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC).

[25]  A. Galip Ulsoy,et al.  Relationship between coupling and the controllability Grammian in co-design problems , 2015 .

[26]  Huei Peng,et al.  Optimal Control of Hybrid Electric Vehicles Based on Pontryagin's Minimum Principle , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[27]  A. Galip Ulsoy,et al.  Relationship between coupling and the controllability Grammian in co-design problems , 2010, Proceedings of the 2010 American Control Conference.

[28]  Mong-Li Lee,et al.  A Prime Number Labeling Scheme for Dynamic Ordered XML Trees , 2004, ICDE.

[29]  R. Penrose A Generalized inverse for matrices , 1955 .

[30]  Maarten Steinbuch,et al.  Review of Optimization Strategies for System-Level Design in Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.