Statistical property parameterization of simple rocking block response

The parametric representation of rocking fragilities is statistically investigated. Initially, the potential normalization of the rocking parameters to reduce the problem's dimensionality is tackled by undertaking comparisons both on a single‐record and a sample‐of‐records basis. It is found that the slenderness angle can be normalized out when probabilistically considering the rocking response of simple rocking blocks with the same semi‐diagonal length. Then, the robustness of the lognormal distribution for characterizing the rocking motion is investigated. Sets of pulse‐like and ordinary ground motions are employed to test the lognormal fit for the full range of rocking response when the peak ground acceleration or the peak ground velocity are employed as intensity measures. In both cases, the lognormal distribution offers an adequate, but often imperfect, baseline model of the rocking fragility curves. Instead, a shifted lognormal that accounts for the absence of response below the rocking initiation intensity is an enhanced solution that can form the basis for offering simplified response model surrogates.

[1]  D. Vamvatsikos,et al.  Seismic response distribution expressions for rocking building contents under ordinary ground motions , 2022, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[2]  D. Vamvatsikos,et al.  The influence of the vertical component of ground motion on the probabilistic treatment of the rocking response of free‐standing blocks , 2022, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics.

[3]  D. Vamvatsikos,et al.  Rocking incremental dynamic analysis , 2021, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics.

[4]  D. Vamvatsikos,et al.  Seismic response distribution expressions for on‐ground rigid rocking blocks under ordinary ground motions , 2021, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics.

[5]  C. Christopoulos,et al.  Finite element analysis of the seismic shake‐table response of a rocking podium structure , 2020, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics.

[6]  Michalis F. Vassiliou,et al.  Shake table testing of a rocking podium: Results of a blind prediction contest , 2020, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics.

[7]  You Dong,et al.  Seismic loss and resilience assessment of single-column rocking bridges , 2020, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[8]  A. Benavent‐Climent,et al.  New rocking column with control of negative stiffness displacement range and its application to RC frames , 2020 .

[9]  Ž. Nikolić,et al.  Experimental investigation of seismic behaviour of the ancient Protiron monument model , 2019, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics.

[10]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Seismic Fragility Functions via Nonlinear Response History Analysis , 2018, Journal of Structural Engineering.

[11]  N. Bićanić,et al.  Analysis of restitution in rocking of single rigid blocks , 2018, Acta Mechanica.

[12]  E. Dimitrakopoulos,et al.  Rocking amplification and strong‐motion duration , 2018 .

[13]  Michalis F. Vassiliou,et al.  Is rocking motion predictable? , 2018 .

[14]  Michalis F. Vassiliou,et al.  Comparative Assessment of Two Rocking Isolation Techniques for a Motorway Overpass Bridge , 2017, Front. Built Environ..

[15]  E. Dimitrakopoulos,et al.  Seismic Performance of Rocking Frames with Flag-Shaped Hysteretic Behavior , 2017 .

[16]  E. Dimitrakopoulos,et al.  Nonsmooth dynamic analysis of sticking impacts in rocking structures , 2017, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[17]  Elias G Dimitrakopoulos,et al.  Closed-form rocking overturning conditions for a family of pulse ground motions , 2016, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[18]  Sri Sritharan,et al.  Improved Coefficient of Restitution Estimation for Free Rocking Members , 2016 .

[19]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Size Versus Slenderness: Two Competing Parameters in the Seismic Stability of Free‐Standing Rocking Columns , 2016 .

[20]  Elias G. Dimitrakopoulos,et al.  Dimensionless fragility curves for rocking response to near‐fault excitations , 2015 .

[21]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Probabilistic Assessment of Rocking Response for Simply-Supported Rigid Blocks , 2015 .

[22]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Efficient Analytical Fragility Function Fitting Using Dynamic Structural Analysis , 2015 .

[23]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  An Efficient Algorithm to Identify Strong-Velocity Pulses in Multicomponent Ground Motions , 2014 .

[24]  Matthew J. DeJong,et al.  Dynamically equivalent rocking structures , 2014 .

[25]  I. Psycharis,et al.  Seismic reliability assessment of classical columns subjected to near‐fault ground motions , 2013, 1312.4484.

[26]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Planar rocking response and stability analysis of an array of free‐standing columns capped with a freely supported rigid beam , 2013 .

[27]  Elia Voyagaki,et al.  Rocking response and overturning criteria for free standing rigid blocks to single-lobe pulses , 2013 .

[28]  E. Dimitrakopoulos,et al.  Revisiting the rocking block: closed-form solutions and similarity laws , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[29]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Analysis of the rocking response of rigid blocks standing free on a seismically isolated base , 2012 .

[30]  Aníbal Costa,et al.  Assessment of the Statistical Distributions of Structural Demand Under Earthquake Loading , 2011 .

[31]  Jason Ingham,et al.  Effects of interface material on the performance of free rocking blocks , 2011 .

[32]  Katsu Goda,et al.  Probabilistic Characteristics of Seismic Ductility Demand of SDOF Systems with Bouc-Wen Hysteretic Behavior , 2009 .

[33]  Nick Gregor,et al.  NGA Project Strong-Motion Database , 2008 .

[34]  Paulo B. Lourenço,et al.  On the dynamics of rocking motion of single rigid‐block structures , 2007 .

[35]  Eduardo Miranda,et al.  Probabilistic estimation of maximum inelastic displacement demands for performance‐based design , 2007 .

[36]  Richard H. McCuen,et al.  Improved probabilistic quantification of drift demands for seismic evaluation , 2007 .

[37]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Direct estimation of the seismic demand and capacity of oscillators with multi‐linear static pushovers through IDA , 2006 .

[38]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Evaluation of Peak Ground Velocity as a “Good” Intensity Measure for Near-Source Ground Motions , 2004 .

[39]  Nicos Makris,et al.  The rocking spectrum and the limitations of practical design methodologies , 2003 .

[40]  Ioannis N. Psycharis,et al.  Experimental investigation of the earthquake response of a model of a marble classical column , 2002 .

[41]  J. Lemos,et al.  Numerical prediction of the earthquake response of classical columns using the distinct element method , 2002 .

[42]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis , 2002 .

[43]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Rocking Response of Free-Standing Blocks under Cycloidal Pulses , 2001 .

[44]  H Y Kim,et al.  STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF FRAGILITY CURVES , 2000 .

[45]  Ioannis N. Psycharis,et al.  Parametric investigation of the stability of classical columns under harmonic and earthquake excitations , 2000 .

[46]  Nicos Makris,et al.  Rocking response of rigid blocks under near-source ground motions , 2000 .

[47]  Eduardo Miranda,et al.  Evaluation of site-dependent inelastic seismic design spectra , 1993 .

[48]  Pol D. Spanos,et al.  Rocking of Rigid Blocks Due to Harmonic Shaking , 1984 .

[49]  Yuji Ishiyama,et al.  Motions of rigid bodies and criteria for overturning by earthquake excitations , 1982 .

[50]  M. J. N. Priestley,et al.  SEISMIC RESPONSE OF STRUCTURES FREE TO ROCK ON THEIR FOUNDATIONS , 1978 .

[51]  H. Lilliefors On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Normality with Mean and Variance Unknown , 1967 .

[52]  G. Housner The behavior of inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes , 1963 .

[53]  J. Penzien,et al.  Rocking response of rigid blocks to earthquakes , 1980 .

[54]  A. Veletsos,et al.  Effect of Inelastic Behavior on the Response of Simple Systems to Earthquake Motions , 1975 .