Explore, Experiment, Experience: A Synthesis of Vickers’ Appreciative Learning System and Ackoff’s Problem Approach Applied in Practice

This chapter will explore the application of a problem-structuring approach which synthesizes Vickers’ concept of ‘appreciation’, Bateson’s learning spirals and Ackoff’s approach to dealing with problems. This problem-structuring approach involves three elements: explore, experiment, experience. The chapter describes, as an example, a case study taken from a UK unitary authority (anonymized for convenience) in which attempts were made to improve project performance using this approach. The organization commissioned projects across multiple disciplines, for example, transport schemes, constructions, change programs, business improvements using IT and bridge replacements but was rated as poor at project management by successive internal and external reviews. Some conclusions are offered about the application of problem-structuring in order to learn lessons and promote good practice for the future.

[1]  Mark Winter,et al.  Directions for future research in project management: The main findings of a UK government-funded research network , 2006 .

[2]  K. Boulding,et al.  Value Systems and Social Process. , 1971 .

[3]  G. Vickers The Art of Judgment: A Study of Policy Making , 1995 .

[4]  Russell L. Ackoff,et al.  Creating the Corporate Future: Plan or be Planned For , 1981 .

[5]  Ralph Stacey,et al.  Managing the unknowable : strategic boundaries between order and chaos in organizations , 1992 .

[6]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  The rise of knowledge towards attention management , 2001, J. Knowl. Manag..

[7]  Janice Thomas,et al.  Preparing project managers to deal with complexity–advanced project management education , 2008, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[8]  Harold Kerzner Value-Driven Project Management , 2009 .

[9]  Peter W. G. Morris,et al.  Reconstructing Project Management: Morris/Reconstructing Project Management , 2013 .

[10]  H. Simon,et al.  Rational choice and the structure of the environment. , 1956, Psychological review.

[11]  W. Duncan A GUIDE TO THE PROJECT MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE , 1996 .

[12]  John D. W. Morecroft,et al.  The feedback view of business policy and strategy , 1985 .

[13]  Harvey Maylor,et al.  And then came complex project management (revised) , 2009 .

[14]  Sue Holwell,et al.  Information, Systems and Information Systems: Making Sense of the Field , 1998 .

[15]  Roger Atkinson,et al.  Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria , 1999 .

[16]  R. Stacey Complexity and Creativity in Organizations , 1996 .

[17]  Peter M. Bednar,et al.  A Contextual Integration of Individual and Organizational Learning Perspectives as Part of IS Analysis , 2000, Informing Sci. Int. J. an Emerg. Transdiscipl..

[18]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Lost Roots: How Project Management Came to Emphasize Control over Flexibility and Novelty , 2010 .

[19]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[20]  Lynn Crawford,et al.  Fundamental uncertainties in projects and the scope of project management , 2006 .

[21]  R. Ackoff,et al.  Redesigning the Future, a Systems Approach to Societal Problems , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[22]  Peter W. G. Morris,et al.  Practitioner development: From trained technicians to reflective practitioners , 2006 .

[23]  Terry Cooke-Davies,et al.  The “real” success factors on projects , 2002 .

[24]  Russell L. Ackoff,et al.  Systems thinking and thinking systems , 1994 .

[25]  P. Bednar,et al.  Individual Emergence in Contextual Analysis , 2001 .

[26]  Enid Mumford,et al.  The story of socio‐technical design: reflections on its successes, failures and potential , 2006, Inf. Syst. J..

[27]  Derek H.T. Walker,et al.  Rethinking project management , 2016 .

[28]  L. Bertalanffy AN OUTLINE OF GENERAL SYSTEM THEORY , 1950, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[29]  Maria Kapsali,et al.  Equifinality in Project Management Exploring Causal Complexity in Projects , 2013 .

[30]  Peter W. G. Morris,et al.  Reconstructing Project Management , 2013 .