Mono‐block and non‐matching multi‐block structured mesh adaptation based on aerodynamic functional total derivatives for RANS flow

Summary An enhanced goal-oriented mesh adaptation method is presented based on aerodynamic functional total derivatives with respect to mesh nodes in a Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) finite-volume mono-block and non-matching multi-block-structured grid framework. This method falls under the category of methods involving the adjoint vector of the function of interest. The contribution of a Spalart–Allmaras turbulence model is taken into account through its linearization. Meshes are adapted accordingly to the proposed indicator. Applications to 2D RANS flow about a RAE2822 airfoil in transonic, and detached subsonic conditions are presented for the drag coefficient estimation. The asset of the proposed method is patent. The obtained 2D anisotropic mono-block mesh well captures flow features as well as global aerodynamic functionals. Interestingly, the constraints imposed by structured grids may be relaxed by the use of non-matching multi-block approach that limits the outward propagation of local mesh refinement through all of the computational domain. The proposed method also leads to accurate results for these multi-block meshes but at a fraction of the cost. Finally, the method is also successfully applied to a more complex geometry, namely, a mono-block mesh in a 3D RANS transonic flow about an M6 wing. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Serge Prudhomme,et al.  On goal-oriented error estimation for elliptic problems: application to the control of pointwise errors , 1999 .

[2]  Ralf Hartmann,et al.  Adjoint-based error estimation and adaptive mesh refinement for the RANS and k-ω turbulence model equations , 2011, J. Comput. Phys..

[3]  Eusebio Valero,et al.  Comparison of Mesh Adaptation Using the Adjoint Methodology and Truncation Error Estimates , 2012 .

[4]  Jean-Antoine Désidéri,et al.  Finite-volume goal-oriented mesh adaptation for aerodynamics using functional derivative with respect to nodal coordinates , 2016, J. Comput. Phys..

[5]  D. Venditti,et al.  Anisotropic grid adaptation for functional outputs: application to two-dimensional viscous flows , 2003 .

[6]  D. Venditti,et al.  Adjoint error estimation and grid adaptation for functional outputs: application to quasi-one-dimensional flow , 2000 .

[7]  E. Nielsen,et al.  Using an Adjoint Approach to Eliminate Mesh Sensitivities in Computational Design , 2005 .

[8]  R. Dwight.  Goal‐oriented mesh adaptation for finite volume methods using a dissipation‐based error indicator , 2007 .

[9]  William L. Oberkampf,et al.  Issues in Computational Fluid Dynamics Code Verification and Validation , 1997 .

[10]  Richard P. Dwight,et al.  Heuristic a posteriori estimation of error due to dissipation in finite volume schemes and application to mesh adaptation , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..

[11]  Anthony T. Patera,et al.  A posteriori finite-element output bounds for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations: application to a natural convection problem , 2001 .

[12]  R. Hartmann,et al.  Adaptive discontinuous Galerkin finite element methods for the compressible Euler equations , 2002 .

[13]  Rolf Rannacher,et al.  An optimal control approach to a posteriori error estimation in finite element methods , 2001, Acta Numerica.

[14]  Ralf Hartmann,et al.  Error estimation and anisotropic mesh refinement for 3d laminar aerodynamic flow simulations , 2010, J. Comput. Phys..

[15]  A. Resmini,et al.  Sparse grids‐based stochastic approximations with applications to aerodynamics sensitivity analysis , 2016 .

[16]  Laurent Cambier,et al.  The Onera elsA CFD software: input from research and feedback from industry , 2013 .

[17]  P. Roache.  QUANTIFICATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS , 1997 .

[18]  Ralf Hartmann,et al.  Adjoint‐based airfoil optimization with discretization error control , 2015 .

[19]  Claes Johnson,et al.  Numerics and hydrodynamic stability: toward error control in computational fluid dynamics , 1995 .

[20]  Jacques Peter,et al.  Goal oriented mesh adaptation using total derivative of aerodynamic functions with respect to mesh coordinates – With applications to Euler flows , 2012 .

[21]  Timothy J. Barth,et al.  A Posteriori Error Estimation for Discontinuous Galerkin Approximations of Hyperbolic Systems , 2000 .

[22]  Antoine Dumont,et al.  Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes Simulations on NACA0012 and ONERA-M6 Wing with the ONERA elsA Solver , 2016 .

[23]  Jean-Antoine Désidéri,et al.  Mesh quality assessment based on aerodynamic functional output total derivatives , 2014 .

[24]  D. Venditti,et al.  Grid adaptation for functional outputs: application to two-dimensional inviscid flows , 2002 .