Computer support for knowledge construction in collaborative learning environments

Organisations increasingly use multidisciplinary teams to construct solutions for complex problems. Research has shown that multidisciplinary teams do not guarantee good problem solutions. Common ground is seen as vital to team performance. In this paper an ICT-tool to support complex problem solving is studied. A framework for knowledge construction inspired the design of computer support for knowledge construction. The basic support principle consisted of making individual perspectives explicit, which serves as a basis for negotiating common ground. This principle was embedded in a collaborative learning environment in three ways, which differed from each other in the extent to which users were coerced to adhere to the embedded support principles. Coercion, as expected, was correlated with negotiation of common ground; the more coercion, the more participants would negotiate the meaning of contributions to the ICT-tool, and the more common ground they would have. Self-report data suggested that Intermediate coercion resulted in the least common ground. This may have been caused by some disruption of group processes.

[1]  Nick Hammond,et al.  Graphical Argumentation and Design Cognition , 1997, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[2]  D. Roger,et al.  Conversational Exchange Analysis , 1982 .

[3]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  Book review : Group model building : facilitating team learning using system dynamics , 1998 .

[4]  James F. Courtney,et al.  Decision making and knowledge management in inquiring organizations: toward a new decision-making paradigm for DSS , 2001, Decis. Support Syst..

[5]  Simon Peck,et al.  Group Model Building: Facilitating Team Learning Using System Dynamics , 1996, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[6]  L P Noldus,et al.  The Observer Video-Pro: New software for the collection, management, and presentation of time-structured data from videotapes and digital media files , 2000, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[7]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[8]  Jan van der Meij,et al.  Learning with Multiple Representations , 1998 .

[9]  A. N. Leont’ev.  The Problem of Activity in Psychology , 1974 .

[10]  M. V. Asselt,et al.  More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy , 2001 .

[11]  Ingrid Mulder,et al.  Assessing group learning and shared understanding in technology-mediated interaction , 2002, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[12]  P. Dillenbourg,et al.  The evolution of research on collaborative learning , 1996 .

[13]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  Promoting reflective interactions in a CSCL environment , 1997, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[14]  F. Fischer,et al.  Fostering collaborative knowledge construction with visualization tools , 2002 .

[15]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Grounding in communication , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[16]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. , 1998, Annual review of psychology.

[17]  B. Lomov.  The Problem of Activity in Psychology , 1982 .

[18]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design , 2002 .

[19]  D. Perkins,et al.  Individual and Social Aspects of Learning , 1998 .

[20]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  Promoting reflective interactions in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment , 1997 .

[21]  R. Tamblyn,et al.  Problem-based learning : an approach to medical education , 1980 .

[22]  S. Sharan.  Handbook of Cooperative Learning Methods , 1994 .

[23]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches , 1999 .

[24]  J. Wertsch.  The Concept of Activity in Soviet Psychology , 1981 .

[25]  J. Walsh.  Managerial and Organizational Cognition: Notes from a Trip Down Memory Lane , 1995 .

[26]  Jan Van Bruggen.  Explorations in graphical argumentation The use of external representations of argumentation in collaborative problem solving. , 2003 .

[27]  Ramkrishnan V. Tenkasi,et al.  P ERSPECTIVE M AKING AND P ERSPECTIVE T AKING IN C OMMUNITIES OF K NOWING , 2000 .

[28]  Nils Jensen,et al.  Covase: Collaborative Visualization for Constructivist Learning , 2003, CSCL.

[29]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  Representational Guidance for Collaborative Learning. , 2003 .

[30]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  The social affordances of computer-supported collaborative learning environments , 2001, 31st Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Impact on Engineering and Science Education. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37193).

[31]  Helen Hasan,et al.  Support for the sense-making activity of managers , 2001, Decis. Support Syst..

[32]  Rachel Hertz-Lazarovits,et al.  Interaction in cooperative groups : the theoretical anatomy of group learning , 1992 .

[33]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Contributing to Discourse , 1989, Cogn. Sci..

[34]  Michael J. Baker,et al.  The role of grounding in collaborative learning tasks , 1999 .

[35]  Sharon J. Derry,et al.  Individual and Distributed Cognitions in Interdisciplinary Teamwork: A Developing Case Study and Emerging Theory , 1997 .

[36]  R. Bromme.  6. Beyond One's Own Perspective: The Psychology of Cognitive Interdisciplinarity , 2000 .

[37]  Brigid Barron.  When Smart Groups Fail , 2003 .

[38]  Amy Soller,et al.  Computational Modeling and Analysis of Knowledge Sharing in Collaborative Distance Learning , 2004, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[39]  L. Lipponen,et al.  Patterns of participation and discourse in elementary students’ computer-supported collaborative learning , 2003 .

[40]  P. Dillenbourg,et al.  Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL? , 2002 .

[41]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  Perspectives on socially shared cognition , 1991 .

[42]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Supporting the evolution of design artifacts with representations of context and intent , 1995, Symposium on Designing Interactive Systems.

[43]  Marjolein B.A. van Asselt,et al.  Perspectives on uncertainty and risk , 2000 .

[44]  D. Perkins,et al.  Chapter 1: Individual and Social Aspects of Learning , 1998 .

[45]  Beatriz Barros,et al.  An Approach to Analyse Collaboration When Shared Structured Workspaces Are Used for Carrying out Group Learning Processes , 1999 .

[46]  Nikolaos M. Avouris,et al.  On analysis of collaborative problem solving: an object-oriented approach , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[47]  Erik R. Larsen,et al.  Adaptive Learning in Organizations: A System Dynamics-Based Exploration , 1997 .