Three Virtues of Similarity-based Multivariate Pattern Analysis : An example from the human object vision pathway

We present an fMRI investigation of object representation in the human ventral vision pathway highlighting three aspects of similarity analysis that make it especially useful for illuminating the representational content underlying neural activation patterns. First, similarity structures allow for an abstract depiction of representational content in a given brain region. This is demonstrated using hierarchical clustering and multidimensional scaling (MDS) of the dissimilarity matrices defined by our stimulus categories—female and male human faces, dog faces, monkey faces, chairs, shoes, and houses. For example, in ventral temporal (VT) cortex the similarity space was neatly divided into face and non-face regions. Within the face region of the MDS space, male and female human faces were closest to each other, and dog faces were closer to human faces than monkey faces. Within the non-face region of the abstract space, the smaller objects—shoes and chairs—were closer to each other than they were to houses. Second, similarity structures are independent of the data source. Dissimilarities among stimulus categories can be derived from behavioral measures, from stimulus models, or from neural activity patterns in different brain regions and different subjects. The similarity structures from these diverse sources all have the same dimensionality. This source independence allowed for the direct comparison of similarity structures across subjects (N = 16) and across three brain regions representing early–, mid–, and late–stages of the object vision pathway. Finally, similarity structures can change shape in well-ordered ways as the source of the dissimilarities changes—helping to illuminate how representational content is transformed along a neural pathway. By comparing similarity spaces from three regions along the ventral visual pathway, we demonstrate how the similarity structure transforms from an organization based on lowlevel visual features—as reflected by patterns in early visual cortex—to a more categorical representation in late object vision cortex with intermediate organization at the middle stage.

[1]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  F. Tong,et al.  Decoding the visual and subjective contents of the human brain , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Matching Categorical Object Representations in Inferior Temporal Cortex of Man and Monkey , 2008, Neuron.

[4]  D. Botstein,et al.  Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  J. Gallant,et al.  Identifying natural images from human brain activity , 2008, Nature.

[6]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  A cortical representation of the local visual environment , 1998, Nature.

[7]  Sean M. Polyn,et al.  Beyond mind-reading: multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  J. Sergent,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing. A positron emission tomography study. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[9]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  Theoretical, Statistical, and Practical Perspectives on Pattern-based Classification Approaches to the Analysis of Functional Neuroimaging Data , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Human Body , 2001 .

[11]  A. P. Georgopoulos,et al.  Neuronal population coding of movement direction. , 1986, Science.

[12]  G. Rees,et al.  Predicting the orientation of invisible stimuli from activity in human primary visual cortex , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Category-Specific Organization in the Human Brain Does Not Require Visual Experience , 2009, Neuron.

[14]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al.  Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience Systems Neuroscience , 2022 .

[16]  Stefan Pollmann,et al.  PyMVPA: a Python Toolbox for Multivariate Pattern Analysis of fMRI Data , 2009, Neuroinformatics.

[17]  N. Kriegeskorte,et al.  Revealing representational content with pattern-information fMRI--an introductory guide. , 2009, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[18]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  On Spectral Clustering: Analysis and an algorithm , 2001, NIPS.

[19]  P. Arabie,et al.  Auditory versus phonetic accounts of observed confusions between consonant phonemes. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  P. Arabie,et al.  Indclus: An individual differences generalization of the adclus model and the mapclus algorithm , 1983 .

[21]  S. Edelman,et al.  Toward direct visualization of the internal shape representation space by fMRI , 1998, Psychobiology.

[22]  Hervé Abdi,et al.  How to compute reliability estimates and display confidence and tolerance intervals for pattern classifiers using the Bootstrap and 3-way multidimensional scaling (DISTATIS) , 2009, NeuroImage.

[23]  G. Rees,et al.  Neuroimaging: Decoding mental states from brain activity in humans , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[24]  J. Fodor The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[25]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL , 2004, NeuroImage.

[27]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of functional MRI time‐series , 1994, Human Brain Mapping.

[28]  T. Landauer,et al.  A Solution to Plato's Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. , 1997 .

[29]  A. Ishai,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Representations of Faces and Objects in Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2001, Science.

[30]  Lance J. Rips,et al.  Semantic distance and the verification of semantic relations , 1973 .

[31]  Tom Michael Mitchell,et al.  Predicting Human Brain Activity Associated with the Meanings of Nouns , 2008, Science.

[32]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  Partially Distributed Representations of Objects and Faces in Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  Andrew C. Connolly,et al.  Effect of congenital blindness on the semantic representation of some everyday concepts , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Domain-Specific Knowledge Systems in the Brain: The Animate-Inanimate Distinction , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[35]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[36]  Stephen José Hanson,et al.  Combinatorial codes in ventral temporal lobe for object recognition: Haxby (2001) revisited: is there a “face” area? , 2004, NeuroImage.

[37]  K. R. Clarke,et al.  Non‐parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure , 1993 .

[38]  Aleks Jakulin,et al.  Analyzing the U.S. Senate in 2003: Similarities, Clusters, and Blocs , 2009, Political Analysis.

[39]  Forrest W. Young,et al.  Nonmetric individual differences multidimensional scaling: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling features , 1977 .

[40]  Joseph L. Zinnes,et al.  Theory and Methods of Scaling. , 1958 .