Motion Planning Analysis According to ISO/TS 15066 in Human–Robot Collaboration Environment

An important task in the collaborative human–robot work-space development is ensuring operator safety. Setting up global restriction for the overall robot movement based on worst-case scenario leads to a decrease in efficiency and increase of working time. Considering safety precautions in the motion planning phase may help to satisfy the safety of the operator while keeping the production time effective. In this study, several methods of including safety into motion planning are proposed and evaluated. Safety of the operator is defined based on technical specification ISO/TS 15066 [1] and the principle of energy absorption by the operator body. Simulations of regulated robot movement are based on model scenario captured in an experimental workplace with assistant co-working manipulator PaDY. Velocity limits for the robot are drafted according to predicted operator trajectory. By using the proposed method, we have been able to reduce the relative velocity during operation of the robot and reduce the risk of harming workers. We propose a method of relative velocity measurement and limiting. Finally, we compare the benefits and robustness of different methods.

[1]  K. Kosuge,et al.  Motion planning with worker's trajectory prediction for assembly task partner robot , 2012, 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[2]  Dmitry Berenson,et al.  Human-robot collaborative manipulation planning using early prediction of human motion , 2013, 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[3]  Henrik Gordon Petersen,et al.  Computation of Safe Path Velocity for Collaborative Robots , 2018, 2018 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[4]  Jun Kinugawa,et al.  Dynamic collision avoidance method for co-worker robot using time augmented configuration-space , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation.

[5]  R. Contini Body segment parameters. II. , 1972, Artificial limbs.

[6]  Alessandro Marino,et al.  Safety in human-multi robot collaborative scenarios: a trajectory scaling approach , 2018 .

[7]  Stefano Stramigioli,et al.  Development of a Safety- and Energy-Aware Impedance Controller for Collaborative Robots , 2018, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[8]  Jeremy A Marvel,et al.  Implementing Speed and Separation Monitoring in Collaborative Robot Workcells. , 2017, Robotics and computer-integrated manufacturing.

[9]  Jeremy A. Marvel,et al.  Characterizing Task-Based Human–Robot Collaboration Safety in Manufacturing , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems.

[10]  Sungsoo Rhim,et al.  Allowable Maximum Safe Velocity Control based on Human-Robot Distance for Collaborative Robot , 2018, 2018 15th International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots (UR).

[11]  Andrea Maria Zanchettin,et al.  Safety in human-robot collaborative manufacturing environments: Metrics and control , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[12]  Andrea Maria Zanchettin,et al.  Trajectory generation algorithm for safe human-robot collaboration based on multiple depth sensor measurements , 2018, Mechatronics.

[13]  Jun Kinugawa,et al.  PaDY: Human-friendly/cooperative working support robot for production site , 2010, 2010 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.