American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Screening with MRI as an Adjunct to Mammography

New evidence on breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) screening has become available since the American Cancer Society (ACS) last issued guidelines for the early detection of breast cancer in 2003. A guideline panel has reviewed this evidence and developed new recommendations for women at different defined levels of risk. Screening MRI is recommended for women with an approximately 20–25% or greater lifetime risk of breast cancer, including women with a strong family history of breast or ovarian cancer and women who were treated for Hodgkin disease. There are several risk subgroups for which the available data are insufficient to recommend for or against screening, including women with a personal history of breast cancer, carcinoma in situ, atypical hyperplasia, and extremely dense breasts on mammography. Diagnostic uses of MRI were not considered to be within the scope of this review.

[1]  J. Folkman Tumor angiogenesis: therapeutic implications. , 1971, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  F Merletti,et al.  Mammographic features of the breast and breast cancer risk. , 1982, American journal of epidemiology.

[3]  D. Stablein,et al.  Survival after postoperative combination treatment of rectal cancer. , 1986, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  M. Szklo,et al.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns and breast cancer risk. , 1987, Epidemiologic reviews.

[5]  M. Buyse,et al.  Preoperative Radiotherapy as Adjuvant Treatment in Rectal Cancer: Final Results of a Randomized Study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) , 1988, Annals of surgery.

[6]  M. Gail,et al.  Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. , 1989, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[7]  W. Meyers,et al.  Effective surgical adjuvant therapy for high-risk rectal carcinoma. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  N. Boyd,et al.  The risk of breast cancer associated with mammographic parenchymal patterns: a meta-analysis of the published literature to examine the effect of method of classification. , 1992, Cancer detection and prevention.

[9]  S E Harms,et al.  MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. , 1993, Radiology.

[10]  S. Hancock,et al.  Breast Cancer After Treatment of Hodgkin's Disease , 1993 .

[11]  A. Oza,et al.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns: a marker of breast cancer risk. , 1993, Epidemiologic reviews.

[12]  Rolf Vosshenrich,et al.  Signalverhalten maligner und benigner Läsionen in der dynamischen 2D-MRT der Mamma , 1993 .

[13]  L J van Erning,et al.  MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadolinium-enhanced TurboFLASH subtraction technique. , 1994, Radiology.

[14]  N. Risch,et al.  Autosomal dominant inheritance of early‐onset breast cancer. Implications for risk prediction , 1994 .

[15]  R. Gilles,et al.  Locally advanced breast cancer: contrast-enhanced subtraction MR imaging of response to preoperative chemotherapy. , 1994, Radiology.

[16]  H. Wieand,et al.  Improving adjuvant therapy for rectal cancer by combining protracted-infusion fluorouracil with radiation therapy after curative surgery. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  Steven E. Bayer,et al.  A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1. , 1994, Science.

[18]  S. Seal,et al.  Localization of a breast cancer susceptibility gene, BRCA2, to chromosome 13q12-13. , 1994, Science.

[19]  A. Miller,et al.  Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[20]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status. , 1995, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[21]  D. Easton,et al.  Breast and ovarian cancer incidence in BRCA1-mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. , 1995, American journal of human genetics.

[22]  L. Robison,et al.  Breast cancer and other second neoplasms after childhood Hodgkin's disease. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  Alfred A. Boyd,et al.  Ashkenazi Jewish population frequencies for common mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 , 1996, Nature Genetics.

[24]  E. Thomson,et al.  Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to Cancer. II. BRCA1 and BRCA2 , 1997 .

[25]  E. Klein,et al.  The incidence of breast cancer following mantle field radiation therapy as a function of dose and technique. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[26]  D. Berry,et al.  Probability of carrying a mutation of breast-ovarian cancer gene BRCA1 based on family history. , 1997, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[27]  K Offit,et al.  Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer. II. BRCA1 and BRCA2. Cancer Genetics Studies Consortium. , 1997, JAMA.

[28]  P. Hartge,et al.  The risk of cancer associated with specific mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 among Ashkenazi Jews. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  C. Willett,et al.  High risk of breast carcinoma after irradiation of young women with Hodgkin's disease , 1997, Cancer.

[30]  N. Boyd,et al.  Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. , 1998, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[31]  J F Debatin,et al.  Improved diagnostic accuracy in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the breast by combined quantitative and qualitative analysis. , 1998, The British journal of radiology.

[32]  D. Berry,et al.  Determining carrier probabilities for breast cancer-susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[33]  D Krebs,et al.  Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: preliminary results. , 2000, Radiology.

[34]  T. Lister,et al.  Risk of second malignancy after Hodgkin's disease in a collaborative British cohort: the relation to age at treatment. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[35]  M D Schnall,et al.  MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. , 2001, Radiology.

[36]  D. Bowen,et al.  Comparisons of two breast cancer risk estimates in women with a family history of breast cancer. , 2001, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[37]  A. Hanlon,et al.  Second cancers after conservative surgery and radiation for stages I-II breast cancer: identifying a subset of women at increased risk. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[38]  U. Fischer,et al.  International investigation of breast MRI: results of a multicentre study (11 sites) concerning diagnostic parameters for contrast-enhanced MRI based on 519 histopathologically correlated lesions , 2001, European Radiology.

[39]  B. Weber,et al.  Application of breast cancer risk prediction models in clinical practice. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[40]  A. Broeks,et al.  Roles of radiation dose, chemotherapy, and hormonal factors in breast cancer following Hodgkin's disease. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[41]  A Howell,et al.  Evaluation of breast cancer risk assessment packages in the family history evaluation and screening programme , 2003, Journal of medical genetics.

[42]  Elizabeth A Morris,et al.  MRI of occult breast carcinoma in a high-risk population. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[43]  Adopted on March American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[44]  D. Nelson,et al.  Risk of breast cancer and breast cancer characteristics in women treated with supradiaphragmatic radiation for Hodgkin lymphoma: Mayo Clinic experience. , 2003, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[45]  J. Hopper,et al.  Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case Series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. , 2003, American journal of human genetics.

[46]  W. P. Evans,et al.  American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Cancer Screening: Update 2003 , 2003, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[47]  L. Robison,et al.  High risk of subsequent neoplasms continues with extended follow-up of childhood Hodgkin's disease: report from the Late Effects Study Group. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[48]  Malcolm C Pike,et al.  Mammographic density and breast cancer in three ethnic groups. , 2003, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[49]  Ellen Warner,et al.  Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination , 2004, JAMA.

[50]  E. Warner,et al.  Intensive radiologic surveillance: a focus on the psychological issues. , 2004, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[51]  Massimo Bazzocchi,et al.  Sensitivity of MRI versus mammography for detecting foci of multifocal, multicentric breast cancer in Fatty and dense breasts using the whole-breast pathologic examination as a gold standard. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[52]  J. Berlin,et al.  Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[53]  D. Easton,et al.  The BOADICEA model of genetic susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[54]  Rebecca S Lewis,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. , 2004, Radiology.

[55]  B. Geller,et al.  A prospective study of breast cancer risk using routine mammographic breast density measurements. , 2004, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[56]  N. Hylton,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy. , 2004, JAMA.

[57]  Jeffrey W. Clark,et al.  Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital. Weekly clinicopathological exercises. Case 18-2004. A 61-year-old man with rectal bleeding and a 2-cm mass in the rectum. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[58]  Norman Wolmark,et al.  Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project , 2004, Cancer.

[59]  Neil Klar,et al.  Accuracy of cancer family histories: comparison of two breast cancer syndromes. , 2004, Genetic testing.

[60]  Stephen W Duffy,et al.  A breast cancer prediction model incorporating familial and personal risk factors , 2004, Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice.

[61]  H. D. de Koning,et al.  Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[62]  Ellen Warner,et al.  MRI surveillance for hereditary breast-cancer risk , 2005, The Lancet.

[63]  Constantine Gatsonis,et al.  Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imaging , 2005, Cancer.

[64]  M. Gail,et al.  Cumulative absolute breast cancer risk for young women treated for Hodgkin lymphoma. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[65]  M. Pike,et al.  Greatly increased occurrence of breast cancers in areas of mammographically dense tissue , 2005, Breast Cancer Research.

[66]  A R Padhani,et al.  Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS) , 2005, The Lancet.

[67]  U. P. S. T. Force Genetic Risk Assessment and BRCA Mutation Testing for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility: Recommendation Statement , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[68]  K. Offit,et al.  Hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[69]  Fiona J Gilbert,et al.  Reading protocol for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast: sensitivity and specificity analysis. , 2005, Radiology.

[70]  H. D. de Koning,et al.  Exploring the course of psychological distress around two successive control visits in women at hereditary risk of breast cancer. , 2005, European journal of cancer.

[71]  R. Fimmers,et al.  Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[72]  H. D. de Koning,et al.  Hereditary breast cancer growth rates and its impact on screening policy. , 2005, European journal of cancer.

[73]  R. Elledge,et al.  Premalignant and In Situ Breast Disease: Biology and Clinical Implications , 2005, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[74]  J. Hecht,et al.  Addition of bevacizumab to bolus fluorouracil and leucovorin in first-line metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a randomized phase II trial. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[75]  E. Morris,et al.  Results of MRI Screening for Breast Cancer in High-Risk Patients with LCIS and Atypical Hyperplasia , 2007, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[76]  Karla Kerlikowske,et al.  Prospective breast cancer risk prediction model for women undergoing screening mammography. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[77]  A R Padhani,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of screening with contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging vs X-ray mammography of women at a high familial risk of breast cancer , 2006, British Journal of Cancer.

[78]  Bruce L Daniel,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging. , 2006, JAMA.

[79]  K. Malone,et al.  Risk of invasive breast carcinoma among women diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ and lobular carcinoma in situ, 1988‐2001 , 2006, Cancer.

[80]  J. Haddow,et al.  Screen-positive rates and agreement among six family history screening protocols for breast/ovarian cancer in a population-based cohort of 21- to 55-year-old women , 2006, Genetics in Medicine.

[81]  I. Imaz,et al.  Overall Breast Density in MR Mammography: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Implications in Breast Cancer , 2006, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[82]  P. Dennis,et al.  PTEN hamartoma tumor syndromes , 2008, European Journal of Human Genetics.