Extraction of regulatory gene/protein networks from Medline

MOTIVATION We have previously developed a rule-based approach for extracting information on the regulation of gene expression in yeast. The biomedical literature, however, contains information on several other equally important regulatory mechanisms, in particular phosphorylation, which we now expanded for our rule-based system also to extract. RESULTS This paper presents new results for extraction of relational information from biomedical text. We have improved our system, STRING-IE, to capture both new types of linguistic constructs as well as new types of biological information [i.e. (de-)phosphorylation]. The precision remains stable with a slight increase in recall. From almost one million PubMed abstracts related to four model organisms, we manage to extract regulatory networks and binary phosphorylations comprising 3,319 relation chunks. The accuracy is 83-90% and 86-95% for gene expression and (de-)phosphorylation relations, respectively. To achieve this, we made use of an organism-specific resource of gene/protein names considerably larger than those used in most other biology related information extraction approaches. These names were included in the lexicon when retraining the part-of-speech (POS) tagger on the GENIA corpus. For the domain in question, an accuracy of 96.4% was attained on POS tags. It should be noted that the rules were developed for yeast and successfully applied to both abstracts and full-text articles related to other organisms with comparable accuracy. AVAILABILITY The revised GENIA corpus, the POS tagger, the extraction rules and the full sets of extracted relations are available from http://www.bork.embl.de/Docu/STRING-IE

[1]  Jerry R. Hobbs Information extraction from biomedical text , 2002, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[2]  Miguel A. Andrade-Navarro,et al.  Information extraction from full text scientific articles: Where are the keywords? , 2003, BMC Bioinformatics.

[3]  Michael Krauthammer,et al.  GENIES: a natural-language processing system for the extraction of molecular pathways from journal articles , 2001, ISMB.

[4]  C. Ouzounis,et al.  Automatic extraction of protein interactions from scientific abstracts. , 1999, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.

[5]  James Pustejovsky,et al.  Robust Relational Parsing Over Biomedical Literature: Extracting Inhibit Relations , 2001, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.

[6]  Ioannis Xenarios,et al.  Mining literature for protein-protein interactions , 2001, Bioinform..

[7]  Kara Dolinski,et al.  Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD) provides secondary gene annotation using the Gene Ontology (GO) , 2002, Nucleic Acids Res..

[8]  Peer Bork,et al.  Extracting Regulatory Gene Expression Networks From Pubmed , 2004, ACL.

[9]  Maria Jesus Martin,et al.  The SWISS-PROT protein knowledgebase and its supplement TrEMBL in 2003 , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[10]  Steven P. Abney Partial parsing via finite-state cascades , 1996, Natural Language Engineering.

[11]  Christian von Mering,et al.  STRING: known and predicted protein–protein associations, integrated and transferred across organisms , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[12]  Peer Bork,et al.  The way we write , 2003, EMBO Reports.

[13]  Miguel A. Andrade-Navarro,et al.  Automatic Extraction of Biological Information from Scientific Text: Protein-Protein Interactions , 1999, ISMB.

[14]  Udo Hahn,et al.  Tagging Medical Documents with High Accuracy , 2004, PRICAI.