Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges

There is emerging agreement that sustainability challenges require new ways of knowledge production and decision-making. One key aspect of sustainability science, therefore, is the involvement of actors from outside academia into the research process in order to integrate the best available knowledge, reconcile values and preferences, as well as create ownership for problems and solution options. Transdisciplinary, community-based, interactive, or participatory research approaches are often suggested as appropriate means to meet both the requirements posed by real-world problems as well as the goals of sustainability science as a transformational scientific field. Dispersed literature on these approaches and a variety of empirical projects applying them make it difficult for interested researchers and practitioners to review and become familiar with key components and design principles of how to do transdisciplinary sustainability research. Starting from a conceptual model of an ideal–typical transdisciplinary research process, this article synthesizes and structures such a set of principles from various strands of the literature and empirical experiences. We then elaborate on them, looking at challenges and some coping strategies as experienced in transdisciplinary sustainability projects in Europe, North America, South America, Africa, and Asia. The article concludes with future research needed in order to further enhance the practice of transdisciplinary sustainability research.

[1]  Barbara J. Regeer,et al.  Six Guiding Principles for Evaluating Mode-2 Strategies for Sustainable Development , 2009 .

[2]  Roland W. Scholz,et al.  Analytic and Dynamic Approach to Collaboration: A Transdisciplinary Case Study on Sustainable Landscape Development in a Swiss Prealpine Region , 2008 .

[3]  Sybille van den Hove,et al.  Between consensus and compromise: acknowledging the negotiation dimension in participatory approaches , 2006 .

[4]  Thomas Jahn,et al.  CITY: mobil : A Model for Integration in Sustainability Research , 2008 .

[5]  J. Spangenberg Sustainability science: a review, an analysis and some empirical lessons , 2011, Environmental Conservation.

[6]  C. Pohl,et al.  Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainability research , 2006 .

[7]  Roland W. Scholz,et al.  Energiestrategien kleiner Gemeinden und kleiner und mittlerer Unternehmen. Der Fall Urnäsch im Kanton Appenzell Ausserrhoden , 2010 .

[8]  Kristian Skagen Ekeli The principle of liberty and legal representation of posterity , 2007 .

[9]  W. Clark,et al.  Boundary work for sustainable development: Natural resource management at the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Measuring societal effects of transdisciplinary research projects: design and application of an evaluation method. , 2007, Evaluation and program planning.

[11]  Pim Martens,et al.  Integrated Monitoring of Sustainable Development , 2011 .

[12]  K. Takeuchi,et al.  Sustainability science: building a new discipline , 2006 .

[13]  E. Ostrom,et al.  Earth System Science for Global Sustainability: Grand Challenges , 2010, Science.

[14]  Carl Mitcham,et al.  The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity , 2012 .

[15]  Eva Heiskanen,et al.  Modulating societal acceptance in new energy projects: Towards a toolkit methodology for project managers , 2009 .

[16]  William C. Clark,et al.  Public Participation in Sustainability Science: Frontmatter , 2003 .

[17]  John Robinson Future subjunctive: backcasting as social learning , 2003 .

[18]  Jan Rotmans,et al.  Integrated assessment: A growing child on its way to maturity , 1996 .

[19]  C. Pohl,et al.  Principles for designing transdisciplinary research : proposed by the Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences , 2007 .

[20]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[21]  Mark W. Fraser,et al.  Intervention Research: Developing Social Programs , 2009 .

[22]  A. Weale Embedded Case Study Methods: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Knowledge , 2003 .

[23]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  From complex systems analysis to transformational change: a comparative appraisal of sustainability science projects , 2012, Sustainability Science.

[24]  James Tansey,et al.  Co-production, emergent properties and strong interactive social research: the Georgia Basin Futures Project , 2006 .

[25]  Roland W. Scholz,et al.  Functional‐dynamic public participation in technological decision‐making: site selection processes of nuclear waste repositories , 2010 .

[26]  Anna L. Carew,et al.  The TD Wheel: A heuristic to shape, support and evaluate transdisciplinary research , 2010 .

[27]  Michael Stauffacher,et al.  Beyond Neocorporatism? Transdisciplinary Case Studies as a Means for Collaborative Learning in Sustainable Development , 2010 .

[28]  T. Oki,et al.  Visioneering: an essential framework in sustainability science , 2011 .

[29]  F. Chapin,et al.  A safe operating space for humanity , 2009, Nature.

[30]  E. Becker PROBLEM TRANSFORMATIONS IN TRANSDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH , 2011 .

[31]  J. Klein Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research: a literature review. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.

[32]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Educating Students in Real-world Sustainability Research: Vision and Implementation , 2011 .

[33]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Challenges of transdisciplinary research as interactive knowledge generation experiences from transdisciplinary case study research , 2007 .

[34]  A. Elzinga The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1997 .

[35]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Science for the PostNormal Age , 2001 .

[36]  Louis Lebel,et al.  Linking Knowledge and Action for Sustainable Development , 2006 .

[37]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Functions of scenarios in transition processes , 2006 .

[38]  R. J. Swarta,et al.  The problem of the future : sustainability science and scenario analysis , 2004 .

[39]  C. Dunn,et al.  Malaria risk behaviours, socio-cultural practices and rural livelihoods in southern Tanzania: implications for bednet usage. , 2011, Social science & medicine.

[40]  Anne Jerneck,et al.  Structuring sustainability science , 2011 .

[41]  C. Pohl,et al.  Handbook of transdisciplinary research , 2008 .

[42]  Roland W. Scholz,et al.  How can transdisciplinary research contribute to knowledge democracy , 2010 .

[43]  Roland W. Scholz,et al.  Embedded Case Study Methods , 2002 .

[44]  Gertrude Hirsch Hadorn,et al.  Unity of knowledge (in transdisciplinary research for sustainability) , 2009 .

[45]  Manfred Denich,et al.  Wild coffee management and plant diversity in the montane rainforest of southwestern Ethiopia. , 2010 .

[46]  C. Pohl What is progress in transdisciplinary research , 2011 .

[47]  A. S. uiterkamp Environmental Literacy in Science and Society , 2013 .

[48]  Michael Gibbons,et al.  Science's new social contract with society , 1999, Nature.

[49]  P. Burger Embedded Case Study Methods: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Knowledge , 2001 .

[50]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Science for the Post-Normal Age , 1993, Commonplace.

[51]  Pim Martens,et al.  Community Essay: Sustainability: Science or Fiction? , 2006 .

[52]  Roland W. Scholz,et al.  Expert-based scenarios for strategic waste and resource management planning—C&D waste recycling in the Canton of Zurich, Switzerland , 2009 .

[53]  Thomas Jahn,et al.  Transdisciplinarity in the Practice of Research , 2008 .

[54]  Roland W. Scholz,et al.  Supporting energy initiatives in small communities by linking visions with energy scenarios and multi-criteria assessment , 2011 .

[55]  Jan Rotmans,et al.  Integrated sustainability assessment: what is it, why do it and how? , 2006 .

[56]  Daniel J. Lang,et al.  Problem structuring for transitions: The case of Swiss waste management , 2009 .

[57]  Robert Ries,et al.  Challenges of sustainable recovery processes in tsunami affected communities , 2010 .

[58]  Franz W. Gatzweiler,et al.  Institutionalising Biodiversity Conservation - The Case of Ethiopian Coffee Forests , 2005 .

[59]  R. Scholz Environmental Literacy in Science and Society: From Knowledge to Decisions , 2011 .

[60]  M. Shaha,et al.  Transdisziplinäre Forschung. Integrative Forschungsprozesse verstehen und bewerten , 2010 .

[61]  R. Kasperson,et al.  Sustainability Science , 2019, Critical Skills for Environmental Professionals.

[62]  R. Kates,et al.  Long-term trends and a sustainability transition , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[63]  Michael Scheuermann,et al.  Forschungsverbundmanagement. Handbuch zur Gestaltung inter- und transdisziplinärer Projekte , 2006 .

[64]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Saguf: Joint Problem Identification and Structuring in Environmental Research , 2007 .

[65]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  User engagement in sustainability research , 2011 .

[66]  Pim Martens,et al.  A participatory approach in regional sustainable development of the Slovak Republic: a case study of the Spis region , 2007 .

[67]  Roland W. Scholz,et al.  Managing Transition in Clusters: Area Development Negotiations as a Tool for Sustaining Traditional Industries in a Swiss Prealpine Region , 2007 .

[68]  Roland W. Scholz,et al.  Expert views on sustainability and technology implementation , 2004 .

[69]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Technical safety vs. public involvement? A case study on the unrealized project for the disposal of nuclear waste at Wellenberg (Switzerland) , 2010 .

[70]  B. Siebenhüner Social learning and sustainability science: which role can stakeholder participation play? , 2004 .

[71]  Stefan Baumgärtner,et al.  Relating the Philosophy and Practice of Ecological Economics: The Role of Concepts, Models, and Case Studies in Inter- and Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research , 2008 .

[72]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Key competencies in sustainability: a reference framework for academic program development , 2011 .

[73]  Beth Savan,et al.  Contrasting Approaches to Community-based Research and a Case Study of Community Sustainability in Toronto, Canada , 2003 .

[74]  Sabine Maasen,et al.  Transdisciplinarity: a new mode of governing science? , 2006 .

[75]  David W. Cash,et al.  Knowledge systems for sustainable development , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[76]  Bronwyn L Horsey,et al.  Developing and applying a framework to evaluate participatory research for sustainability , 2007 .

[77]  Michael Pregernig Impact Assessment of Transdisciplinary Research: In Need of a More Distanced View Wirkungsmessung transdisziplinärer Forschung: Es fehlt der Blick aus der Distanz , 2007 .

[78]  Uwe Schneidewind,et al.  Institutionen für eine transformative Forschung. Zur Gründung der NaWis-RundeInstitutions for Transformative Research. The Formation of the NaWis Alliance , 2011 .

[79]  Clifford Mutero,et al.  Bed net use and associated factors in a rice farming community in Central Kenya , 2009, Malaria Journal.

[80]  Fern Wickson,et al.  Transdisciplinarity: Context, contradictions and capacity , 2008 .

[81]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[82]  Dirk R. Schmatz,et al.  Experience from downscaling IPCC-SRES scenarios to specific national-level focus scenarios for ecosystem service management , 2014 .

[83]  Katherine Hyman,et al.  Economic development, decoupling and urban infrastructure : the role of innovation for an urban transition in Cape Town , 2011 .

[84]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Transdisciplinary case studies as a means of sustainability learning: Historical framework and theory , 2006 .

[85]  Barbara Gray,et al.  Enhancing transdisciplinary research through collaborative leadership. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.

[86]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  A transdisciplinary approach for formalized integrated planning and decision-making in complex systems , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[87]  Frans Berkhout,et al.  Normative expectations in systems innovation , 2006, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[88]  W. Clark,et al.  Sustainability science: The emerging research program , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[89]  Gwen Arnold,et al.  A Review of Design Principles for Community-based Natural Resource Management , 2010 .