A Family of Location Models for Multiple‐Type Discrete Dispersion

One of the defining objectives in location science is to maximize dispersion. Facilities can be dispersed for a wide variety of purposes, including attempts to optimize competitive market advantage, disperse negative impacts, and optimize security. With one exception, all of the extant dispersion models consider only one type of facility, and ignore problems where multiple types of facilities must be located. We provide examples where multiple-type dispersion is appropriate and based on this develop a general class of facility location problems that optimize multiple-type dispersion. This family of models expands on the previously formulated definitions of dispersion for single types of facilities, by allowing the interactions among different types of facilities to determine the extent to which they will be spatially dispersed. We provide a set of integer-linear programming formulations for the principal models of this class and suggest a methodology for intelligent constraint elimination. We also present results of solving a range of multiple-type dispersion problems optimally and demonstrate that only the smallest versions of such problems can be solved in a reasonable amount of computer time using general-purpose optimization software. We conclude that the family of multiple-type dispersion models provides a more comprehensive, flexible, and realistic framework for locating facilities where weighted distances should be maximized, when compared with the special case of locating only a single type of facility.

[1]  E. Erkut The discrete p-dispersion problem , 1990 .

[2]  Alan T. Murray,et al.  IMPACT MODELS FOR SITING UNDESIRABLE FACILITIES , 2005 .

[3]  Justo Puerto,et al.  A maxmin location problem with nonconvex feasible , 1997 .

[4]  G. O. Wesolowsky,et al.  OBNOXIOUS FACILITY LOCATION IN THE INTERIOR OF A PLANAR NETWORK , 1995 .

[5]  R. Chandrasekaran,et al.  Location on Tree Networks: P-Centre and n-Dispersion Problems , 1981, Math. Oper. Res..

[6]  Fred Glover,et al.  Tabu Search: A Tutorial , 1990 .

[7]  K. E. Rosing,et al.  The p-Median and its Linear Programming Relaxation: An Approach to Large Problems , 1979 .

[8]  C. Revelle,et al.  Integer-friendly formulations for the r-separation problem , 1996 .

[9]  D. Shier A Min-Max Theorem for p-Center Problems on a Tree , 1977 .

[10]  Samuel J. Ratick,et al.  A Risk-Sharing Model for Locating Noxious Facilities , 1988 .

[11]  Russell D. Meller,et al.  The facility layout problem: Recent and emerging trends and perspectives , 1996 .

[12]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[13]  Frederick S. Hillier,et al.  Introduction of Operations Research , 1967 .

[14]  J. Fellmann Human Geography: Landscapes of Human Activities , 1990 .

[15]  Erhan Erkut,et al.  A comparison of p-dispersion heuristics , 1994, Comput. Oper. Res..

[16]  Jon Soderstrom,et al.  Sweet for the sour: Incentives in environmental mediation , 1984 .

[17]  Erhan Erkut,et al.  The discrete p-Maxian location problem , 1990, Comput. Oper. Res..

[18]  R. L. Church,et al.  Multiobjective location analysis of regional energy facility siting problems , 1976 .

[19]  Erhan Erkut,et al.  Analytical models for locating undesirable facilities , 1989 .

[20]  Zvi Drezner,et al.  Location of Multiple Obnoxious Facilities , 1985, Transp. Sci..

[21]  E. Erkut,et al.  Comparison Of Four Models For dispersing Facilities , 1991 .

[22]  Michael Kuby Programming models for facility dispersion: the p-dispersion and maxisum dispersion problems , 1988 .

[23]  Andrew Kusiak,et al.  The facility layout problem , 1987 .

[24]  G. Dantzig Discrete-Variable Extremum Problems , 1957 .

[25]  I. Moon,et al.  An Analysis of Network Location Problems with Distance Constraints , 1984 .

[26]  R. Garfinkel,et al.  Locating an Obnoxious Facility on a Network , 1978 .

[27]  Said Salhi,et al.  The obnoxious p facility network location problem with facility interaction , 1997 .