EMG variability during maximum voluntary isometric and anisometric contractions is reduced using spatial averaging.

Electromyography (EMG) is a commonly used tool that can be plagued with poor signal-to-noise ratios. One result of poor signal-to-noise ratios is increased within- and between-subject variability of quantified EMG variables, for example, the integrated EMG. Methods that reduce within- and between-subject variability of quantified EMG variables can increase the statistical power of an experimental design and aid in the functional interpretation of experimental results. The purpose of this investigation was to determine the effectiveness of spatially averaging the surface EMG signal to reduce the variability of the quantified EMG obtained during maximum voluntary contractions (MVC). The present study extends the work of earlier investigators describing the enhanced signal characteristics obtained by spatially averaging the surface EMG measured during submaximum voluntary isometric contractions and stretch reflexes. Ten subjects performed maximum voluntary isometric and anisometric (concentric and eccentric) contractions of the elbow flexors. Four electrodes, forming two pairs of bipolar electrodes were placed over both the biceps brachii and brachioradialis muscles. Four rectified and integrated EMG signals from the electrode array were compared. Data from each subject's contraction condition and from each muscle were used to compute a coefficient of variation that was considered representative of the within-subject variability. These data were analysed with a multifactorial repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). The results revealed a muscle-specific, statistically significant superiority of one of the methods in reducing the variability of the rectified and integrated EMG signal. Summing the rectified and integrate signals from each bipolar pair of electrodes in the array was shown to reduce significantly the within-subject variability.

[1]  S. Thusneyapan,et al.  A practical electrode-array myoprocessor for surface electromyography , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  A. McComas,et al.  Extent of motor unit activation during effort. , 1981, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[3]  D G Sale,et al.  Neuromuscular adaptation in human thenar muscles following strength training and immobilization. , 1982, Journal of applied physiology: respiratory, environmental and exercise physiology.

[4]  Robert W. Mann,et al.  Myoelectric Signal Processing: Optimal Estimation Applied to Electromyography - Part I: Derivation of the Optimal Myoprocessor , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  S C Gandevia,et al.  Reliability of measurements of muscle strength and voluntary activation using twitch interpolation , 1995, Muscle & nerve.

[6]  J A Daubenspeck,et al.  Diaphragmatic electromyography using a multiple electrode array. , 1989, Journal of applied physiology.

[7]  David M. Andrews,et al.  Are humans able to voluntarily elicit maximum muscle force? , 1994, Neuroscience Letters.

[8]  R D Herbert,et al.  Muscle activation in unilateral and bilateral efforts assessed by motor nerve and cortical stimulation. , 1996, Journal of applied physiology.

[9]  Carlo J. De Luca,et al.  The Use of Surface Electromyography in Biomechanics , 1997 .

[10]  A Thorstensson,et al.  Effects of electrical stimulation on eccentric and concentric torque-velocity relationships during knee extension in man. , 1990, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[11]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Myoelectric Signal Processing: Optimal Estimation Applied to Electromyography - Part II: Experimental Demonstration of Optimal Myoprocessor Performance , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  W. Herzog,et al.  Extent of motor unit activation in the quadriceps muscles of healthy subjects , 1996, Muscle & nerve.

[13]  S. Delp,et al.  Variation of muscle moment arms with elbow and forearm position. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.