Compatibility of Bacillus thuringiensis var. Israelensis and Bacillus sphaericus with the fungal pathogen Lagenidium giganteum (Oomycetes: Lagenidiales).

Larvae of Culex quinquefasciatus were exposed to infection by Lagenidium giganteum and various concentrations of B.t.i. or B. sphaericus. The resulting larval mortalities, percentages of infected dead larvae and percentages of larval body regions containing the fungus were compared. Overall, the effectiveness of Lagenidum giganteum against the larvae was not significantly affected by the presence of B.t.i. or B. sphaericus, and the fungal and bacterial agents were compatible. In experiments using 3-day-old larvae, the extent of growth of the fungus in the infected larvae and the percentage of the larvae infected were related to the concentration of B.t.i. in the range of 0.057-0.456 ITU/ml tested but were not related to the concentration of B. sphaericus in the range of 0.6-4.8 x 10(4) spores/ml. With larvae of various ages treated with a low concentration of B.t.i. (0.114 ITU/ml), exposure to the fungus increased the mortality rate in early but not late instars. After single and multiple applications of B.t.i. and B. sphaericus in the presence of the fungus, followed by drying and reflooding, the fungus persisted and reinfected larvae while the B. sphaericus persisted but the B.t.i. did not.

[1]  L. Lacey,et al.  The medical importance of riceland mosquitoes and their control using alternatives to chemical insecticides. , 1990, Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association. Supplement.

[2]  J. Sattabongkot,et al.  Comparison of development of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. israelensis and Bacillus sphaericus in mosquito larvae. , 1990, Journal of invertebrate pathology.

[3]  C. Rathburn,et al.  Comparative laboratory bioassays of two Bti formulations against malathion resistant and susceptible strains of Aedes taeniorhynchus and Culex quinquefasciatus larvae , 1990 .

[4]  R. Washino,et al.  Field evaluation of Lagenidium giganteum (Oömycetes: Lagenidiales) and description of a natural epizoötic involving a new isolate of the fungus. , 1988, Journal of medical entomology.

[5]  R. Axtell,et al.  Encapsulation of the mosquito fungal pathogen Lagenidium giganteum (Oomycetes:Lagenidiales) in calcium alginate. , 1987, Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association.

[6]  R. Axtell,et al.  Population dynamics of Culex quinquefasciatus and the fungal pathogen Lagenidium giganteum (Oomycetes: Lagenidiales) in stagnant water pools. , 1987, Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association.

[7]  H. Chapman Biological Control of Mosquitoes , 1985 .

[8]  J. Fuxa,et al.  Pathogen–Pathogen and Pathogen–Insecticide Interactions in Velvetbean Caterpillar (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) , 1984 .

[9]  L. Lewis,et al.  Interactions between Vairimorpha necatrix, Vairimorpha sp., and a nuclear polyhedrosis virus from Rachiplusia ou in Agrotis ipsilon larvae☆☆☆ , 1984 .

[10]  E. Davidson,et al.  Microbial control of vectors: a decade of progress. , 1983, Journal of medical entomology.

[11]  J. Fuxa Interactions of the microsporidium Vairimorpha necatrix with a bacterium, virus, and fungus in Heliothis zea , 1979 .