Extended bipolar fuzzy EDAS approach for multi-criteria group decision-making process

In this paper, we apply evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS) approach to multiple criteria group decision-making (MCGDM) with bipolar fuzzy numbers (BFNs). We reconsider the notion of BFNs and propose its corresponding operational rules, score and accuracy functions. Further, we introduce two aggregation operators and develop an MCGDM approach based on conventional EDAS model with overall BFNs. The proposed technique is valid and accurate for considering the conflicting attributes. We analyse the proposed method by considering a numerical example for the selection of road construction company project to show the effectiveness of the developed approach. At last, we compare the developed systems with some existing operators to deliver its efficiency.

[1]  Cherukuri Aswani Kumar,et al.  Bipolar fuzzy graph representation of concept lattice , 2014, Inf. Sci..

[2]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  A Novel Extended EDAS in Minkowski Space (EDAS-M) Method for Evaluating Autonomous Vehicles , 2019, Studies in Informatics and Control.

[3]  Fatih Ecer,et al.  Third-party logistics (3Pls) provider selection via Fuzzy AHP and EDAS integrated model , 2017 .

[4]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets , 2006, Int. J. Gen. Syst..

[5]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  A novel interval-valued neutrosophic EDAS method: prioritization of the United Nations national sustainable development goals , 2018, Soft Comput..

[6]  Fuad E. Alsaadi,et al.  Bipolar 2-tuple linguistic aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making , 2017, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[7]  Dragan Pamucar,et al.  The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC) , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[8]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Selection of carpenter manufacturer using fuzzy EDAS method , 2018, Engineering Economics.

[9]  Jurgita Antucheviciene,et al.  Stochastic EDAS method for multi-criteria decision-making with normally distributed data , 2017, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[10]  Zenonas Turskis,et al.  A novel hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model to assess a stairs shape for dwelling houses , 2016 .

[11]  Cun Wei,et al.  EDAS METHOD FOR MULTIPLE CRITERIA GROUP DECISION MAKING WITH PICTURE FUZZY INFORMATION AND ITS APPLICATION TO GREEN SUPPLIERS SELECTIONS , 2019, Technological and Economic Development of Economy.

[12]  Jurgita Antucheviciene,et al.  A new multi-criteria model based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets and EDAS method for supplier evaluation and order allocation with environmental considerations , 2017, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[13]  Krassimir T. Atanassov,et al.  On Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets Theory , 2012, Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing.

[14]  Chong Liu,et al.  Algorithms for neutrosophic soft decision making based on EDAS, new similarity measure and level soft set , 2018, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[15]  Jie Wang,et al.  Research on Risk Evaluation of Enterprise Human Capital Investment With Interval-Valued Bipolar 2-Tuple Linguistic Information , 2018, IEEE Access.

[16]  Madhumangal Pal,et al.  Bipolar fuzzy Dombi prioritized aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making , 2019, Soft Computing.

[17]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[18]  Bijan Davvaz,et al.  Characterizations of regular ordered semigroups in terms of (α, β)-bipolar fuzzy generalized bi-ideals , 2017, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[19]  Saleem Abdullah,et al.  Bipolar fuzzy soft sets and its applications in decision making problem , 2013, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[20]  Asghar Khan,et al.  Multiple attribute decision making problem using GRA method with incomplete weight information based on picture hesitant fuzzy setting , 2020, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[21]  Zeshui Xu,et al.  Intuitionistic Fuzzy Aggregation Operators , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[22]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Multi-Criteria Inventory Classification Using a New Method of Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) , 2015, Informatica.

[23]  Asghar Khan,et al.  Fuzzy Parameterized Bipolar Fuzzy Soft Expert Set and Its Application in Decision Making , 2019, Int. J. Fuzzy Log. Intell. Syst..

[24]  Saleem Abdullah,et al.  New multicriteria group decision support systems for small hydropower plant locations selection based on intuitionistic cubic fuzzy aggregation information , 2020, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[25]  Fuad E. Alsaadi,et al.  Bipolar Fuzzy Hamacher Aggregation Operators in Multiple Attribute Decision Making , 2017, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems.

[26]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  Interval-Valued Neutrosophic Extension of EDAS Method , 2017, EUSFLAT/IWIFSGN.

[27]  Jurgita Antucheviciene,et al.  A new hybrid fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluation of construction equipment with sustainability considerations , 2018 .

[28]  Dragisa Stanujkic,et al.  An Extension of the EDAS Method Based on the Use of Interval Grey Numbers , 2017 .

[29]  Maurice Yolles,et al.  Collective Emotion Regulation in an Organisation – A Plural Agency with Cognition and Affect , 2015 .

[30]  Zydrune Morkunaite,et al.  A hybrid multiple criteria evaluation method of ranking of cultural heritage structures for renovation projects , 2017 .

[31]  Madhumangal Pal,et al.  Bipolar fuzzy Dombi aggregation operators and its application in multiple-attribute decision-making process , 2018, J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput..

[32]  Lulu Zhang,et al.  YinYang bipolar logic and bipolar fuzzy logic , 2004, Inf. Sci..

[33]  Yanqing Zhang,et al.  MentalSquares: A generic bipolar Support Vector Machine for psychiatric disorder classification, diagnostic analysis and neurobiological data mining , 2011, Int. J. Data Min. Bioinform..

[34]  Morteza Yazdani,et al.  Intuitionistic fuzzy edas method: an application to solid waste disposal site selection , 2017 .

[35]  Huchang Liao,et al.  A consensus-based probabilistic linguistic gained and lost dominance score method , 2019, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[36]  Jiang Wu,et al.  EDAS METHOD FOR MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE GROUP DECISION MAKING UNDER Q-RUNG ORTHOPAIR FUZZY ENVIRONMENT , 2019, Technological and Economic Development of Economy.

[37]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Extended EDAS Method for Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision-making: An Application to Supplier Selection , 2016, Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control.

[38]  Jurgita Antucheviciene,et al.  A Dynamic Fuzzy Approach Based on the EDAS Method for Multi-Criteria Subcontractor Evaluation , 2018, Inf..

[39]  Qi Liu,et al.  EDAS Method for Extended Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Multi-criteria Decision Making , 2018, Int. J. Fuzzy Syst..

[40]  Peter Ping Li,et al.  Global implications of the indigenous epistemological system from the east , 2016 .

[41]  Asghar Khan,et al.  A decision making approach based on multi-fuzzy bipolar soft sets , 2019, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[42]  Rıdvan Şahin,et al.  A Neutrosophic VIKOR Method-Based Decision-Making with an Improved Distance Measure and Score Function: Case Study of Selection for Renewable Energy Alternatives , 2020, Cognitive Computation.

[43]  Ying Han,et al.  Bipolar-Valued Rough Fuzzy Set and Its Applications to the Decision Information System , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[44]  Peide Liu,et al.  Some Hamacher Aggregation Operators Based on the Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Numbers and Their Application to Group Decision Making , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems.

[45]  Muhammad Akram,et al.  Novel Approach in Decision Making with m–Polar Fuzzy ELECTRE-I , 2019, Int. J. Fuzzy Syst..

[46]  Askoldas Podviezko,et al.  Choice of abandoned territories conversion scenario according to MCDA methods , 2018 .