Validation of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) results.

Validation of the results of genome-wide association studies or genomic selection studies is an essential component of the experimental program. Validation allows users to quantify the benefit of applying gene tests or genomic prediction, relative to the costs of implementing the program. Further, if implemented, an appropriate weight in a selection index can only be derived if estimates of the accuracy of genomic predictions are available. In this chapter the reasons for validation are explored, and a range of commonly encountered scenarios described. General principles are stated, and options for performing validation discussed. Designs for validation are heavily dependent on the availability of phenotyped animals, and also on the pedigree structures that characterize the breeding program. Consequently, there is no single plan that is always applicable, and a custom plan often must be developed.

[1]  B. Hayes,et al.  Accuracy of estimated genomic breeding values for wool and meat traits in a multi-breed sheep population , 2010 .

[2]  R. Lande,et al.  Efficiency of marker-assisted selection in the improvement of quantitative traits. , 1990, Genetics.

[3]  S. Moore,et al.  Accuracy of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in crossbred beef cattle. , 2011, Journal of animal science.

[4]  Bruce Tier,et al.  A comparison of five methods to predict genomic breeding values of dairy bulls from genome-wide SNP markers , 2009, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[5]  Andrés Legarra,et al.  Performance of Genomic Selection in Mice , 2008, Genetics.

[6]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Interbull validation test for genomic evaluations , 2010 .

[7]  M. Pereira,et al.  Results of 23 years of selection for post-weaning weight in a Caracu beef herd , 2008 .

[8]  R. M. Koch,et al.  Cumulative selection and genetic change for weaning or yearling weight or for yearling weight plus muscle score in Hereford cattle. , 1994, Journal of animal science.

[9]  J. Woolliams,et al.  The Accuracy of Genomic Selection in Norwegian Red Cattle Assessed by Cross-Validation , 2009, Genetics.

[10]  P. Parnell,et al.  Direct response to divergent selection for yearling growth rate in Angus cattle , 1997 .

[11]  R. Fernando,et al.  Accuracies of genomic breeding values in American Angus beef cattle using K-means clustering for cross-validation , 2011, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[12]  R W Doerge,et al.  Biased estimators of quantitative trait locus heritability and location in interval mapping , 2005, Heredity.

[13]  Martin S. Taylor,et al.  Genome-wide genetic association of complex traits in heterogeneous stock mice , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[14]  M. Goddard,et al.  Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. , 2001, Genetics.

[15]  B. Guldbrandtsen,et al.  Preliminary investigation on reliability of genomic estimated breeding values in the Danish Holstein population. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[16]  G. Moser,et al.  Accuracy of direct genomic values in Holstein bulls and cows using subsets of SNP markers , 2010, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[17]  P. Lichtner,et al.  The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle , 2010, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[18]  W. Barendse,et al.  Fine-mapping the POLL locus in Brahman cattle yields the diagnostic marker CSAFG29. , 2012, Animal genetics.

[19]  P. Ma,et al.  Comparison of genomic predictions using medium-density (∼54,000) and high-density (∼777,000) single nucleotide polymorphism marker panels in Nordic Holstein and Red Dairy Cattle populations. , 2012, Journal of dairy science.

[20]  L. Piper,et al.  Selection of Merino sheep for resistance to Haemonchus contortus: genetic variation. , 1996 .

[21]  M. Shlezinger,et al.  Correcting for bias in estimation of quantitative trait loci effects , 2005, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[22]  Ben J Hayes,et al.  Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations , 2009, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[23]  Shizhong Xu,et al.  Theoretical basis of the Beavis effect. , 2003, Genetics.

[24]  Naomi R. Wray,et al.  Estimating Effects and Making Predictions from Genome-Wide Marker Data , 2010, 1010.4710.