The regulation of ecosystem functions by ecotypic variation in the dominant plant: a Spartina alterniflora salt‐marsh case study

Summary 1 Genetic differences among populations of a keystone species may affect ecosystem functional properties. We tested this by planting Spartina alterniflora from different geographical regions in a newly created salt marsh in Delaware, USA. 2 Spartina alterniflora plants from morphologically distinct short-form (back marsh) populations were originally collected from Massachusetts (41 ° 34 ' N ), Delaware (38 ° 47 ' N ), and Georgia (31 ° 25 ' N ) in the USA and vegetatively propagated for 6 years in a salt water-irrigated common garden in Delaware before transfer to a newly created salt marsh. 3 The magnitude of the expression of marsh functions in the created marsh, measured over 5 years, remained distinct in patches of each ecotype. End of season aerial biomass, below-ground biomass, root and rhizome distribution, canopy height, stem density, and carbohydrate reserves were closer to values reported for the plants' native sites than to those typical of Delaware. Thus, many of the plant features characteristic of particular latitudes appear to be under genetic control. Such ecotypic differentiation influences ecosystem function through keystone resource and keystone modifier activities. 4 Respiration of the microbial community associated with either dead shoots or the soil varied with plant ecotype in the created wetland and the patterns reflected those reported for their native sites. High edaphic respiration under the Massachusetts ecotype was correlated with the high percentage of sugar in the rhizomes. Edaphic chlorophyll was greater under the canopies of the Massachusetts and Delaware ecotypes than under the Georgia canopy and exhibited a relationship similar to that of algal production rates reported for the native sites. Larval fish were most abundant in pit traps in the Massachusetts ecotype.

[1]  D. M. Grant,et al.  Influence of seed source upon phenology of flowering of Spartina alterniflora Loisel and the likelihood of cross pollination , 1981 .

[2]  G. King,et al.  Carbon flow through oxygen and sulfate reduction pathways in salt marsh sediments1 , 1984 .

[3]  M. Sullivan,et al.  Response in production of cord grass,Spartina alterniflora, to inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer , 1974 .

[4]  R. Kneib.  Patterns in the utilization of the intertidal salt marsh by larvae and juveniles of Fundulus heteroclitus (Linnaeus) and Fundulus luciae (Baird) , 1984 .

[5]  C. Keefe.  Marsh production: a summary of the literature. , 1972 .

[6]  R. J. Reimold,et al.  REMOTE SENSING OF TIDAL MARSH , 1973 .

[7]  J. Zieman,et al.  Factors controlling aboveground Spartina alterniflora (Smooth cordgrass) tissue element composition and production in different-age barrier island marshes , 1993 .

[8]  D. W. Freshwater.  Relative genome-size differences among populations of Spartina alterniflora Loisel (Poaceae) along East and Gulf Coasts of U.S.A. , 1988 .

[9]  I. Mendelssohn,et al.  Intraspecific Variation in Salt Tolerance and Morphology in Panicum hemitomon and Spartina alterniflora (Poaceae) , 1998, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[10]  J. L. Gallagher,et al.  Persistent Differences in Two Forms of Spartina Alterniflora: A Common Garden Experiment , 1988 .

[11]  J. Teal,et al.  Gas Transport in the Marsh Grass, Spartina alterniflora , 1966 .

[12]  T. Minello,et al.  Fish predation on juvenile brown shrimp, Penaeus aztecus Ives: The effect of simulated Spartina structure on predation rates , 1983 .

[13]  D. Doak,et al.  The Keystone-Species Concept in Ecology and ConservationManagement and policy must explicitly consider the complexity of interactions in natural systems , 1993 .

[14]  B. L. Howes,et al.  Annual carbon mineralization and belowground production of Spartina alterniflora in a New England salt marsh , 1985 .

[15]  R. Kneib.  PREDATION RISK AND USE OF INTERTIDAL HABITATS BY YOUNG FISHES AND SHRIMP , 1987 .

[16]  R. Zimmerman,et al.  Utilization of natural and transplanted Texas salt marshes by fish and decapod crustaceans , 1992 .

[17]  Joy B. Zedler,et al.  Marsh-creek connectivity: Fish use of a tidal salt marsh in Southern California , 2000 .

[18]  J. L. Gallagher.  EFFECT OF AN AMMONIUM NITRATE PULSE ON THE GROWTH AND ELEMENTAL COMPOSITION OF NATURAL STANDS OF SPARTINA ALTERNIFLORA AND JUNCUS ROEMERIANUS , 1975 .

[19]  T. Laverty,et al.  The effect of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria L.; Lythraceae) on the pollination and reproductive success of sympatric co-flowering wetland plants , 1999 .

[20]  J. Bemiller,et al.  Methods in Carbohydrate Chemistry , 1965 .

[21]  J. Zedler,et al.  Canopy Architecture of Natural and Planted Cordgrass Marshes: Selecting Habitat Evaluation Criteria. , 1993, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[22]  C. Assis,et al.  Do eel grass beds and salt marsh borders act as preferential nurseries and spawning grounds for fish? An example of the Mira estuary in Portugal , 1994 .

[23]  R. Howarth,et al.  Seasonal differences in Spartina recoverable underground reserves in the Great Sippewissett marsh in Massachusetts , 1987 .

[24]  I. Mendelssohn,et al.  Population variation in growth response to flooding of three marsh grasses , 1997 .

[25]  D. Seliskar.  Morphometric variations of five tidal marsh halophytes along environmental gradients , 1985 .

[26]  D. Seliskar.  The Effects of Soil Moisture on Structural and Biomass Characteristics of Four Salt Marsh Plants , 1987 .

[27]  J. Nestler.  Interstitial salinity as a cause of ecophenic variation in Spartina alterniflora , 1977 .

[28]  R. Wiegert,et al.  Productivity Gradients in Salt Marshes: The Response of Spartina Alterniflora to Experimentally Manipulated Soil Water Movement , 1983 .

[29]  E. D. Seneca.  GERMINATION AND SEEDLING RESPONSE OF ATLANTIC AND GULF COASTS POPULATIONS OF SPARTINA ALTERNIFLORA , 1974 .

[30]  J. L. Gallagher,et al.  Exploiting wild population diversity and somaclonal variation in the salt marsh grass Distichlis spicata (Poaceae) for marsh creation and restoration. , 2000, American journal of botany.

[31]  J. Dacey,et al.  Water Uptake by Roots Controls Water Table Movement and Sediment Oxidation in Short Spartina Marsh , 1984, Science.

[32]  J. L. Gallagher,et al.  Underground Biomass Dynamics and Substrate Selective Properties of Atlantic Coastal Salt Marsh Plants. , 1977 .

[33]  S. Weisberg,et al.  The importance of an infrequently flooded intertidal marsh surface as an energy source for the mummichog Fundulus heteroclitus: An experimental approach , 1982 .

[34]  M. Weinstein,et al.  Does the common reed,Phragmites australis, affect essential fish habitat? , 1999 .

[35]  B. L. Howes,et al.  Oxidation‐reduction potentials in a salt marsh: Spatial patterns and interactions with primary production1 , 1981 .

[36]  J. L. Gallagher,et al.  UNDERGROUND BIOMASS PROFILES AND PRODUCTIVITY IN ATLANTIC COASTAL MARSHES , 1979 .

[37]  J. L. Gallagher,et al.  The effects of salinity and flooding on Phragmites australis , 1992 .

[38]  John M. Teal,et al.  Production and dynamics of experimentally enriched salt marsh vegetation: Belowground biomass1 , 1976 .

[39]  Lisa R. Moore,et al.  Physiology and molecular phylogeny of coexisting Prochlorococcus ecotypes , 1998, Nature.

[40]  J. L. Gallagher,et al.  Oxygen consumption at the soil-water interface in a Delaware salt marsh , 1974 .

[41]  W. Wiebe,et al.  Aerobic Microbes and Meiofauna , 1981 .

[42]  I. Mendelssohn,et al.  ELEMENTAL ANALYSIS OF DEPOSITS ON THE ROOTS OF , 1982 .

[43]  J. Zedler,et al.  Site conditions, not parental phenotype, determine the height ofSpartina foliosa , 2000 .

[44]  R. Stalter,et al.  Transplantation of Salt Marsh Vegetation, Georgetown, South Carolina , 1969 .

[45]  R. Neely,et al.  The effects of shading on competition between purple loosestrife and broad-leaved cattail , 1997 .

[46]  Vytautas Klemas,et al.  Relationship between aboveground and belowground biomass ofSpartina alterniflora (Smooth Cordgrass) , 1991 .

[47]  R. S. Alberte,et al.  Photosynthetic and cellular photoadaptive characteristics of three ecotypes of the marine diatom, Skeletonema costatum (Grev.) Cleve , 1985 .

[48]  I. Mendelssohn,et al.  The influence of soil drainage on the growth of salt marsh cordgrass Spartina alterniflora in North Carolina , 1980 .

[49]  J. Teal,et al.  Predation by the salt marsh killifish Fundulus heteroclitus (L.) in relation to prey size and habitat structure: Consequences for prey distribution and abundance , 1976 .

[50]  A. E. Stiven,et al.  Growth, reproduction, and feeding oF Fundulus heteroclitus (L.) on a North Carolina salt marsh , 1978 .

[51]  G. King,et al.  Relation of Soil Water Movement and Sulfide Concentration to Spartina alterniflora Production in a Georgia Salt Marsh , 1982, Science.

[52]  R. Wiegert,et al.  Tidal salt marshes of the Southeast Atlantic Coast: a community profile , 1990 .

[53]  D. Charlène,et al.  Production of epibenthic salt marsh algae: Light and nutrient limitation1 , 1976 .

[54]  K. Able,et al.  Salt-marsh tide pools as winter refuges for the mummichog,Fundulus heteroclitus, in New Jersey , 1994 .

[55]  D. E. Whitney,et al.  Effect of light intensity upon salt marsh benthic microalgal photosynthesis , 1983 .

[56]  E. D. Seneca,et al.  Aeration, nitrogen and salinity as determinants of Spartina alterniflora Loisel. Growth response , 1981 .

[57]  J. L. Gallagher,et al.  Primary production of edaphic algal communities in a Delaware salt marsh1 , 1974 .