Chemical Similarity and Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) Approaches: Report of an ECB Workshop held in Ispra, November 2005

There are many national, regional and international programmes – either regulatory or voluntary – to assess the hazards or risks of chemical substances to humans and the environment. The first step in making a hazard assessment of a chemical is to ensure that there is adequate information on each of the endpoints. If adequate information is not available then additional data is needed to complete the dataset for this substance. For reasons of resources and animal welfare, it is important to limit the number of tests that have to be conducted, where this is scientifically justifiable. One approach is to consider closely related chemicals as a group, or chemical category, rather than as individual chemicals. In a category approach, data for chemicals and endpoints that have been already tested are used to estimate the hazard for untested chemicals and endpoints. Categories of chemicals are selected on the basis of similarities in biological activity which is associated with a common underlying mechanism of action. A homologous series of chemicals exhibiting a coherent trend in biological activity can be rationalised on the basis of a constant change in structure. This type of grouping is relatively straightforward. The challenge lies in identifying the relevant chemical structural and physicochemical characteristics that enable more sophisticated groupings to be made on the basis of similarity in biological activity and hence purported mechanism of action. Linking two chemicals together and rationalising their similarity with reference to one or more endpoints has been very much carried out on an ad hoc basis. Even with larger groups, the process and approach is ad hoc and based on expert judgement. There still appears to be very little guidance about the tools and approaches for grouping chemicals systematically. In November 2005, the ECB Workshop on Chemical Similarity and Thresholds of Toxicological Concern (TTC) Approaches was convened to identify the available approaches that currently exist to encode similarity and how these can be used to facilitate the grouping of chemicals. This report aims to capture the main themes that were discussed. In particular, it outlines a number of different approaches that can facilitate the formation of chemical groupings in terms of the context under consideration and the likely information that would be required. Grouping methods were divided into one of four classes – knowledge-based, analogue-based, unsupervised, and supervised. A flowchart was constructed to attempt to capture a possible work flow to highlight where and how these approaches might be best applied.

[1]  R. Benigni Structure-activity relationship studies of chemical mutagens and carcinogens: mechanistic investigations and prediction approaches. , 2005, Chemical reviews.

[2]  K. Landsteiner,et al.  STUDIES ON THE SENSITIZATION OF ANIMALS WITH SIMPLE CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS. II , 1936, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[3]  I Kimber,et al.  The murine local lymph node assay: a commentary on collaborative studies and new directions. , 1992, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[4]  Vicki Dellarco,et al.  Use of mechanism-based structure-activity relationships analysis in carcinogenic potential ranking for drinking water disinfection by-products. , 2002, Environmental health perspectives.

[5]  Efraim Halfon,et al.  Comparison of an index function and a vectorial approach method for ranking waste disposal sites , 1989 .

[6]  David W. Roberts,et al.  QSARs for the skin sensitization potential of aldehydes and related compounds , 2003 .

[7]  D. Roberts,et al.  The value of the local lymph node assay in quantitative structure‐activity investigations , 1992, Contact dermatitis.

[8]  Grace Patlewicz,et al.  Skin sensitization: reaction mechanistic applicability domains for structure-activity relationships. , 2005, Chemical research in toxicology.

[9]  C Smith Pease,et al.  From xenobiotic chemistry and metabolism to better prediction and risk assessment of skin allergy , 2003 .

[10]  J. Hermens,et al.  Classifying environmental pollutants: Part 3. External validation of the classification system. , 2000, Chemosphere.

[11]  Ian Kimber,et al.  What makes a chemical an allergen? , 2003, Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology.

[12]  Ian Kimber,et al.  Factors influencing the induction phase of skin sensitization. , 2003, American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society.

[13]  Ian Kimber,et al.  Compilation of Historical Local Lymph Node Data for Evaluation of Skin Sensitization Alternative Methods , 2005, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug.

[14]  Grace Patlewicz,et al.  Mechanistic applicability domains for non-animal based prediction of toxicological endpoints. QSAR analysis of the schiff base applicability domain for skin sensitization. , 2006, Chemical research in toxicology.

[15]  Marcello G. Reggiani,et al.  On ranking chemicals for environmental hazard , 1986 .

[16]  D A Basketter,et al.  Contact allergy: the role of skin chemistry and metabolism , 2003, Clinical and experimental dermatology.

[17]  D A Basketter,et al.  An expert system rulebase for identifying contact allergens. , 1994, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[18]  J. Hermens,et al.  Classifying environmental pollutants , 1992 .

[19]  I. Kimber,et al.  Use of the local lymph node assay for the estimation of relative contact allergenic potency , 2000, Contact dermatitis.

[20]  David J. Livingstone,et al.  Data analysis for chemists , 1995 .

[21]  R A Ford,et al.  Estimation of toxic hazard--a decision tree approach. , 1978, Food and cosmetics toxicology.

[22]  D W Roberts,et al.  The derivation of quantitative correlations between skin sensitisation and physio-chemical parameters for alkylating agents, and their application to experimental data for sultones. , 1982, Journal of theoretical biology.

[23]  Rainer Brüggemann,et al.  A Theoretical Concept To Rank Environmentally Significant Chemicals , 1999, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[24]  Rainer Brüggemann,et al.  Applying the Concept of Partially Ordered Sets on the Ranking of Near-Shore Sediments by a Battery of Tests , 2001, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[25]  David W Roberts,et al.  Mechanistic applicability domains for nonanimal-based prediction of toxicological end points: general principles and application to reactive toxicity. , 2006, Chemical research in toxicology.

[26]  J. Ashby Fundamental structural alerts to potential carcinogenicity or noncarcinogenicity. , 1985, Environmental mutagenesis.

[27]  Grace Patlewicz,et al.  Non-enzymatic glutathione reactivity and in vitro toxicity: a non-animal approach to skin sensitization. , 2006, Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA.

[28]  Manuela Pavan,et al.  The Characterisation of (Quantitative) Structure-Activity Relationships: Preliminary Guidance , 2005 .