Do Web 2.0 tools really open the door to learning? Practices, perceptions and profiles of 11–16‐year‐old students

In this paper, we report on survey and focus group data relating to the activities and perceptions of learning with Web 2.0 technologies of students aged between 11 and 16 years in 27 UK secondary schools. The study confirms that these learners had high levels of access to Web 2.0 technologies and that Web 2.0 activities were prolific. However, patterns of use were complex. The types of activity evidenced by the study suggest that learners can be categorised into four main groups: (1) researchers: mainly in terms of reading with little evidence of critical enquiry or analytical awareness; (2) collaborators: mainly with respect to file sharing, gaming and communicating; (3) producers and (4) publishers: mainly in terms of sharing experience through social networking sites. Whilst most expressed an interest in using online technologies to support familiar school activities, such as presentations or for communication, learners seemed cautious about other values associated with Web 2.0 tools, such as the shared construction of knowledge in a public format. Few learners were familiar with the complete spectrum of Web 2.0 activities and only a small number were engaging in more sophisticated activities, such as producing and publishing self‐created content for wider consumption. There was little evidence of groundbreaking activities and only a few embryonic signs of criticality, self‐management or metacognitive reflection. The paper concludes that these higher order thinking skills need to be encouraged and supported in any attempt to use Web 2.0 for learning in formal education.

[1]  Elizabeth A Hartnell-Young,et al.  How mobile phones help learning in secondary schools , 2008 .

[2]  J. Flavell Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive-Developmental Inquiry. , 1979 .

[3]  Amanda A. Madden Teen Content Creators and Consumers , 2005 .

[4]  A. Brown Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms , 1987 .

[5]  Nigel Ecclesfield,et al.  Learner Generated Contexts : a framework to support the effective use of technology to support learning , 2022 .

[6]  J. V. Dijk,et al.  The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society , 2005 .

[7]  Hannah Green,et al.  Their Space. Education for a Digital Generation , 2007 .

[8]  James Paul Gee,et al.  What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy , 2007, CIE.

[9]  Andrew Whitworth,et al.  Learner-Generated Contexts: A Framework to Support the Effective Use of Technology for Learning , 2011, SocInfo 2011.

[10]  M. Goos,et al.  Socially mediated metacognition: creating collaborative zones of proximal development in small group problem solving , 2002 .

[11]  Panagiota Alevizou,et al.  Beyond Technology: Children's Learning in the Age of Digital Culture , 2007 .

[12]  Martin Oliver,et al.  Learning to play in digital games , 2006 .

[13]  Neil Selwyn,et al.  Exploring the ‘digital disconnect’ between net‐savvy students and their schools , 2006 .

[14]  Rosemary Luckin,et al.  Beyond Web 2.0: mapping the technology landscapes of young learners , 2009, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[15]  Henry Jenkins Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century , 2006 .

[16]  D. Kuhn Metacognitive Development , 2000 .

[17]  Brian Fitzgerald,et al.  Mashups, remixes and copyright law , 2006 .

[18]  Colin Lankshear,et al.  Weblog worlds and constructions of effective and powerful writing: cross with care, and only where signs permit , 2006 .

[19]  Colin Lankshear,et al.  Digital Literacy and Digital Literacies: - Policy, Pedagogy and Research Considerations for Education , 2006 .