Functional analysis of the periphery effect in human building related areas

Several studies have shown that a region in the anterior collateral sulcus (CoS) and a region in the vicinity of the transverse occipital sulcus (TOS) are preferentially activated by images of buildings and scenes. We have found recently that these regions show a strong activation bias to stimuli located in the peripheral visual field. We explore in detail the source of this “periphery” effect. Our results show that the periphery effect can be generated by a large single object occupying the peripheral visual field as well as by multiple small peripheral objects. We also investigated whether the periphery effect was related to the annular shape used in conventional mapping of the visual field periphery and found that the mere presence of a stimulus in the visual field periphery, regardless of object shape, is sufficient to enhance activation. We also found that a small bias toward the peripheral visual field was shown even when the stimulated areas in the central and peripheral parts of the visual field are equated. Finally, our results demonstrate that the periphery effect shows object selectivity that can be obtained even with face images, which are the non‐optimal stimulus for this region. In summary, our study shows that the building‐related CoS and TOS manifest a true but graded retinotopic bias toward the peripheral visual field. Hum. Brain Mapp. 22:17–28, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  A. Dale,et al.  The representation of the ipsilateral visual field in human cerebral cortex. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Z Kourtzi,et al.  Representation of Perceived Object Shape by the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 2001, Science.

[3]  K. Grill-Spector The neural basis of object perception , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[4]  E. DeYoe,et al.  Mapping striate and extrastriate visual areas in human cerebral cortex. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  J W Belliveau,et al.  Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1995, Science.

[6]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Multisubject fMRI Studies and Conjunction Analyses , 1999, NeuroImage.

[7]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Improved Assessment of Significant Activation in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): Use of a Cluster‐Size Threshold , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The Effect of Face Inversion on Activity in Human Neural Systems for Face and Object Perception , 1999, Neuron.

[11]  Rafael Malach,et al.  Large-Scale Mirror-Symmetry Organization of Human Occipito-Temporal Object Areas , 2003, Neuron.

[12]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  How Distributed Is Visual Category Information in Human Occipito-Temporal Cortex? An fMRI Study , 2002, Neuron.

[13]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  An Area within Human Ventral Cortex Sensitive to “Building” Stimuli Evidence and Implications , 1998, Neuron.

[14]  E. Halgren,et al.  Location of human face‐selective cortex with respect to retinotopic areas , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[15]  Talma Hendler,et al.  Eccentricity Bias as an Organizing Principle for Human High-Order Object Areas , 2002, Neuron.

[16]  Adrian T. Lee,et al.  fMRI of human visual cortex , 1994, Nature.

[17]  J. Lund,et al.  Compulsory averaging of crowded orientation signals in human vision , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  N. Kanwisher Domain specificity in face perception , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  Talma Hendler,et al.  Center–periphery organization of human object areas , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[21]  T. Allison,et al.  Face-Specific Processing in the Human Fusiform Gyrus , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  S. Edelman,et al.  Human Brain Mapping 6:316–328(1998) � A Sequence of Object-Processing Stages Revealed by fMRI in the Human Occipital Lobe , 2022 .

[23]  Paul E. Downing,et al.  Viewpoint-Specific Scene Representations in Human Parahippocampal Cortex , 2003, Neuron.

[24]  Talma Hendler,et al.  Analysis of the Neuronal Selectivity Underlying Low fMRI Signals , 2002, Current Biology.

[25]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Environmental Knowledge Is Subserved by Separable Dorsal/Ventral Neural Areas , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  Talma Hendler,et al.  Vase or face? A neural correlate of shape-selective grouping processes in the human brain , 2001, NeuroImage.

[27]  T. Allison,et al.  Face-sensitive regions in human extrastriate cortex studied by functional MRI. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[29]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition , 2001, Vision Research.

[30]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  A cortical representation of the local visual environment , 1998, Nature.

[31]  A. Ishai,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Representations of Faces and Objects in Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2001, Science.