Language and thought in bilinguals: The case of grammatical number and nonverbal classification preferences

ABSTRACT Recent research shows that speakers of languages with obligatory plural marking (English) preferentially categorize objects based on common shape, whereas speakers of nonplural-marking classifier languages (Yucatec and Japanese) preferentially categorize objects based on common material. The current study extends that investigation to the domain of bilingualism. Japanese and English monolinguals, and Japanese–English bilinguals were asked to match novel objects based on either common shape or color. Results showed that English monolinguals selected shape significantly more than Japanese monolinguals, whereas the bilinguals shifted their cognitive preferences as a function of their second language proficiency. The implications of these findings for conceptual representation and cognitive processing in bilinguals are discussed.

[1]  Robert L. Goldstone.  Learning to Perceive While Perceiving to Learn , 2003 .

[2]  Barbara Landau,et al.  The effects of spatial language on spatial representation: Setting some boundaries , 2003 .

[3]  Laura A. Carlson,et al.  Functional Features in Language and Space - Insights from Perception, Categorization, and Development , 2005, Functional Features in Language and Space.

[4]  E. Hunt,et al.  The Whorfian Hypothesis: A Cognitive Psychology Perspective , 1991 .

[5]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Reuniting perception and conception , 1998, Cognition.

[6]  Panos Athanasopoulos,et al.  Effects of the grammatical representation of number on cognition in bilinguals , 2006, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[7]  P. Kay,et al.  The linguistic significance of the meanings of basic color terms , 1978 .

[8]  Sarah Ellen Ransdell,et al.  Bilingual long-term working memory: The effects of working memory loads on writing quality and fluency , 2001, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[9]  Silvia P. Gennari,et al.  Motion events in language and cognition , 2002, Cognition.

[10]  J. Lucy,et al.  Language acquisition and conceptual development: Grammatical categories and the development of classification preferences: a comparative approach , 2001 .

[11]  Lauren A. Schmidt,et al.  Sex, syntax and semantics. , 2003 .

[12]  Maria D. Sera,et al.  Grammatical and conceptual forces in the attribution of gender by English and Spanish speakers , 1994 .

[13]  S. Ervin,et al.  Semantic shift in bilingualism. , 1961, The American journal of psychology.

[14]  Linda S. Siegel,et al.  The development of reading in English and Italian in bilingual children , 2001, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[15]  Susan Goldin-Meadow,et al.  The effects of learning two languages on levels of metalinguistic awareness , 1990, Cognition.

[16]  G. Chierchia,et al.  Reference to Kinds across Language , 1998 .

[17]  Alison J. Wiggett,et al.  Is color “categorical perception” really perceptual? , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[18]  J. Davidoff,et al.  Color categories are not universal: replications and new evidence from a stone-age culture. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[19]  G. Yelland,et al.  The metalinguistic benefits of limited contact with a second language , 1993, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[20]  D. Gentner,et al.  A cross-linguistic study of early word meaning: universal ontology and linguistic influence , 1997, Cognition.

[21]  S. Levinson,et al.  Returning the tables: language affects spatial reasoning , 2002, Cognition.

[22]  W. Schmidt,et al.  Cultural Differences in Color/Form Preference and in Classificatory Behavior. , 1970 .

[23]  S. Levinson,et al.  LANGUAGE AND SPACE , 1996 .

[24]  Barbara Landau,et al.  Shape, material, and syntax: Interacting forces in children's learning in novel words for objects and substances , 1999 .

[25]  Steven A. Sloman,et al.  How bilinguals solve the naming problem , 2005 .

[26]  Brian J. Rogosky,et al.  Adaptation of Perceptual and Semantic Features , 2005, Functional Features in Language and Space.

[27]  A. Pavlenko.  New approaches to concepts in bilingual memory , 2000, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[28]  S. Levinson,et al.  Rethinking Linguistic Relativity , 1991, Current Anthropology.

[29]  S. Levinson,et al.  Can language restructure cognition? The case for space , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  E. Bialystok.  Cognitive Complexity and Attentional Control in the Bilingual Mind , 1999 .

[31]  L. Boroditsky.  Does Language Shape Thought?: Mandarin and English Speakers' Conceptions of Time , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[32]  Paul T. Sowden,et al.  The nature of learned categorical perception effects: a psychophysical approach , 2005, Cognition.

[33]  J. Lucy,et al.  Grammatical categories and cognition: References , 1992 .

[34]  E. Bialystok,et al.  Developing phonological awareness: Is there a bilingual advantage? , 2003, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[35]  Vivian Cook,et al.  Do bilinguals have different concepts? The case of shape and material in Japanese L2 users of English , 2006 .

[36]  R. Serpell.  Cultural Differences in Attentional Preference for Colour Over Form , 1969 .

[37]  D. W. Green,et al.  BILINGUALISM AND THOUGHT , 1998 .

[38]  D. Slobin.  LANGUAGE AND THOUGHT ONLINE: COGNITIVE CONSEQUENCES OF LINGUISTIC RELATIVITY , 2003 .

[39]  Suzanne Gaskins,et al.  Interaction of language type and referent type in the development of nonverbal classification preferences , 2003 .

[40]  Mutsumi Imai,et al.  Re-evaluating linguistic relativity: Language-specific categories and the role of universal ontological knowledge in the construal of individuation , 2003 .

[41]  D. Gentner,et al.  Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought , 2003 .

[42]  J. Kroll,et al.  Tutorials in bilingualism : psycholinguistic perspectives , 1999 .

[43]  S. Levinson,et al.  Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development , 2001 .

[44]  F. Craik,et al.  Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: evidence from the Simon task. , 2004, Psychology and aging.

[45]  M. Sera,et al.  When language affects cognition and when it does not: an analysis of grammatical gender and classification. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[46]  E. Bialystok,et al.  Bilingualism across the lifespan: The rise and fall of inhibitory control , 2005 .

[47]  J. Davidoff,et al.  The categorical perception of colors and facial expressions: The effect of verbal interference , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[48]  P. Gordon.  Numerical Cognition Without Words: Evidence from Amazonia , 2004, Science.

[49]  I. Davies,et al.  Acquisition of categorical color perception: a perceptual learning approach to the linguistic relativity hypothesis. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[50]  T. Vance,et al.  Japanese/Korean linguistics , 1999 .

[51]  Jules Davidoff,et al.  The development of color categories in two languages: a longitudinal study. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[52]  Mutsurni Irnai,et al.  A cross-linguistic study of early word meaning : universal ontology and linguistic influence , 1994 .

[53]  J. Fishman.  A systematization of the Whorfian hypothesis , 2007 .

[54]  Pamela A. Downing.  Numeral Classifier Systems: The Case of Japanese , 1996 .

[55]  S. Levinson.  Frames of reference and Molyneux's question: Cross-linguistic evidence , 1996 .

[56]  Vivian Cook,et al.  Portraits of the L2 User , 2002 .

[57]  E. Spelke,et al.  Ontological categories guide young children's inductions of word meaning: Object terms and substance terms , 1991, Cognition.

[58]  J. Lucy,et al.  Grammatical categories and cognition , 1992 .

[59]  R. Kimchi,et al.  Perceptual organization in vision : behavioral and neural perspectives , 2003 .

[60]  M. Garman.  Psycholinguistics , 1992 .

[61]  J. Davidoff,et al.  Colour categories in a stone-age tribe , 1999, Nature.

[62]  D. Slobin.  The Crosslinguistic Study of Language Acquisition , 1987 .

[63]  D. Slobin.  From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking” , 1996 .

[64]  Debi Roberson,et al.  Color Categories Are Culturally Diverse in Cognition as Well as in Language , 2005 .