Pilot scale recovery of monoclonal antibodies by expanded bed ion exchange adsorption.

The aim of the investigations was to estimate the scale up properties of an efficient chromatographic first capture step for the recovery of murine IgG1 from undiluted and unclarified hybridoma cell culture broth using an ion exchange matrix in expanded bed mode. The tested new sulfopropyl-based ion exchange matrix (StreamlineTM SP XL, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) stands out due to its enhanced capacity compared to its precursor (StreamlineTM SP). Defining the working pH in preliminary electrophoretic analyses (titration curve, SDS-PAGE) and small-scaled chromatographic binding studies showed, that the optimal value for the IgG purification was pH 4.6, where a co-chromatography of the medium supplement albumin (500 mg l-1, pI = 4.8) could not be avoided. Further scouting experiments dealt with the dynamic capacity of the matrix, which was evaluated by frontal adsorption analysis. In packed bed mode no break-through of the target protein was achieved even after 6.5 mg IgG per ml matrix were applied. These results could not be reproduced in expanded bed mode with cell-free supernatant, where the dynamic capacity was found to be only 1.5 mg IgG/ml SP XL. Processing cell-containing broth resulted in an additional decrease of the value down to 0.5 mg ml-1, presumably caused by the remarkable biomass adsorption to the matrix. The search for the reasons led to the examination of the hydrodynamic conditions. Buffer experiments with a tracer substance (acetone) pointed out, that the flow in expanded bed was significantly more influenced by back-mixing effects and channel formations than in packed bed. These effects could be compensated with an enhanced viscosity of the liquid phase, which was achieved by the addition of glucose. As a result of the improved hydrodynamic conditions in the expanded bed, the dynamic capacity could be increased from 0.5 to more than 4.5 mg IgG/ml matrix for the processing of cell culture broth with 400 mM glucose. Finally, the scale up from a StreamlineTM 25 to a StreamlineTM 200 column was performed under conditions, which proved to be optimal: 100 L of unclarified hybridoma broth were concentrated with a binding rate of 95% in less than 3.5 hours. Loading the column no break-through of the target protein was achieved. However, the eluate still contained debris and cells, which points out the major disadvantage of the method: the biomass attachment to the matrix.

[1]  C. Goochee Bioprocess factors affecting glycoprotein oligosaccharide structure. , 1992, Developments in biological standardization.

[2]  Koji Ikura,et al.  Animal Cell Culture and Production of Biologicals , 1991, Springer Netherlands.

[3]  R Hjorth,et al.  Pilot scale recovery of recombinant annexin V from unclarified escherichia coli homogenate using expanded bed adsorption , 1994, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[4]  V. Jäger,et al.  Proteolytic Activities in Serum-Free Supernatants of Mammalian Cell Lines , 1991 .

[5]  O. Levenspiel Chemical Reaction Engineering , 1972 .

[6]  C. Milstein,et al.  Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity , 1975, Nature.

[7]  M. Kula,et al.  The influence of particle size distribution and operating conditions on the adsorption performance in fluidized beds. , 1997, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[8]  J Thömmes,et al.  Fluidized bed adsorption as a primary recovery step in protein purification. , 1997, Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology.

[9]  K. Holmes,et al.  Monoclonal antibodies for diagnosis of infectious diseases in humans. , 1983, Science.

[10]  M. S. Le,et al.  Fouling of microporous membranes in biological applications , 1989 .

[11]  R. Dernick,et al.  Improved silver staining procedure for fast staining in PhastSystem Development Unit. I. Staining of sodium dodecyl sulfate gels , 1988, Electrophoresis.

[12]  D. Lütkemeyer,et al.  Membrane chromatography for rapid purification of recombinant antithrombin III and monoclonal antibodies from cell culture supernatant. , 1993, Journal of chromatography.

[13]  Draeger Nm,et al.  Liquid fluidized bed adsorption of protein in the presence of cells. , 1991 .

[14]  R Hjorth,et al.  Expanded-bed adsorption in industrial bioprocessing: recent developments. , 1997, Trends in biotechnology.

[15]  J. Shiloach,et al.  Large scale recovery and purification of periplasmic recombinant protein from E. coli using expanded bed adsorption chromatography followed by new ion exchange media. , 1996, Journal of biotechnology.

[16]  H. Chase,et al.  Purification of proteins by adsorption chromatography in expanded beds. , 1994, Trends in biotechnology.

[17]  H. Chase,et al.  Development of operating conditions for protein purification using expanded bed techniques: The effect of the degree of bed expansion on adsorption performance , 2000, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[18]  A. Füchtbauer,et al.  Probing the Cytoskeleton by Microinjection , 1986 .

[19]  R. Arshady Beaded polymer supports and gels: I. Manufacturing techniques , 1991 .

[20]  J. Lehmann,et al.  Bubble free cell culture aeration with porous moving membranes. , 1987, Developments in biological standardization.