Enduring interest in perceptual ambiguity: alternating views of reversible figures.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] N. Logothetis,et al. Neuronal correlates of subjective visual perception. , 1989, Science.
[2] V. Ruggieri,et al. Gaze Orientation in Perception of Reversible Figures , 1994, Perceptual and motor skills.
[3] V R FISICHELLI. Reversible perspective in Lissajous figures; some theoretical considerations. , 1947, The American journal of psychology.
[4] Stanley Coren,et al. In Sensation and perception , 1979 .
[5] J. Frisby. Seeing: Illusion, Brain and Mind , 1979 .
[6] L. Maffei,et al. Neural Correlate of Perceptual Adaptation to Gratings , 1973, Science.
[7] B. Philip,et al. Effect of speed of rotation and complexity of pattern on the reversals of apparent movement in Lissajou figures. , 1945, The American journal of psychology.
[8] A. Wolters,et al. Dynamics in Psychology , 1943, Nature.
[9] J. Harris,et al. How does adaptation to disparity affect the perception of reversible figures? , 1980, The American journal of psychology.
[10] M. Grünau,et al. The local character of perspective organization , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.
[11] M. Posner,et al. Attention and the detection of signals. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology.
[12] L. H. Pelton,et al. Acceleration of reversals of a Necker cube. , 1968, The American journal of psychology.
[13] I Rock,et al. Why do ambiguous figures reverse? , 1994, Acta psychologica.
[14] D. Reisberg,et al. Diverting Subjects' Concentration Slows Figural Reversals , 1984, Perception.
[15] C. Blundo,et al. Perception of ambiguous figures after focal brain lesions , 1990, Neuropsychologia.
[16] B. Gillam. Perceived common rotary motion of ambiguous stimuli as a criterion of perceptual grouping , 1972 .
[17] E. Boring. Sensation and Perception. (Scientific Books: Sensation and Perception in the History of Experimental Psychology) , 1943 .
[18] Fisichelli Vr. Reversible perspective in Lissajous figures; some theoretical considerations. , 1947 .
[19] Mefferd Rb,et al. Effects of pretraining and instructions on validity of perceptual reports by inexperienced observers. , 1968 .
[20] The Original of E G Boring's ‘Young Girl/Mother-in-Law’ Drawing and its Relation to the Pattern of a Joke , 1992, Perception.
[21] Ronald A. Rensink,et al. Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[22] Y. Tsal. Effects of Attention on Perception of Features and Figural Organisation , 1994, Perception.
[23] G M Long,et al. To reverse or not to reverse: when is an ambiguous figure not ambiguous? , 1999, The American journal of psychology.
[24] Nobuo Kawabata,et al. Visual fixation points and depth perception , 1978, Vision Research.
[25] K. Lashley,et al. An examination of the electrical field theory of cerebral integration. , 1951, Psychological review.
[26] J. C. Angulo,et al. Timing and Competition in Networks Representing Ambiguous Figures , 1995, Brain and Cognition.
[27] D Vickers,et al. A Cyclic Decision Model of Perceptual Alternation , 1972, Perception.
[28] Thomas C. Toppino,et al. Evidence for a hybrid model of reversible-figure effects , 1997 .
[29] M. M. Taylor,et al. Stochastic processes in reversing figure perception , 1974 .
[30] E. Capaldi,et al. The organization of behavior. , 1992, Journal of applied behavior analysis.
[31] Timothy J Andrews,et al. Binocular rivalry and visual awareness , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[32] W. R. Klemm,et al. Coherent EEG Indicators of Cognitive Binding during Ambiguous Figure Tasks , 2000, Consciousness and Cognition.
[33] E. Boring. A new ambiguous figure. , 1930 .
[34] VEIJO VIRSU,et al. Determination of perspective reversals , 1975, Nature.
[35] F. Attneave. Triangles as ambiguous figures. , 1968, The American journal of psychology.
[36] A. Parker,et al. Perceptually Bistable Three-Dimensional Figures Evoke High Choice Probabilities in Cortical Area MT , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[37] D. Reisberg,et al. General mental resources and perceptual judgments. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[38] E. Schonne,et al. Antibody production in bursectomized chickens after injection of bacteriophage phi X 174. , 1968, Life sciences. Pt. 2: Biochemistry, general and molecular biology.
[39] David A. Leopold,et al. Stable perception of visually ambiguous patterns , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.
[40] John R. Price. Perspective duration of a plane reversible figure , 1967 .
[41] C Blakemore,et al. On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images , 1969, The Journal of physiology.
[42] P. Brugger,et al. One Hundred Years of an Ambiguous Figure: Happy Birthday, Duck/Rabbit! , 1999, Perceptual and motor skills.
[43] C. A. Burnham,et al. The first glimpse determines the perception of an ambiguous figure , 1975 .
[44] David L. Sheinberg,et al. The role of temporal cortical areas in perceptual organization. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[45] D. Navon. Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.
[46] G. Long,et al. Configural biases and reversible figures: evidence of multilevel grouping effects. , 2002, American Journal of Psychology.
[47] Bradley S Gibson,et al. Directing spatial attention within an object: altering the functional equivalence of shape descriptions. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[48] Thomas C. Toppino,et al. As the cube turns: Evidence for two processes in the perception of a dynamic reversible figure , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.
[49] V. R. Carlson. Satiation in a reversible perspective figure. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.
[50] J. R. Price. Studies of reversible perspective: A methodological review , 1968 .
[51] P. O. Bishop,et al. Spatial vision. , 1971, Annual review of psychology.
[52] Janette Atkinson,et al. Channels in Vision: Basic Aspects , 1978 .
[53] K. M. Dallenbach. A puzzle-picture with a new principle of concealment. , 1951, The American journal of psychology.
[54] I. Rock,et al. An introduction to perception , 1975 .
[55] F. Attneave. Multistability in perception. , 1971, Scientific American.
[56] G. Shulman. Attentional modulation of mechanisms that analyze rotation in depth , 1991 .
[57] Y. Tsal,et al. Disambiguating Ambiguous Figures by Selective Attention , 1985 .
[58] G. H. Fisher,et al. Ambiguity of form: Old and new , 1968 .
[59] Laurie A. Miller,et al. Perceptual flexibility after frontal or temporal lobectomy , 1994, Neuropsychologia.
[60] Kate Gordon. Meaning in memory and in attention. , 1903 .
[61] J. Beer. Learning Effects While Passively Viewing the Necker Cube , 1989, Perceptual and motor skills.
[62] Julien C Sprott,et al. The Role of Depth and 1/f Dynamics in Perceiving Reversible Figures , 2003, Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences.
[63] I Rock,et al. Further Evidence of Failure of Reversal of Ambiguous Figures by Uninformed Subjects , 1992, Perception.
[64] C. M. Solley,et al. Perceptual Learning with Partial Verbal Reinforcement , 1958 .
[65] R. S. J. Frackowiak,et al. Human brain activity during spontaneously reversing perception of ambiguous figures , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[66] J. Hochberg. Figure-ground reversal as a function of visual satiation. , 1950 .
[67] Richard L. Gregory,et al. CHOOSING A PARADIGM FOR PERCEPTION , 1974 .
[68] Thomas C. Toppino,et al. Reversible-figure perception: Mechanisms of intentional control , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.
[69] Effects of Practice on Reversals of Incomplete Necker Cubes , 1968, Perceptual and motor skills.
[70] M. Stadler,et al. Ambiguity in Mind and Nature , 1995 .
[71] S. Eure,et al. Reversible figures and eye-movements. , 1956, The American journal of psychology.
[72] Carlson Vr. Satiation in a reversible perspective figure. , 1953 .
[73] Margaret Floy Washburn,et al. The Influence of the Size of an Outline Cube on the Fluctuations of Its Perspective , 1931 .
[74] Harris Jp,et al. How does adaptation to disparity affect the perception of reversible figures , 1980 .
[75] Massimo Riani,et al. Effects of Visual Angle on Perspective Reversal for Ambiguous Patterns , 1982, Perception.
[76] D. Hubel,et al. Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex , 1959, The Journal of physiology.
[77] Daniel Strüber,et al. Slow Positive Potentials in the EEG During Multistable Visual Perception , 1995 .
[78] H. K. Mull,et al. Indications of a central factor in uncontrolled and controlled shifts in cube perspective. , 1952, The American journal of psychology.
[79] Gunther W. Balz,et al. Bistability and hysteresis in the organization of apparent motion patterns. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[80] Norma Graham. Breaking the Visual Stimulus Into Parts , 1992 .
[81] G. M. Long,et al. A New Twist on the Rotating-Trapezoid Illusion: Evidence for Neural-Adaptation Effects , 1994, Perception.
[82] R. Gregory. The intelligent eye , 1970 .
[83] I. Rock,et al. The effect of knowledge of reversibility on the reversibility of ambiguous figures , 1977 .
[84] R. Lipman,et al. Some Factors Affecting Necker Cube Reversal Rate , 1962, Perceptual and motor skills.
[85] R. Lynn. Reversible perspective as a function of stimulus-intensity. , 1961, American Journal of Psychology.
[86] M. Washburn,et al. Motor Factors in Voluntary Control of Cube Perspective Fluctuations and Retinal Rivalry Fluctuations , 1933 .
[87] D. Cipywnyk. Effect of degree of illumination on rate of ambiguous figure reversal. , 1959, Canadian journal of psychology.
[88] L. Cohen,et al. Perception of reversible figures after brain injury. , 1959, A.M.A. archives of neurology and psychiatry.
[89] K. D. Valois. Spatial frequency adaptation can enhance contrast sensitivity , 1977, Vision Research.
[90] L Stark,et al. Eye Movements during the Viewing of Necker Cubes , 1978, Perception.
[91] John R. Price. Effect of extended observation on reversible perspective duration , 1969 .
[92] Mooney Cm,et al. A new closure test. , 1951 .
[93] Jaakko Hintikka,et al. On the Logic of Perception , 1969 .
[94] Dov Sagi,et al. Motion-induced blindness in normal observers , 2001, Nature.
[95] J. Hochberg,et al. Piecemeal organization and cognitive components in object perception: perceptually coupled responses to moving objects. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[96] K. D. De Valois,et al. Spatial frequency adaptation can enhance contrast sensitivity. , 1977, Vision research.
[97] L. Standing,et al. Satiation Effects with Reversible Figures , 1981, Perceptual and motor skills.
[98] Timothy J. Andrews,et al. Activity in the Fusiform Gyrus Predicts Conscious Perception of Rubin's Vase–Face Illusion , 2002, NeuroImage.
[99] Anna Vicholkovska. Illusions of reversible perspective. , 1906 .
[100] V. Ramachandran,et al. Perceptual Organization in Multistable Apparent Motion , 1985, Perception.
[101] D. Regan. Visual information channeling in normal and disordered vision. , 1982, Psychological review.
[102] B. R. Bugelski,et al. The role of frequency in developing perceptual sets. , 1961, Canadian journal of psychology.
[103] H G Cornwell,et al. Necker Cube Reversal: Sensory or Psychological Satiation? , 1976, Perceptual and motor skills.
[104] C. H. Griffitts,et al. The Influence of Complexity on the Fluctuations of the Illusions of Reversible Perspective , 1931 .
[105] A. G. Bills. Blocking: a new principle of mental fatigue. , 1931 .
[106] P. E. Thetford,et al. Influence of Massing and Spacing on Necker Cube Reversals , 1963, Perceptual and motor skills.
[107] K. T. Brown,et al. Rate of apparent change in a dynamic ambiguous figure as a function of observation-time. , 1955, The American journal of psychology.
[108] Absence of accommodation during perceptual reversal of necker cubes , 1979, Vision Research.
[109] H. Helmholtz. Helmholtz's Treatise on Physiological Optics , 1963 .
[110] V Virsu,et al. Relationships between Channels for Colour and Spatial Frequency in Human Vision , 1973, Perception.
[111] N. Logothetis,et al. Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception , 1999, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[112] R. Leeper. A Study of a Neglected Portion of the Field of Learning—the Development of Sensory Organization , 1935 .
[113] D. Strüber,et al. Differences in Top—Down Influences on the Reversal Rate of Different Categories of Reversible Figures , 1999, Perception.
[114] A. Ames. Visual perception and the rotating trapezoidal window , 1951 .
[115] H. Wallach,et al. Figural aftereffects; an investigation of visual processes. , 1944 .
[116] J G Dugger,et al. Effect of Angle of Retinal Vision on the Rate of Fluctuation of the Necker Cube , 1968, Perceptual and motor skills.
[117] J. C. Flügel,et al. THE INFLUENCE OF ATTENTION IN ILLUSIONS OF REVERSIBLE PERSPECTIVE , 1913 .
[118] M Nawrot,et al. Neural integration of information specifying structure from stereopsis and motion. , 1989, Science.
[119] D. C. Beardslee,et al. Readings in perception , 1958 .
[120] Stephen Wallace,et al. Figure and Ground , 1982 .
[121] D. Ellson. Successive Extinctions of a Bar-Pressing Response in Rats , 1940 .
[122] Krista L. Horlitz,et al. Satiation or availability? Effects of attention, memory, and imagery on the perception of ambiguous figures , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.
[123] R. Liebert,et al. Voluntary Control of Reversible Figures , 1985, Perceptual and motor skills.
[124] S. Palmer,et al. Configural effects in perceived pointing of ambiguous triangles. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[125] Thomas C. Toppino,et al. Prime time: Fatigue and set effects in the perception of reversible figures , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.
[126] R. B. Mefferd,et al. Fluctuations of Perceptual Organization and Orientation: Stochastic (Random) or Steady State (Satiation)? , 1970, Perceptual and motor skills.
[127] Test of Two Theories of the Necker Cube Reversal , 1979, Perceptual and motor skills.
[128] G. H. Fisher,et al. Preparation of ambiguous stimulus materials , 1967 .
[129] William Epstein,et al. Perceptual set as an artifact of recency. , 1960 .
[130] J. Bruner,et al. Perceptual Identification and Perceptual Organization , 1955 .
[131] R. Ammons,et al. Experiential factors in visual form perception. I. Review and formulation of problems. , 1954, The Journal of genetic psychology.
[132] Thomas C. Toppino,et al. Multiple Representations of the Same Reversible Figure: Implications for Cognitive Decisional Interpretations , 1981, Perception.
[133] R. B. Mefferd,et al. Effects of pretraining and instructions on validity of perceptual reports by inexperienced observers. , 1968, Perceptual and motor skills.
[134] R. Groner. Eye Movements and Psychological Functions: International Views , 1983 .
[135] Ian P. Howard,et al. An Investigation of a Satiation Process in the Reversible Perspective of Revolving Skeletal Shapes , 1961 .
[136] J. Lederberg,et al. Size Adaptation : A New Aftereffect , 1969 .
[137] Takayuki Mori,et al. Disambiguating ambiguous figures by a model of selective attention , 1992, Biological Cybernetics.
[138] Martin S. Lindauer. Expectation and satiation accounts of ambiguous figure-ground perception , 1989 .
[139] Jack Botwinick,et al. Husband and Father-in-Law: A Reversible Figure , 1961 .
[140] E. Botha. Practice without Reward and Figure-Ground Perceptions of Adults and Children , 1963, Perceptual and motor skills.
[141] J. F. Dashiell,et al. Theories of perception and the concept of structure. , 1955 .
[142] E. Boring. Sensation and Perception. (Scientific Books: Sensation and Perception in the History of Experimental Psychology) , 1943 .
[143] J. Orbach,et al. Reversibility of the Necker Cube: I. An Examination of the Concept of “Satiation of Orientation” , 1963, Perceptual and motor skills.
[144] C. W. Parkin,et al. The Magnetism of the Moon , 1971 .
[145] Michael Bach,et al. Early neural activity in Necker-cube reversal: evidence for low-level processing of a gestalt phenomenon. , 2004, Psychophysiology.
[146] M. Washburn,et al. The Comparative Controllability of the Fluctuations of Simple and Complex Ambiguous Perspective Figures , 1934 .
[147] Frans A. J. Verstraten,et al. The motion aftereffect , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[148] Robert Malsch,et al. A Three-Dimensional Motion Aftereffect Produced by Prolonged Adaptation to a Rotation Simulation , 1984, Perception.
[149] R. Pritchard. Visual Illusions Viewed as Stabilized Retinal Images , 1958 .
[150] L. Cohen,et al. Rate of Apparent Change of a Necker Cube as a Function of Prior Stimulation , 1959 .
[151] Miguel A. García-Pérez,et al. Visual inhomogeneity and eye movements in multistable perception , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.
[152] K. D. De Valois,et al. Figural aftereffects and spatial attention. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[153] M. Posner,et al. Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[154] A. Chaudhuri. Modulation of the motion aftereffect by selective attention , 1990, Nature.
[155] Eure Sp,et al. Reversible figures and eye-movements. , 1956 .
[156] M. Peterson,et al. Shape recognition contributions to figure-ground reversal: which route counts? , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[157] W. H. Ittelson,et al. Experiments in Perception , 1951 .
[158] R. Penrose,et al. Impossible objects: a special type of visual illusion. , 1958, British journal of psychology.
[159] Thomas C. Toppino,et al. Selective adaptation with reversible figures: Don’t change that channel , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.
[160] Edward C. Carterette,et al. Historical and philosophical roots of perception , 1974 .
[161] The effect of size on the perception of ambiguous figures , 1991 .