The concept of contingency beyond "It depends": illustrations from IS research stream

With the advent of the widely heralded "new economy", organizations are undergoing profound changes. Interestingly, information systems/information technology (IS/IT) has emerged as the vehicle for launching new organizational forms so that market forces can be effectively managed to yield favorable business solutions. A critical issue for managers to tackle in this environment is the core idea of fit among organizational domains in order to optimize performance. The role of academics in this endeavor is to clarify the notion of fit conceptually as well as methodologically.This paper synthesizes alternative concepts of fit starting from congruence and contingency, and attempts to clarify the enduring concept of contingency beyond the common sense notion of "It depends". Then it demonstrates the enriching value of the principles advocated in this paper by incorporating these principles in a selected set of prior empirical work in IS. Finally, a methodological enhancement to contingency analysis is proposed--an alternate solution to the systems approach to fit.

[1]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Information Processing as an Integrating Concept in Organizational Design. , 1978 .

[2]  J. Werbel,et al.  Universalistic and Contingency Predictions of Employee Satisfaction and Conflict. , 1979 .

[3]  Daniel Robey,et al.  User Involvement in Information System Development: A Conflict Model and Empirical Test , 1982 .

[4]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[5]  C. R. Franz,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL CONTEXT, USER INVOLVEMENT, AND THE USEFULNESS OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS* , 1986 .

[6]  K. E. Southwood Substantive Theory and Statistical Interaction: Five Models , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[7]  K. K. Kim,et al.  Task‐Structure Relationship of Information Systems Development Subunit: A Congruence Perspective* , 1992 .

[8]  Phillip Ein-Dor,et al.  Organizational Context and MIS Structure: Some Empirical Evidence , 1982, MIS Q..

[9]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory. , 1985 .

[10]  Peter Weill,et al.  An Assessment of the Contingency Theory of Management Information Systems , 1989, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[11]  John B. Cullen,et al.  Alternative Methods for Measuring Organization Fit: Technology, Structure, and Performance , 1992 .

[12]  Sarma R. Nidumolu Interorganizational information systems and the structure and climate of seller-buyer relationships , 1995, Inf. Manag..

[13]  Danny Miller,et al.  TOWARD A NEW CONTINGENCY APPROACH: THE SEARCH FOR ORGANIZATIONAL GESTALTS , 1981 .

[14]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Organizational Context and Information Systems Success: A Contingency Approach , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Kyung Kyu Kim,et al.  Structure and Perceived Effectiveness of Software Development Subunits: A Task Contingency Analysis , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[16]  P. Green,et al.  Analyzing multivariate data , 1978 .

[17]  Sarma R. Nidumolu The Effect of Coordination and Uncertainty on Software Project Performance: Residual Performance Risk as an Intervening Variable , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[18]  C. B. Schoonhoven Problems with contingency theory: testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency "theory.". , 1981, Administrative science quarterly.

[19]  Jay R. Galbraith Organization Design , 1977 .

[20]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  The Concept of Fit in Contingency Theory. , 1984 .

[21]  Iris Vessey,et al.  The Effect of User Involvement on System Success: A Contingency Approach , 1988, MIS Q..

[22]  L. Fry,et al.  Congruence, Contingency, and Theory Building , 1987 .

[23]  R. Dawes,et al.  Linear models in decision making. , 1974 .

[24]  Kyung Kyu Kim,et al.  Task characteristics, decentralization, and the success of hospital information systems , 1990, Inf. Manag..