Wind speed inference from environmental flow–structure interactions

Graphical Abstract This study aims to leverage the relationship between fluid dynamic loading and resulting structural deformation to infer the incident flow speed from measurements of time-dependent structure kinematics. Wind tunnel studies are performed on cantilevered cylinders and trees. Tip deflections of the wind-loaded structures are captured in time series data, and a physical model of the relationship between force and deflection is applied to calculate the instantaneous wind speed normalized with respect to a known reference wind speed. Wind speeds inferred from visual measurements showed consistent agreement with ground truth anemometer measurements for different cylinder and tree configurations. These results suggest an approach for non-intrusive, quantitative flow velocimetry that eliminates the need to directly visualize or instrument the flow itself.

[1]  Beaufort scale of wind force as adapted for use on forested areas of the northern Rocky Mountains , 1934 .

[2]  K. E. Bisshopp,et al.  Large deflection of cantilever beams , 1945 .

[3]  F. Virginia Rohde Large deflections of a cantilever beam with uniformly distributed load , 1953 .

[4]  A. Gent,et al.  On the Relation between Indentation Hardness and Young's Modulus , 1958 .

[5]  D. Tritton Experiments on the flow past a circular cylinder at low Reynolds numbers , 1959, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[6]  A. Roshko Experiments on the flow past a circular cylinder at very high Reynolds number , 1961, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[7]  G. Batchelor,et al.  An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics , 1968 .

[8]  Large deflections of tapered cantilever beams , 1968 .

[9]  G. J. Mayhead,et al.  Some drag coefficients for British forest trees derived from wind tunnel studies , 1973 .

[10]  R. King,et al.  VORTEX EXCITED STRUCTURAL OSCILLATIONS OF A CIRCULAR CYLINDER IN STEADY CURRENTS , 1974 .

[11]  W. R. Hargraves,et al.  Nationwide assessment of potential output from wind-powered generators , 1976 .

[12]  E. W. Hewson,et al.  Trees as a Local Climatic Wind Indicator , 1979 .

[13]  H. R. Holbo,et al.  Aeromechanical behavior of selected Douglas-fir , 1980 .

[14]  M. Cannell,et al.  Structural analysis of tree trunks and branches: tapered cantilever beams subject to large deflections under complex loading. , 1987, Tree physiology.

[15]  R. Stull An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology , 1988 .

[16]  S. Vogel Drag and Reconfiguration of Broad Leaves in High Winds , 1989 .

[17]  Josef Kittler,et al.  A Comparative Study of Hough Transform Methods for Circle Finding , 1989, Alvey Vision Conference.

[18]  L. G. Jaeger,et al.  Dynamics of structures , 1990 .

[19]  J. Kittler,et al.  Comparative study of Hough Transform methods for circle finding , 1990, Image Vis. Comput..

[20]  Heli Peltola,et al.  Swaying of trees as caused by wind: analysis of field measurements. , 1993 .

[21]  Andrew Dawson,et al.  Experimental observations of the aerodynamic characteristics of urban trees , 1994 .

[22]  Barry Gardiner,et al.  Wind and wind forces in a plantation spruce forest , 1994 .

[23]  B. Gardiner,et al.  Field and wind tunnel assessments of the implications of respacing and thinning for tree stability , 1997 .

[24]  Barry Gardiner,et al.  A mathematical model to describe the dynamic response of a spruce tree to the wind , 1998, Trees.

[25]  T. W. Lambert,et al.  Modern estimation of the parameters of the Weibull wind speed distribution for wind energy analysis , 2000 .

[26]  Thomas Speck,et al.  Reconfiguration as a Prerequisite for Survival in Highly Unstable Flow-Dominated Habitats , 2004, Journal of Plant Growth Regulation.

[27]  Stephen J. Mitchell,et al.  Wind tunnel measurements of crown streamlining and drag relationships for three conifer species , 2004 .

[28]  Joachim Peinke,et al.  Laser-cantilever anemometer: A new high-resolution sensor for air and liquid flows , 2005 .

[29]  Kenneth E. Byrne,et al.  Wind tunnel measurements of crown streamlining and drag relationships for several hardwood species , 2005 .

[30]  H. Mayer,et al.  Wind-induced tree sways , 1987, Trees.

[31]  Brian Kane,et al.  Drag coefficients and crown area estimation of red maple , 2006 .

[32]  John R Moore,et al.  Simulating the dynamic behavior of Douglas-fir trees under applied loads by the finite element method. , 2008, Tree physiology.

[33]  E. D. Langre Effects of Wind on Plants , 2008 .

[34]  Horst Bleckmann,et al.  Lateral line system of fish. , 2009, Integrative zoology.

[35]  Kei Sawata,et al.  Evaluation of drag coefficients of poplar-tree crowns by a field test method , 2010, Journal of Wood Science.

[36]  Charles A. Doswell,et al.  On the implementation of the enhanced Fujita scale in the USA , 2009 .

[37]  Hanns-Christof Spatz,et al.  Worldwide correlations of mechanical properties and green wood density. , 2010, American journal of botany.

[38]  Emmanuel de Langre,et al.  On the scaling of drag reduction by reconfiguration in plants , 2012 .

[39]  Joel S. Weitzman,et al.  Improved parameterization of seagrass blade dynamics and wave attenuation based on numerical and laboratory experiments , 2014 .

[40]  Tan Shi-zhe,et al.  Underwater artificial lateral line flow sensors , 2014 .

[41]  A. Marquier,et al.  Foliage motion under wind, from leaf flutter to branch buffeting , 2018, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[42]  J. Carmeliet,et al.  Comparative study of flow field and drag coefficient of model and small natural trees in a wind tunnel , 2018, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening.

[43]  T. Jackson,et al.  Finite element analysis of trees in the wind based on terrestrial laser scanning data , 2019, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology.

[44]  Jennifer L Cardona,et al.  Seeing the Wind: Visual Wind Speed Prediction with a Coupled Convolutional and Recurrent Neural Network , 2019, NeurIPS.

[45]  John O. Dabiri,et al.  Aerodynamically Interacting Vertical-Axis Wind Turbines: Performance Enhancement and Three-Dimensional Flow , 2019, Energies.

[46]  Jennifer L. Cardona,et al.  Wind speed inference from environmental flow–structure interactions. Part 2. Leveraging unsteady kinematics , 2022, Flow.