On the relationship between interdisciplinarity and scientific impact

This article analyzes the effect of interdisciplinarity on the scientific impact of individual articles. Using all the articles published in Web of Science in 2000, we define the degree of interdisciplinarity of a given article as the percentage of its cited references made to journals of other disciplines. We show that although for all disciplines combined there is no clear correlation between the level of interdisciplinarity of articles and their citation rates, there are nonetheless some disciplines in which a higher level of interdisciplinarity is related to a higher citation rates. For other disciplines, citations decline as interdisciplinarity grows. One characteristic is visible in all disciplines: Highly disciplinary and highly interdisciplinary articles have a low scientific impact.This suggests that there might be an optimum of interdisciplinarity beyond which the research is too dispersed to find its niche and under which it is too mainstream to have high impact. Finally, the relationship between interdisciplinarity and scientific impact is highly determined by the citation characteristics of the disciplines involved: Articles citing citation-intensive disciplines are more likely to be cited by those disciplines and, hence, obtain higher citation scores than would articles citing non-citation-intensive disciplines.

[1]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Modeling a century of citation distributions , 2008, J. Informetrics.

[2]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Is multidisciplinary research more highly cited? A macrolevel study , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[3]  Eduard Jan Rinia,et al.  Measurement and evaluation of interdisciplinary research and knowledge transfer , 2007 .

[4]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases , 2006, Scientometrics.

[5]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  The place of serials in referencing practices: Comparing natural sciences and engineering with social sciences and humanities , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[6]  Isabel Gómez,et al.  Interdisciplinarity in science: A tentative typology of disciplines and research areas , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[7]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Measuring knowledge transfer between fields of science , 2002, Scientometrics.

[8]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Impact measures of interdisciplinary research in physics , 2002, Scientometrics.

[9]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Citation delay in interdisciplinary knowledge exchange , 2001, Scientometrics.

[10]  D. T. Tomov,et al.  Comparative indicators of interdisciplinarity in modern science , 1996, Scientometrics.

[11]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications , 1995, Scientometrics.

[12]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[13]  Tibor Braun,et al.  Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact , 1986, Scientometrics.

[14]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Long-term variations in the aging of scientific literature: From exponential growth to steady-state science (1900-2004) , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[15]  R. Norgaard,et al.  Practicing Interdisciplinarity , 2005 .