Is the Supply of Mathematics and Science Teachers Sufficient?

This study seeks to empirically ground the debate over mathematics and science teacher shortages and evaluate the extent to which there is, or is not, sufficient supply of teachers in these fields. The authors’ analyses of nationally representative data from multiple sources show that math and science are the fields most difficult to staff, but the factors behind these problems are complex. There are multiple sources of new teachers; those with education degrees are a minor source compared to those with degrees in math and science and the reserve pool. Over the past two decades, graduation requirements, student course taking, and teacher retirements have all increased for math and science, yet the new supply has more than kept pace. However, when preretirement teacher attrition is factored in, there is a much tighter balance between supply and demand. Unlike fields such as English, for math and science, there is not a large cushion of new supply relative to losses—resulting in staffing problems in schools with higher turnover.

[1]  P. Hom.  Employee Turnover , 1994 .

[2]  Richard M. Ingersoll,et al.  Who's Teaching Our Children?. , 2010 .

[3]  America's Teacher Quality Problem: Alternatives for Reform , 1984 .

[4]  Martine,et al.  A Study of turnover , 2007 .

[5]  Richard M. Ingersoll,et al.  Teacher Turnover and Teacher Shortages: An Organizational Analysis , 2001 .

[6]  C. Kelley,et al.  CONSORTIUM FOR POLICY RESEARCH IN EDUCATION , 2012 .

[7]  Noga Alon,et al.  Admission control to minimize rejections and online set cover with repetitions , 2005, SPAA '05.

[8]  R. Rumberger.  The impact of salary differentials on teacher shortages and turnover: The case of mathematics and science teachers , 1987 .

[9]  Jeannie Oakes,et al.  Multiplying Inequalities: The Effects of Race, Social Class, and Tracking on Opportunities to Learn Mathematics and Science , 1990 .

[10]  Jay B. Labov,et al.  Learning and Understanding: Improving Advanced Study of Mathematics and Science in U.S. High Schools, NRC Report , 2002 .

[11]  Megan L. Franke,et al.  Research for High-Quality Urban Teaching , 2002 .

[12]  Katherine E. Masyn,et al.  Careers in Motion: A Longitudinal Retention Study of Role Changing among Early-Career Urban Educators , 2008, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[13]  J. Rosenstein,et al.  When Districts Encounter Teacher Shortages: The Challenges of Recruiting and Retaining Mathematics Teachers in Urban Districts , 2008 .

[14]  P. Murphy,et al.  A National Crisis or Localized Problems? Getting Perspective on the Scope and Scale of the Teacher Shortage , 2003 .

[15]  J. L. Price.  The Impact of Turnover on the Organization , 1989 .

[16]  S. Kirby,et al.  Teacher Turnover and Teacher Quality , 1997, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[17]  Richard M. Ingersoll,et al.  Is There Really a Teacher Shortage , 2003 .

[18]  David C. Treadway.  Before It's Too Late , 1989 .

[19]  R. Stolzenberg,et al.  Bringing the Boss Back In: Employer Size, Employee Schooling, and Socioeconomic Achievement , 1978 .

[20]  B. Annexure.  DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION , 2002 .

[21]  Beryl Lieff Benderly,et al.  Rising Above "The Gathering Storm" , 2007 .

[22]  M. Goodfellow.  The School Teacher , 1983 .

[23]  Scott Naftel,et al.  No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 , 2010 .

[24]  Sheida White,et al.  How Does NAEP Select Schools and Students , 2000 .

[25]  Susanna Loeb,et al.  The Draw of Home: How Teachers&Apos; Preferences for Proximity Disadvantage Urban Schools , 2003 .

[26]  Richard M. Ingersoll,et al.  The Problem of Underqualified Teachers in American Secondary Schools , 1999 .

[27]  R. Ingersoll.  Why Some Schools Have More Underqualified Teachers Than Others , 2004 .

[28]  Henry May,et al.  The Magnitude, Destinations, and Determinants of Mathematics and Science Teacher Turnover , 2010 .

[29]  G. Rodger,et al.  Before it's too late... , 1981, The Canadian nurse.

[30]  Susan Johnson,et al.  New Teachers and the Massachusetts Signing Bonus: The Limits of Inducements , 2004 .

[31]  Neil D. Theobald.  An examination of the influence of personal, professional, and school district characteristics on public school teacher retention , 1990 .

[32]  Rod Paige,et al.  Meeting the Highly Qualified Teachers Challenge: The Secretary's Annual Report on Teacher Quality. , 2002 .

[33]  J. Rice,et al.  Piecing Together the Teacher Policy Landscape: A Policy Problem Typology , 2009, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[34]  R. Fowler.  The Heralded Rise and Neglected Fall of the Massachusetts Signing Bonus , 2008 .

[35]  Rolf K. Blank,et al.  State Indicators of Science and Mathematics Education 2007 , 2007 .

[36]  L. Darling-Hammond.  Beyond the commission reports : the coming crisis in teaching , 1984 .

[37]  Susan P. Choy.  America's Teachers: Profile of a Profession , 1993 .

[38]  Peter J. Denning,et al.  A nation at risk: the imperative for educational reform , 1983, CACM.

[39]  R. Henke,et al.  America's Teachers: Profile of a Profession, 1993-94. , 1997 .

[40]  L. Darling-Hammond,et al.  Doing what matters most : investing in quality teaching , 1997 .