Interim Analysis and Sample Size Reassessment

This article deals with sample size reassessment for adaptive two-stage designs based on conditional power arguments utilizing the variability observed at the first stage. Fisher's product test for the p-values from the disjoint samples at the two stages is considered in detail for the comparison of the means of two normal populations. We show that stopping rules allowing for the early acceptance of the null hypothesis that are optimal with respect to the average sample size may lead to a severe decrease of the overall power if the sample size is a priori underestimated. This problem can be overcome by choosing designs with low probabilities of early acceptance or by midtrial adaptations of the early acceptance boundary using the variability observed in the first stage. This modified procedure is negligibly anticonservative and preserves the power.

[1]  J. Wittes,et al.  The role of internal pilot studies in increasing the efficiency of clinical trials. , 1990, Statistics in medicine.

[2]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[3]  Meinhard Kieser,et al.  On the Use of the Upper Confidence Limit for the Variance from a Pilot Sample for Sample Size Determination , 1996 .

[4]  R. H. Browne.  On the use of a pilot sample for sample size determination. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[5]  J. Cui,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation of a Delay Distribution Based on Left‐Censored and Right‐Truncated Data , 1999, Biometrics.

[6]  J Röhmel,et al.  An adaptive method for establishing a dose-response relationship. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[7]  Sue-Jane Wang,et al.  Modification of Sample Size in Group Sequential Clinical Trials , 1999, Biometrics.

[8]  J. Hemelrijk,et al.  Some remarks on the combination of independent tests , 1953 .

[9]  T. Friede,et al.  Re-calculating the sample size in internal pilot study designs with control of the type I error rate. , 2000, Statistics in medicine.

[10]  C. Stein.  A Two-Sample Test for a Linear Hypothesis Whose Power is Independent of the Variance , 1945 .

[11]  Peter Bauer,et al.  A simulation program for adaptive two stage designs , 1998 .

[12]  S. Lorentsen,et al.  Estimation of offspring production from a limited number of stage-structured censuses. , 1999, Biometrics.

[13]  S. Day,et al.  Internal pilot studies for estimating sample size. , 1994, Statistics in medicine.

[14]  M. Proschan,et al.  Internal pilot studies I: type I error rate of the naive t-test. , 1999, Statistics in medicine.

[15]  W. Lehmacher,et al.  Adaptive Sample Size Calculations in Group Sequential Trials , 1999, Biometrics.

[16]  G Wassmer,et al.  A comparison of two methods for adaptive interim analyses in clinical trials. , 1998, Biometrics.

[17]  T. Morgan,et al.  Optimal restricted two-stage designs. , 1987, Controlled clinical trials.

[18]  P. Bauer,et al.  Evaluation of experiments with adaptive interim analyses. , 1994, Biometrics.

[19]  D. Zucker,et al.  Internal pilot studies II: comparison of various procedures. , 1999, Statistics in medicine.

[20]  P. Bauer,et al.  Adaptive Two Stage Designs and the Conditional Error Function , 1999 .

[21]  M A Proschan,et al.  Designed extension of studies based on conditional power. , 1995, Biometrics.

[22]  T. Therneau,et al.  A two-stage design for randomized trials with binary outcomes. , 1987, Controlled clinical trials.

[23]  K E Muller,et al.  Exact test size and power of a Gaussian error linear model for an internal pilot study. , 1999, Statistics in medicine.

[24]  L Fisher,et al.  Statistical Inference for Self‐Designing Clinical Trials with a One‐Sided Hypothesis , 1999, Biometrics.