Dynamic Response Comparison of Dual-Wound and Single-Wound Machines in Multi-Bus Power System Architectures

Power systems with highly flexible architectures (i.e. permitting many configurations) may allow for more economic operation as well as improved reliability and resiliency. The greater number of configurations enable optimization for attaining the former benefit and redundancy for achieving the latter. Flexibility is of great importance in electric ship power systems wherein the system must ensure delivery of power to vital loads. The United States (US) Navy is currently investigating new architectures that enable a greater number of interconnection permutations. Among the new features considered are generators that may supply two buses; this may be done using conventional (single winding set) generators and two rectifiers or a dual wound machine with two rectifiers. In systems supplied by dual-wound machines, buses may not be tied directly but are linked dynamically through the shared generator dynamics. In systems with conventional generation supplying two rectifiers, the two buses are tied through a common AC bus supplying both rectifiers. This paper presents a comparison of these two approaches of supplying two buses from one generator; the evaluation considers issues associated with dynamic coupling through these two candidate architectures, including the coupled response due to faults and systems with pulsed loads. Results are based on analysis, simulation results, and hardware experiment.