Development of CFD Algorithms for Transient and Steady Aerodynamics

Research carried out in the United States and in Europe over the last 20 years has led to the development of the advanced propeller, a small-diameter, highly-loaded, multi-bladed, swept, variable-pitch propeller, that can achieve potential fuel savings of 30% over an equivalent technology turbofan engine at competitive speed and altitudes. In this work an implicit finite-volume algorithm is developed for predicting the transient flow around an advanced propeller under asymmetric inflow conditions. The development of the unsteady propeller algorithm evolves from a family of methods for progressively more complex applications. In total six algorithms are developed: three steady and three unsteady. Each solves the Euler equations using a cell-centered, central-difference, finite-volume scheme in transformed space. Adaptive artificial dissipation terms are added both for stability and for accuracy. The steady methods employ an explicit, multistage, time-stepping scheme. A fully implicit time discretisation is employed in the time-dependent algorithms to avoid the maximum time step limitation typical of explicit schemes. The implicit equations are iteratively inverted at each physical time step by casting them in a modified steady form and marching to steady-state in a pseudo time. Local time-stepping, implicit residual averaging and multigrid are employed for convergence acceleration. Results from a range of test cases computed by each of the algorithms are presented and compared with wind tunnel data and with the predictions of other researchers. The unsteady propeller algorithm is used to compute the flowfields around advanced propellers at incidence. The results demonstrate that this family of algorithms is useful for in viscid flowfield analyses and that the unsteady propeller algorithm can provide further insight into the aerodynamics of advanced propellers.

[1]  Luigi Martinelli,et al.  Calculations of viscous flows with a multigrid method , 1987 .

[2]  Veer N. Vatsa,et al.  Development of an efficient multigrid code for 3-D Navier-Stokes equations , 1989 .

[3]  Kamakhya Prasad Singh Dynamic Unstructured Method for Prescribed and Aerodynamically Determined Relative Moving Boundary Problems , 1995 .

[4]  C. Rohrbach,et al.  Benefits of blade sweep for advanced turboprops , 1986 .

[5]  Shanhong Ji,et al.  Unsteady flow calculations with a multigrid Navier-Stokes method , 1996 .

[6]  Antony Jameson,et al.  A new multigrid Euler method for fighter-type configurations , 1987 .

[7]  F. Boyle,et al.  Three-dimensional Euler solutions for axisymmetric and non-axisymmetric advanced propeller flows , 1999 .

[8]  Guru P. Guruswamy,et al.  Unsteady transonic Navier-Stokes computations for an oscillating wing using single and multiple zones , 1990 .

[9]  M. Vinokur,et al.  An analysis of finite-difference and finite-volume formulations of conservation laws , 1986 .

[10]  R. L. Sorenson,et al.  Use of hyperbolic partial differential equations to generate body fitted coordinates , 1980 .

[11]  V. N. Vatsa,et al.  Accurate numerical solutions for transonic viscous flow over finite wings , 1987 .

[12]  David L. Whitfield,et al.  Three-dimensional unsteady Euler solutions for propfans and counter-rotating propfans in transonic flow , 1987 .

[13]  K. Helming Numerical Analysis of Sweep Effects in Shrouded Propfan Rotors , 1996 .

[14]  M. Cross,et al.  Numerical grid generation—foundations and applications , 1986 .

[15]  Jürgen Kompenhans,et al.  Investigation of Unsteady Flow Fields on High Speed Propellers by Means of the Particle Image Velocimetry Technique , 1998 .

[16]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Re-engineering the design process through computation , 1997 .

[17]  A. Jameson The Present Status , Challenges , and Future Developments in Computational Fluid Dynamics , 1995 .