Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part III: Behavior and effects of relevance
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Peng Dong,et al. Relevance similarity: an alternative means to monitor information retrieval systems , 2005, Biomedical digital libraries.
[2] Joseph Janes,et al. Relevance Judgments of Actual Users and Secondary Judges: A Comparative Study , 1992, The Library Quarterly.
[3] Soo Young Rieh,et al. Analysis of multiple query reformulations on the web: The interactive information retrieval context , 2006, Information Processing & Management.
[4] John J. Regazzi. Performance measures for information retrieval systems ― an experimental approach , 1988 .
[5] Javed Mostafa,et al. An experiment in building profiles in information filtering: the role of context of user relevance feedback , 2002, Inf. Process. Manag..
[6] Mu-Hsuan Huang,et al. The influence of document presentation order and number of documents judged on users' judgments of relevance , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[7] Ian Ruthven,et al. Integrating approaches to relevance , 2005 .
[8] Amanda Spink,et al. Regions and levels: Measuring and mapping users' relevance judgments , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[9] David Ellis,et al. The Dilemma of Measurement in Information Retrieval Research , 1996, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[10] Nicholas J. Belkin,et al. A case for interaction: a study of interactive information retrieval behavior and effectiveness , 1996, CHI.
[11] David Levy,et al. Digital Libraries and the Problem of Purpose , 2000, D Lib Mag..
[12] Katherine W. McCain,et al. Visualizing a discipline: an author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995 , 1998 .
[13] Ellen M. Voorhees,et al. Evaluation by highly relevant documents , 2001, SIGIR '01.
[14] Yunjie Xu,et al. Relevance judgment: What do information users consider beyond topicality? , 2006 .
[15] Don R. Swanson,et al. Some Unexplained Aspects of the Cranfield Tests of Indexing Performance Factors , 1971, The Library Quarterly.
[16] Harry Bruce. A cognitive view of the situational dynamism of user-centered relevance estimation , 1994 .
[17] Carol A. Bean,et al. Topical Relevance Relationships. II. An Exploratory Study and Preliminary Typology , 1995, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[18] Neil R. Smalheiser,et al. Artificial Intelligence An interactive system for finding complementary literatures : a stimulus to scientific discovery , 1995 .
[19] David Davidson,et al. The effect of individual differences of cognitive style on judgments of document relevance , 1977, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[20] Amanda Spink,et al. New Directions in Cognitive Information Retrieval , 2005 .
[21] Tefko Saracevic,et al. Individual Differences in Organizing, Searching and Retrieving Information. , 1991 .
[22] Myke Gluck,et al. Exploring the Relationship between User Satisfaction and Relevance in Information Systems , 1996, Inf. Process. Manag..
[23] Michael E. Lesk,et al. Relevance assessments and retrieval system evaluation , 1968, Inf. Storage Retr..
[24] Ellen M. Voorhees. Variations in relevance judgments and the measurement of retrieval effectiveness , 2000, Inf. Process. Manag..
[25] Linda Schamber. Relevance and Information Behavior. , 1994 .
[26] Robert Burgin. Variations in Relevance Judgments and the Evaluation of Retrieval Performance , 1992, Inf. Process. Manag..
[27] Fabrizio Sebastiani,et al. Trends in ... a Critical Review: On the Role of Logic in Information Retrieval , 1998, Inf. Process. Manag..
[28] Robert E. Johnson,et al. Does Order of Presentation Affect Users' Judgment of Documents?. , 1990 .
[29] Helen R. Tibbo,et al. The Cystic Fibrosis Database: Content and Research Opportunities. , 1991 .
[30] William Goffman,et al. On relevance as a measure , 1964, Inf. Storage Retr..
[31] Carol L. Barry,et al. Users' Criteria for Relevance Evaluation: A Cross-situational Comparison , 1998, Inf. Process. Manag..
[32] Preben Hansen,et al. Effects of foreign language and task scenario on relevance assessment , 2005, J. Documentation.
[33] Carol Collier Kuhlthau,et al. Seeking Meaning: a process approach to library and information services" Ablex Publishing , 2003 .
[34] Gerhard Lakemeyer,et al. Relevance from an Epistemic Perspective , 1997, Artif. Intell..
[35] Amanda Spink,et al. From Highly Relevant to Not Relevant: Examining Different Regions of Relevance , 1998, Inf. Process. Manag..
[36] Nicholas J. Belkin,et al. The TREC Interactive Tracks: Putting the User into Search , 2005 .
[37] Raya Fidel,et al. Users' perception of the performance of a filtering system , 1997, SIGIR '97.
[38] Amanda Spink,et al. Human-computer interaction in information retrieval: nature and manifestations of feedback , 1998, Interact. Comput..
[39] Nuel D. Belnap,et al. Entailment : the logic of relevance and necessity , 1975 .
[40] Thomas J. Froehlich,et al. Relevance reconsidered—towards an agenda for the 21st century: introduction to special topic issue on relevance research , 1994 .
[41] Fabian A. Ehikhamenor,et al. Socio-economic factors in the application of information and communication technologies in Nigerian print media , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[42] Paul B. Kantor,et al. Studying the Value of Library and Information Services. Part I: Establishing a Theoretical Framework. , 1997 .
[43] Joseph W. Janes. On the Distribution of Relevance Judgments. , 1993 .
[44] D. Sperber,et al. Relevance: Communication and cognition, 2nd ed. , 1995 .
[45] M E Williams,et al. Data bases on-line in 1979. , 1979, Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science.
[46] William R. Hersh. Relevance and retrieval evaluation: perspectives from medicine , 1994 .
[47] Peter Ingwersen,et al. Cognitive Perspectives of Information Retrieval Interaction: Elements of a Cognitive IR Theory , 1996, J. Documentation.
[48] Myke Gluck. Understanding performance in information systems: blending relevance and competence , 1995 .
[49] Calvin N. Mooers,et al. Zatocoding applied to mechanical organization of knowledge , 1951 .
[50] Michael B. Eisenberg. Measuring relevance judgments , 1988, Inf. Process. Manag..
[51] Dara Lee Howard. Pertinence as reflected in personal constructs , 1994 .
[52] Peter Ingwersen,et al. The Turn - Integration of Information Seeking and Retrieval in Context , 2005, The Kluwer International Series on Information Retrieval.
[53] John M. Budd,et al. Relevance: Language, Semantics, Philosophy , 2004, Libr. Trends.
[54] J. Janes. Other people's judgments: a comparison of users' and others' judgments of document relevance, topicality, and utility , 1994 .
[55] Stephen E. Robertson,et al. On the Evaluation of IR Systems , 1992, Inf. Process. Manag..
[56] Birger Hjørland,et al. Epistemology and the socio-cognitive perspective in information science , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[57] Nicholas J. Belkin,et al. Rutgers Information Retrieval Evaluation Project on IR Performance on Different Precision Levels , 2006 .
[58] T. Park. The Nature of Relevance in Information Retrieval: An Empirical Study , 1993, The Library Quarterly.
[59] Judy Bateman. Changes in Relevance Criteria: A Longitudinal Study. , 1998 .
[60] Yunjie Xu. Relevance judgment in epistemic and hedonic information searches , 2007 .
[61] Michael B. Eisenberg,et al. DICHOTOMOUS RELEVANCE JUDGMENTS AND THE EVALUATION OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS. , 1987 .
[62] Dagobert Soergel. Indexing and retrieval performance: the logical evidence , 1994 .
[63] José Luis Vicedo González,et al. TREC: Experiment and evaluation in information retrieval , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[64] Carol L. Barry. User-defined relevance criteria: an exploratory study , 1994 .
[65] Tefko Saracevic,et al. RELEVANCE: A review of and a framework for the thinking on the notion in information science , 1997, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[66] Amanda Spink,et al. A multitasking framework for cognitive information retrieval , 2005 .
[67] T. Saracevic,et al. Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part II: nature and manifestations of relevance , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[68] James A. Thom,et al. Relevance Judgments for Assessing Recall , 1996, Inf. Process. Manag..
[69] Carol L. Barry,et al. Order Effects: A Study of the Possible Influence of Presentation Order on User Judgments of Document Relevance. , 1988 .
[70] Cyril Cleverdon,et al. The Cranfield tests on index language devices , 1997 .
[71] Diane Kelly,et al. IMPLICIT FEEDBACK: USING BEHAVIOR TO INFER RELEVANCE , 2005 .
[72] A. Schutz,et al. Reflections On The Problem Of Relevance , 1971 .
[73] Pertti Vakkari,et al. The influence of relevance levels on the effectiveness of interactive information retrieval , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[74] Mark Sanderson,et al. Advantages of query biased summaries in information retrieval , 1998, SIGIR '98.
[75] K. A. McKibbon,et al. Online access to MEDLINE in clinical settings. A study of use and usefulness. , 1990, Annals of internal medicine.
[76] Amanda Spink,et al. Median measure: an approach to IR systems evaluation , 2001, Inf. Process. Manag..
[77] Taemin Kim Park. Toward a theory of user-based relevance: a call for a new paradigm of inquiry , 1994 .
[78] Joseph W. Janes,et al. Relevance judgments and the incremental presentation of document representations , 1991, Inf. Process. Manag..
[79] Stephen P. Harter. Variations in relevance assessments and the measurement of retrieval effectiveness , 1996 .
[80] Howard D. White,et al. Combining bibliometrics, information retrieval, and relevance theory, Part 2: Some implications for information science , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[81] Theresa Dirndorfer Anderson,et al. Relevance as process: judgements in the context of scholarly research , 2005, Inf. Res..
[82] S. Hirsh. Children's Relevance Criteria and Information Seeking on Electronic Resources , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[83] Giyeong Kim,et al. Relationship between index term specificity and relevance judgment , 2006, Inf. Process. Manag..
[84] Judea Pearl,et al. Axioms of Causal Relevance , 1997, Artif. Intell..
[85] C. J. van Rijsbergen,et al. A Non-Classical Logic for Information Retrieval , 1997, Comput. J..
[86] Paul Solomon,et al. Toward an Understanding of the Dynamics of Relevance Judgment: An Analysis of One Person's Search Behavior , 1998, Inf. Process. Manag..
[87] Amanda Spink,et al. Real life, real users, and real needs: a study and analysis of user queries on the web , 2000, Inf. Process. Manag..
[88] Stephen P. Harter,et al. The Cranfield II Relevance Assessments: A Critical Evaluation , 1971, The Library Quarterly.
[89] Edie M. Rasmussen,et al. Users' relevance criteria in image retrieval in American history , 2002, Inf. Process. Manag..
[90] C. J. van Rijsbergen,et al. Incorporating user search behavior into relevance feedback , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[91] Joemon M. Jose,et al. How users assess Web pages for information seeking , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[92] T. Saracevic. Relevance: A Review of the Literature and a Framework for Thinking on the Notion in Information Science. Part II , 2006 .
[93] Tefko Saracevic,et al. The Stratified Model of Information Retrieval Interaction: Extension and Applications , 1997 .
[94] Justin Zobel,et al. How reliable are the results of large-scale information retrieval experiments? , 1998, SIGIR '98.
[95] Michael B. Eisenberg,et al. A re-examination of relevance: toward a dynamic, situational definition , 1990, Inf. Process. Manag..
[96] William S. Cooper,et al. A definition of relevance for information retrieval , 1971, Inf. Storage Retr..
[97] Louise T. Su. Evaluation Measures for Interactive Information Retrieval , 1992, Inf. Process. Manag..
[98] Tefko Saracevic,et al. Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part III: Behavior and effects of relevance , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[99] Roger Lindsay,et al. The roots of relevance , 1993 .
[100] George Kingsley Zipf,et al. Human behavior and the principle of least effort , 1949 .
[101] John R. Searle,et al. Intentionality and its place in nature , 1984, Synthese.
[102] Mounia Lalmas,et al. Logical Models in Information Retrieval: Introduction and Overview , 1998, Inf. Process. Manag..
[103] A. Schutz. The Structures of the Life World , 1973 .
[104] Linda Schamber,et al. Relevance Criteria Uses and Importance: Progress in Development of a Measurement Scale. , 1999 .
[105] Pia Borlund,et al. The concept of relevance in IR , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[106] Jian-Yun Nie,et al. Information Retrieval as Counterfactual , 1995, Comput. J..
[107] Peter Ingwersen,et al. Dimensions of relevance , 2000, Inf. Process. Manag..
[108] Stefano Mizzaro. Relevance: the whole history , 1997 .
[109] Joseph Janes. The Binary Nature of Continuous Relevance Judgments: A Study of Users' Perceptions. , 1991 .
[110] Soo Young Rieh,et al. Interaction on the Web: Scholars' Judgment of Information Quality and Cognitive Authority , 2000 .
[111] Pertti Vakkari,et al. Changes in relevance criteria and problem stages in task performance , 2000, J. Documentation.
[112] Elaine Toms,et al. Searching for Relevance in the Relevance of Search , 2005, CoLIS.
[113] Rebecca Green,et al. Topical Relevance Relationships. I. Why Topic Matching Fails , 1995, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[114] Neil R. Smalheiser,et al. Implicit Text Linkages between Medline Records: Using Arrowsmith as an Aid to Scientific Discovery , 1999, Libr. Trends.
[115] C. D. Gull. Seven years of work on the organization of materials in the special library , 1956 .
[116] D. Sperber,et al. Relevance: Communication and Cognition , 1989 .
[117] K. Popper. Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach , 1972 .
[118] Stefano Mizzaro,et al. How many relevances in information retrieval? , 1998, Interact. Comput..
[119] Carol L. Barry. Document representations and clues to document relevance , 1998 .
[120] Russell Greiner,et al. The Relevance of Relevance (Editorial) , 1997, Artif. Intell..
[121] Don R. Swanson,et al. Subjective versus Objective Relevance in Bibliographic Retrieval Systems , 1986, The Library Quarterly.
[122] Paul B. Kantor,et al. A Study of Information Seeking and Retrieving. III. Searchers, Searches, and Overlap* , 1988 .
[123] Peiling Wang,et al. A Cognitive Model of Document Use During a Research Project. Study II. Decisions at the Reading and Citing Stages , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[124] Steve Smithson,et al. Information Retrieval Evaluation in Practice: A Case Study Approach , 1994, Inf. Process. Manag..
[125] Chad Galloway,et al. Relevance judging, evaluation, and decision making in virtual libraries: A descriptive study , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[126] Howard D. White,et al. Combining bibliometrics, information retrieval, and relevance theory, Part 1: First examples of a synthesis , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[127] Diane Kelly. Measuring online information seeking context, Part 1: Background and method , 2006 .
[128] Peiling Wang,et al. A cognitive model of document use during a research project. Study I. document selection , 1998 .
[129] Peiling Wang,et al. Document Use during a Research Project: A Longitudinal Study. , 1995 .
[130] Pertti Vakkari,et al. Changes in Search Tactics and Relevance Judgements when Preparing a Research Proposal A Summary of the Findings of a Longitudinal Study , 2001, Information Retrieval.
[131] Diane H. Sonnenwald,et al. User perspectives on relevance criteria: A comparison among relevant, partially relevant, and not-relevant judgments , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[132] Howard Greisdorf,et al. Relevance thresholds: a multi-stage predictive model of how users evaluate information , 2003, Inf. Process. Manag..
[133] Pam J. Mayhew,et al. An Alternative Prototyping Classification , 1987, Comput. J..
[134] Allen Kent,et al. Machine literature searching VIII. Operational criteria for designing information retrieval systems , 1955 .
[135] Rong Tang,et al. Use of relevance criteria across stages of document evaluation: on the complementarity of experimental and naturalistic studies , 2001 .
[136] S. P. Harter. Psychological relevance and information science , 1992 .