Time Course of Perceptual Adaptation Differs among Odorants

Perceptual adaptation, a fundamental property of all sensory systems, functions to attenuate neural and perceptual responses to sustained or redundant stimulation as a means of limiting neural saturation and of enhancing the detection of new transient stimuli. While our understanding of the complex physiological mechanisms underlying adaptation has grown in recent years, how these processes are affected by individual odorant properties remains unclear. Recent data from our laboratory demonstrate that the onset time course of perceptual odor adaptation can be estimated by use of a simultaneous-odorant-stimulus paradigm, where the delay from the onset of a relatively long-duration adapting odorant to the onset of a brief target odorant is varied. Adaptation was observed as an increase in threshold with increasing adapting-to-target-odorant onset delay. Using this technique, we compared the estimated onset time course for four common odorants (vanilla extract, coconut extract, vinegar and propanol). Thresholds were estimated for a brief target odorant presented during a simultaneous adapting odorant in a group of college-aged student volunteers (n = 124; 88 females). Onset of adaptation for the vanilla and coconut mixtures was more rapid than for vinegar and propanol, though the asymptotic levels (approximately 400 ms) of adaptation were similar for coconut extract, vanilla extract and vinegar. In contrast, propanol did not reach asymptotic levels within the 1,000-ms timeframe. Considering propanol is a pure alcohol, relative differences in trigeminal reactivity may partially explain this variance in adaptation contours. Practical Applications A method for capturing rapid changes in response to odor adaptation is described. The automated method can be reliably used to compare both the magnitude and time course for a wide range of stimuli. The technique may be reproduced to evaluate how individual olfactory sensitivity changes in response to prolonged stimulation. Importantly, this procedure can be used to assess shifts in odor perception on rapid timescales – in the 50–100-ms range, rather than seconds or minutes.

[1]  M. Fusetti,et al.  Modern psychophysical tests to assess olfactory function , 2005, Neurological Sciences.

[2]  R. Doty The olfactory vector hypothesis of neurodegenerative disease: Is it viable? , 2008, Annals of neurology.

[3]  Katherine I. Nagel,et al.  Biophysical mechanisms underlying olfactory receptor neuron dynamics , 2010, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  Herbert Stone,et al.  A comparison of olfactory adaptation among seven odorants and their relationship with several physicochemical properties , 1972 .

[5]  P. Dalton Psychophysical and behavioral characteristics of olfactory adaptation. , 2000, Chemical senses.

[6]  T. Hummel,et al.  Mexico City air pollution adversely affects olfactory function and intranasal trigeminal sensitivity. , 2009, Chemical senses.

[7]  S. Rainieri,et al.  Organisms Associated with Acetic Acid Bacteria in Vinegar Production , 2009 .

[8]  H. Lawless A SIMPLE ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS FOR THRESHOLD DATA DETERMINED BY ASCENDING FORCED‐CHOICE METHODS OF LIMITS , 2010 .

[9]  T. Hummel,et al.  Intrinsic chemosensory signal recorded from the human nasal mucosa in patients with smell loss , 2013, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[10]  B. Berglund,et al.  Is Loss in Odor Sensitivity Inevitable to the Aging Individual? A Study of “Successfully Aged” Elderly , 2012, Chemosensory Perception.

[11]  Hervé Plaisance,et al.  ODOR EVALUATION AND DISCRIMINATION OF CAR CABIN AND ITS COMPONENTS: APPLICATION OF THE “FIELD OF ODORS” APPROACH IN A SENSORY DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS , 2012 .

[12]  Hildegarde Heymann,et al.  PERCEPTION OF FRUITY AND VEGETATIVE AROMAS IN RED WINE , 2009 .

[13]  T. Hummel,et al.  Central Processing of Trigeminal Activation in Humans , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[14]  F. Zufall,et al.  Subsystem organization of the mammalian sense of smell. , 2009, Annual review of physiology.

[15]  A novel psychophysical method for estimating the time course of olfactory rapid adaptation in humans. , 2010, Chemical senses.

[16]  J. Monnin,et al.  Trigeminal sensitization and desensitization in the nasal cavity: a study of cross interactions. , 2005, Rhinology.

[17]  Rapid Olfactory Adaptation Induced by Perithreshold Odorant Concentrations in Human Observers , 2012, Chemosensory Perception.

[18]  B. Green Chemesthesis and the chemical senses as components of a "chemofensor complex". , 2012, Chemical senses.

[19]  S. Currlin,et al.  INTERACTION OF GUAIACOL AND METHYL SALICYLATE IN BINARY MIXTURE SIGNIFICANTLY LOWERS PERCEPTUAL THRESHOLD IN HUMAN OBSERVERS , 2012 .

[20]  Holly F. Goyert,et al.  Characteristic component odors emerge from mixtures after selective adaptation , 2007, Brain Research Bulletin.

[21]  Serge Charpak,et al.  Peripheral Adaptation Codes for High Odor Concentration in Glomeruli , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  T. Jacob,et al.  Psychophysical evaluation of responses to pleasant and mal-odour stimulation in human subjects; adaptation, dose response and gender differences. , 2003, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[23]  F. Zufall,et al.  The cellular and molecular basis of odor adaptation. , 2000, Chemical senses.

[24]  T. Gharbi,et al.  Time course of odorant- and trigeminal-induced activation in the human brain: an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study , 2011, Neuroscience.

[25]  W. Cain CONTRIBUTION OF THE TRIGEMINAL NERVE TO PERCEIVED ODOR MAGNITUDE * , 1974 .