The classical Shuttleworth-Wallace two-layer model has a modification version proposed by Norman et al. (1995) and Kustas et al. (1999) to estimate evapotranspiration over row crop surfaces. However, the assumption of this modified model is controvertible, and more theoretical analysis and data validation seem necessary to figure out whether this model is a "layer" model or a "patch" model essentially. A field data validation of this kind was carried out in this paper and it was found that a "patch" method could provide more accurate results. A new method to improve S-W model for row crop was given at the end of this paper. This model uses "layer" method to account for the in-canopy exchanges and modified surface resistances to account for the heterogeneities of row crops. The data from the composite remote sensing experiment in Shunyi, Beijing April 2001 were used to validate this model. Surface fluxes were measured by Bowen ratio system while surface radiometric temperature; component temperatures and other parameters were also measured at different atmospheric boundary layer conditions. Results show that estimation of sensible and latent beat fluxes by the new model agree well with the observed fluxes.
[1]
J. Norman,et al.
Evaluation of soil and vegetation heat flux predictions using a simple two-source model with radiometric temperatures for partial canopy cover
,
1999
.
[2]
A. Chehbouni,et al.
Comments on dual-source vegetation–atmosphere transfer models
,
1999
.
[3]
William P. Kustas,et al.
Reply to comments about the basic equations of dual-source vegetation–atmosphere transfer models
,
1999
.
[4]
E. M. Blyth,et al.
Application of aggregation models to surface heat flux from the Sahelian tiger bush
,
1995
.
[5]
J. Norman,et al.
Source approach for estimating soil and vegetation energy fluxes in observations of directional radiometric surface temperature
,
1995
.