Parameter uncertainties in the modelling of vegetation dynamics — effects on tree community structure and ecosystem functioning in European forest biomes

Dynamic vegetation models are useful tools for analysing terrestrial ecosystem processes and their interactions with climate through variations in carbon and water exchange. Long-term changes in structure and composition (vegetation dynamics) caused by altered competitive strength between plant functional types (PFTs) are attracting increasing attention as controls on ecosystem functioning and potential feedbacks to climate. Imperfect process knowledge and limited observational data restrict the possibility to parameterise these processes adequately and potentially contribute to uncertainty in model results. This study addresses uncertainty among parameters scaling vegetation dynamic processes in a process-based ecosystem model, LPJ-GUESS, designed for regional-scale studies, with the objective to assess the extent to which this uncertainty propagates to additional uncertainty in the tree community structure (in terms of the tree functional types present and their relative abundance) and thus to ecosystem functioning (carbon storage and fluxes). The results clearly indicate that the uncertainties in parameterisation can lead to a shift in competitive balance, most strikingly among deciduous tree PFTs, with dominance of either shade-tolerant or shade-intolerant PFTs being possible, depending on the choice of plausible parameter values. Despite this uncertainty, our results indicate that the resulting effect on ecosystem functioning is low. Since the vegetation dynamics in LPJ-GUESS are representative for the more complex Earth system models now being applied within ecosystem and climate research, we assume that our findings will be of general relevance. We suggest that, in terms of carbon storage and fluxes, the heavier parameterisation requirement of the processes involved does not widen the overall uncertainty in model predictions.

[1]  Ari Nissinen,et al.  Evaluation of six process‐based forest growth models using eddy‐covariance measurements of CO2 and H2O fluxes at six forest sites in Europe , 2002 .

[2]  R. Betts,et al.  Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model , 2000, Nature.

[3]  W. Lucht,et al.  Terrestrial vegetation and water balance-hydrological evaluation of a dynamic global vegetation model , 2004 .

[4]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  Modelling Regional Climate Change Effects On Potential Natural Ecosystems in Sweden , 2006 .

[5]  J. Caspersen,et al.  Interspecific variation in sapling mortality in relation to growth and soil moisture , 2001 .

[6]  Hisashi Sato,et al.  SEIB–DGVM: A new Dynamic Global Vegetation Model using a spatially explicit individual-based approach , 2007 .

[7]  O. Zackrisson,et al.  Influence of forest fires on the North Swedish boreal forest , 1977 .

[8]  Christopher B. Field,et al.  Tree Mortality in Gap Models: Application to Climate Change , 2001 .

[9]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Parameterization and Sensitivity Analysis of the BIOME–BGC Terrestrial Ecosystem Model: Net Primary Production Controls , 2000 .

[10]  I. Colin Prentice,et al.  Silvics of north European trees: compilation, comparisons and implications for forest succession modelling. , 1991 .

[11]  C. Field,et al.  Fire history and the global carbon budget: a 1°× 1° fire history reconstruction for the 20th century , 2005 .

[12]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  Changes in European ecosystem productivity and carbon balance driven by regional climate model output , 2007 .

[13]  P. Jones,et al.  Representing Twentieth-Century Space–Time Climate Variability. Part I: Development of a 1961–90 Mean Monthly Terrestrial Climatology , 1999 .

[14]  K. Klumpp,et al.  Growth and maintenance respiration for individual plants in hierarchically structured canopies of Medicago sativa and Helianthus annuus: the contribution of current and old assimilates. , 2004, The New phytologist.

[15]  Stephen P. Ellner,et al.  Coexistence of plant species with similar niches , 1984, Vegetatio.

[16]  Riccardo Valentini,et al.  Fluxes of Carbon, Water and Energy of European Forests , 2003, Ecological Studies.

[17]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  Carbon balance of the terrestrial biosphere in the Twentieth Century: Analyses of CO2, climate and land use effects with four process‐based ecosystem models , 2001 .

[18]  F. Conen,et al.  Potential for detecting changes in soil organic carbon concentrations resulting from climate change , 2003 .

[19]  F. Woodward,et al.  Global response of terrestrial ecosystem structure and function to CO2 and climate change: results from six dynamic global vegetation models , 2001 .

[20]  Stephen Sitch,et al.  The Carbon Balance of the Terrestrial Biosphere: Ecosystem Models and Atmospheric Observations , 2000 .

[21]  Alan R. Ek,et al.  Process-based models for forest ecosystem management: current state of the art and challenges for practical implementation. , 2000, Tree physiology.

[22]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model , 2003 .

[23]  T. M. Bezemer,et al.  Herbivory in global climate change research: direct effects of rising temperature on insect herbivores , 2002 .

[24]  G. Boer,et al.  Simulating Competition and Coexistence between Plant Functional Types in a Dynamic Vegetation Model , 2006 .

[25]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  Effects of Climate Change on Plant Respiration. , 1991, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[26]  A. Pitman,et al.  The uncertainty in simulations by a Global Biome Model (BIOME3) to alternative parameter values , 2000 .

[27]  Ann Henderson-Sellers,et al.  Forty years of numerical climate modelling , 2001 .

[28]  Michael J. Rogers,et al.  Long-term sensitivity of soil carbon turnover to warming , 2005, Nature.

[29]  Pierre Friedlingstein,et al.  Comparing and evaluating process‐based ecosystem model predictions of carbon and water fluxes in major European forest biomes , 2005, Global change biology.

[30]  P. Harcombe,et al.  Tree Life Tables , 1987 .

[31]  J. R. Wallis,et al.  Some ecological consequences of a computer model of forest growth , 1972 .

[32]  Wolfgang Knorr,et al.  Uncertainties in global terrestrial biosphere modeling: 1. A comprehensive sensitivity analysis with a new photosynthesis and energy balance scheme , 2001 .

[33]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  Using a generalized vegetation model to simulate vegetation dynamics in northeastern USA , 2004 .

[34]  C. Loehle.  Strategy Space and the Disturbance Spectrum: A Life‐History Model for Tree Species Coexistence , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[35]  J. R. Kramer,et al.  Evaluating modelling uncertainty for model selection , 2001 .

[36]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  Representation of vegetation dynamics in the modelling of terrestrial ecosystems: comparing two contrasting approaches within European climate space , 2008 .

[37]  Wolfgang Cramer,et al.  INCORPORATING DYNAMIC VEGETATION COVER WITHIN GLOBAL CLIMATE MODELS , 2000 .

[38]  S. Pacala,et al.  Forest models defined by field measurements: I. The design of a northeastern forest simulator , 1993 .

[39]  Mark R. Fulton,et al.  Adult recruitment as a function of juvenile growth rate in size- structured plant populations , 1991 .

[40]  P. Reich,et al.  Low-light carbon balance and shade tolerance in the seedlings of woody plants: Do winter deciduous and broad-leaved evergreen species differ? , 1999 .

[41]  H. Bugmann.  A Review of Forest Gap Models , 2001 .

[42]  Stephen Sitch,et al.  Effects of parameter uncertainties on the modeling of terrestrial biosphere dynamics , 2005 .

[43]  W. Cramer,et al.  The possible dynamic response of northern forests to global warming , 1991 .

[44]  Wolfgang Cramer,et al.  An introduction to the European Terrestrial Ecosystem Modelling Activity , 2008 .

[45]  R. Iman,et al.  A distribution-free approach to inducing rank correlation among input variables , 1982 .