Citation characteristics of English-language monographs in philosophy

This study examines 539 references from 183 single-authored philosophy monographs, excluding collections of essays, published in 1994 and indexed by Philosophers' Index, with each reference counted as frequently as it was cited in the randomly selected citations. The citations were classified as to source type (book, article in book, journal article, manuscript, thesis), language, the gender of both citing and cited authors, the citing authors' attitudes toward the cited material, the subject correlation between citing and cited sources, and the chronology of the citations. The type of presses publishing philosophy monographs and which journals are cited are also discussed. While many contemporary philosophers consider their discipline more related to the sciences than to the humanities, their citation patterns are typically humanistic, with the bulk of citations to books rather than journal articles and the citation of much material older than 20 years. The topics studied were found to be predominantly 20th-century with an emphasis on analytic philosophy and little concern for recent trends in continental philosophy, except for feminist philosophy. A quarter of citations were to disciplines outside philosophy.

[1]  John Cullars,et al.  Characteristics of the Monographic Literature of British and American Literary Studies , 1985 .

[2]  Carnot E. Nelson,et al.  Communication among scientists and engineers , 1970 .

[3]  Michael H. MacRoberts,et al.  Author motivation for not citing influences: A methodological note , 1988 .

[4]  Leonard M. Fleck,et al.  Research Guide in Philosophy , 1977 .

[5]  A. Kernan.  What's Happened to the Humanities? , 1999 .

[6]  M. E. Waithe.  On Not Teaching the History of Philosophy , 1989, Hypatia.

[7]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  Do citations matter? , 1994, J. Inf. Sci..

[8]  Ed C. M. Noyons,et al.  International Comparison of Departments' Research Performance in the Humanities , 1992, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[9]  Rebecca Watson-Boone.  The Information Needs and Habits of Humanities Scholars. , 1994 .

[10]  Bluma C. Peritz.  On the Objectives of Citation Analysis: Problems of Theory and Method , 1992 .

[11]  Roger Scruton,et al.  A Short History of Modern Philosophy: From Descartes to Wittgenstein , 1993 .

[12]  Madeleine Stern.  Characteristics of the Literature of Literary Scholarship. , 1983 .

[13]  David Easton,et al.  Divided Knowledge: Across Disciplines, Across Cultures , 1991 .

[14]  L. McAlister.  Hypatia's daughters : fifteen hundred years of women philosophers , 1996 .

[15]  Blaise Cronin.  Tiered citation and measures of document similarity , 1994 .

[16]  T. Brooks.  Evidence of complex citer motivations , 1986, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[17]  Richard Heinzkill,et al.  Characteristics of References in Selected Scholarly English Literary Journals , 1980, The Library Quarterly.

[18]  Stephen E. Wiberley,et al.  Humanists Revisited: A Longitudinal Look at the Adoption of Information Technology , 1994 .

[19]  Robert N. Broadus.  Use of periodicals by humanities scholars , 1989 .

[20]  John M. Budd,et al.  Characteristics of Written Scholarship in American Literature: A Citation Study. , 1986 .

[21]  Isadore Gilbert Mudge,et al.  Guide to reference books , 1929 .

[22]  Jean-Pierre V. M. Hérubel,et al.  Comparing Materials Used in Philosophy and Political Science Dissertations , 1993 .

[23]  Stephen P. Harter,et al.  Semantic relationships between cited and citing articles in library and information science journals , 1993 .

[24]  L. McAlister.  Some Remarks on Exploring the History of Women in Philosophy , 1989, Hypatia.

[25]  John Cullars,et al.  Citation Characteristics of French and German Literary Monographs , 1989, The Library Quarterly.

[26]  John Cullars,et al.  Citation Characteristics of Monographs in the Fine Arts , 1992, The Library Quarterly.