ABSTRACT The work of Piaget showed that children learn to explain in a developmental way, but their tasks in school science put a twofold strain on their powers. Both the content which they are being asked to explain, and the methods of explanation, are novel. Many examples of apparently immature types of explanation are illustrated. In this article precausal explanations—reafftrmation, teleology, tautology, and simple juxtoposition—are exemplified in the words of secondary school children studying science. Explanation by the use of extended metaphor‐as‐theory may be peculiarly scientific. This is shown to lie beyond the merely causal and is related to the use of distanced simile which presents difficulties to children in a way that close description by metaphorical adjectives does not. Reference to new empirical studies is used to illustrate these points. There is some discussion of the analyses of the use of metaphor in scientific theory, along with the educational research which demonstrates how hard s...
[1]
Joan Solomon,et al.
Learning about energy: how pupils think in two domains
,
1983
.
[2]
Michael Maher.
Judgment and reasoning.
,
1900
.
[3]
Mary Hesse,et al.
Models and analogies in science
,
1970
.
[4]
The pupils’ view of electricity
,
1985
.
[5]
J. Piaget.
Judgement and Reasoning in the Child
,
1962
.
[6]
C. Osgood,et al.
The Measurement of Meaning
,
1958
.
[7]
M. Black.
Models and metaphors : studies in language and philosophy
,
1962
.
[8]
J. Piaget.
The Language and Thought of the Child
,
1927
.
[9]
Donald A. Norman,et al.
Analogical Processes in Learning
,
1980
.
[10]
R. Harré.
History and Philosophy of Science in the Pedagogical Process
,
1983
.