Timetable-aware opportunistic DTN routing for vehicular communications in battlefield environments

Abstract Delay tolerant network (namely DTN) is regarded as a promising technology for communications in challenging environments for its resilience and adaptability. However, efficient and reliable routing algorithm design is still one of many difficulties it faces in achieving broad and fruitful applications. Due to reasons like electromagnetic inference, lack of infrastructure and constantly moving, communication among vehicles in battlefield environments is difficult and makes a prospective field for DTN to bring effective improvements. In this paper, a timetable-aware opportunistic DTN routing algorithm combining limited message copies and biased message spray is proposed for this scenario. Firstly, a mobility model named timetable based aggregation and spread (ASMM) is abstracted, which captures both the integrity and individuality in vehicles’ typical moving behavior on military missions. Then, from the time and coordination information contained in the preset timetables, the meeting chances for different node groups can be predicted. This meeting opportunity is used as a utility for message transmission evaluation in our proposed routing algorithm called GenericSpray. GenericSpray is able to make more accurate and motivated message transferring decisions by exploiting contact opportunity prediction in choosing among possible message carriers and deciding appropriate number of copies to spray. To investigate its performance, both ASMM and GenericSpray are implemented on The ONE, a specialized DTN simulation platform. Results of simulation experiments indicate that GenericSpray outperforms all other classical DTN routing algorithms chosen as contrast, in terms of delivery ratio, delivery delay and transmission overhead.

[1]  Jörg Ott,et al.  Simulating Mobility and DTNs with the ONE (Invited Paper) , 2010, J. Commun..

[2]  Juan-Carlos Cano,et al.  DTN Protocols for Vehicular Networks: An Application Oriented Overview , 2015, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[3]  Christian Bonnet,et al.  Mobility models for vehicular ad hoc networks: a survey and taxonomy , 2009, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[4]  Augusto Casaca,et al.  Multicast in Delay Tolerant Networks Using Probabilities and Mobility Information , 2009, Ad Hoc Sens. Wirel. Networks.

[5]  Vinton G. Cerf,et al.  Delay-tolerant networking: an approach to interplanetary Internet , 2003, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[6]  Anders Lindgren,et al.  Probabilistic routing in intermittently connected networks , 2003, MOCO.

[7]  Zhili Sun,et al.  Routing in Delay/Disruption Tolerant Networks: A Taxonomy, Survey and Challenges , 2013, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[8]  Md. Humayun Kabir,et al.  TTL based routing in opportunistic networks , 2011, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[9]  Ke Xu,et al.  A Survey of Social-Aware Routing Protocols in Delay Tolerant Networks: Applications, Taxonomy and Design-Related Issues , 2014, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[10]  Amin Vahdat,et al.  Epidemic Routing for Partially-Connected Ad Hoc Networks , 2009 .

[11]  Joan Triay,et al.  From Delay-Tolerant Networks to Vehicular Delay-Tolerant Networks , 2012, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[12]  Stephen Farrell,et al.  DTN: an architectural retrospective , 2008, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[13]  Joaquim Celestino,et al.  A systematic technical survey of DTN and VDTN routing protocols , 2016, Comput. Stand. Interfaces.