Evaluation of Commercially Available Remote Sensors for Highway Bridge Condition Assessment

Improving transportation infrastructure inspection methods and the ability to assess conditions of bridges has become a priority in recent years as the transportation infrastructure continues to age. Current bridge inspection techniques consist largely of labor-intensive subjective measures for quantifying deterioration of various bridge elements. Some advanced nondestructive testing techniques, such as ground- penetrating radar, are being implemented; however, little attention has been given to remote sensing technologies. Remote sensing technologies can be used to assess and monitor the condition of bridge infrastructure and improve the efficiency of inspection, repair, and rehabilitation efforts. Most important, monitoring the condition of a bridge using remote sensors can eliminate the need for traffic disruption or total lane closure because remote sensors do not come in direct contact with the structure. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate 12 potential remote sensing technologies for assessing the bridge deck and superstructure condition. Each technology was rated for accuracy, commercial availability, cost of measurement, precollection preparation, complexity of analysis and interpretation, ease of data collection, stand-off distance, and traffic disruption. Results from this study demonstrate the capabilities of each technology and their ability to address bridge challenges.

[1]  K. V. S. Badarinath,et al.  Sub-pixel fire detection using Landsat-TM thermal data , 2002 .

[2]  Joseph E. Krajewski,et al.  Bridge Inspection and Interferometry , 2006 .

[3]  E. Falkner Aerial mapping : methods and applications , 1995 .

[4]  R M Morey,et al.  Ground penetrating radar for evaluating subsurface conditions for transportation facilities , 1998 .

[5]  M Moore,et al.  PHENOMENOLOGY STUDY OF HERMES GROUND-PENETRATING RADAR TECHNOLOGY FOR DETECTION AND IDENTIFICATION OF COMMON BRIDGE DECK FEATURES , 2001 .

[6]  George Hearn,et al.  Bridge Inspection Practices , 2007 .

[7]  Stan Aronoff Remote Sensing for GIS Managers , 2005 .

[8]  Hiroshi Suemasu,et al.  Damage detection of C/C composites using ESPI and SQUID techniques , 2005 .

[9]  Edward M. Mikhail,et al.  Detection and sub-pixel location of photogrammetric targets in digital images☆ , 1984 .

[10]  Peter Cawley,et al.  Feasibility of digital image correlation for detection of cracks at fastener holes , 2009 .

[11]  Erik M. Johansson,et al.  Improved ground-penetrating radar, bridge decks , 1993 .

[12]  Carlo Atzeni,et al.  Interferometric radar vs. accelerometer for dynamic monitoring of large structures: An experimental comparison , 2008 .

[13]  Lawrence L. Sutter,et al.  An Evaluation of Commercially Available Remote Sensors for Assessing Highway Bridge Condition , 2010 .

[14]  Glenn Washer,et al.  Effects of Environmental Variables on Infrared Imaging of Subsurface Features of Concrete Bridges , 2009 .

[15]  Edward T. Harrigan,et al.  NAtioNAl CooperAtive HigHwAy reseArCH progrAm , 2013 .

[16]  Shen-En Chen,et al.  Integrated Remote Sensing and Visualization (IRSV) System for Transportation Infrastructure Operations and Management: Phase One, Volume One, Summary Report , 2009 .