Multidimensional scaling visualization of earthquake phenomena

Earthquakes are associated with negative events, such as large number of casualties, destruction of buildings and infrastructures, or emergence of tsunamis. In this paper, we apply the Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) analysis to earthquake data. MDS is a set of techniques that produce spatial or geometric representations of complex objects, such that, objects perceived to be similar/distinct in some sense are placed nearby/distant on the MDS maps. The interpretation of the charts is based on the resulting clusters since MDS produces a different locus for each similarity measure. In this study, over three million seismic occurrences, covering the period from January 1, 1904 up to March 14, 2012 are analyzed. The events, characterized by their magnitude and spatiotemporal distributions, are divided into groups, either according to the Flinn–Engdahl seismic regions of Earth or using a rectangular grid based in latitude and longitude coordinates. Space-time and Space-frequency correlation indices are proposed to quantify the similarities among events. MDS has the advantage of avoiding sensitivity to the non-uniform spatial distribution of seismic data, resulting from poorly instrumented areas, and is well suited for accessing dynamics of complex systems. MDS maps are proven as an intuitive and useful visual representation of the complex relationships that are present among seismic events, which may not be perceived on traditional geographic maps. Therefore, MDS constitutes a valid alternative to classic visualization tools, for understanding the global behavior of earthquakes.

[1]  Robert J. Geller,et al.  Earthquake prediction: a critical review , 1997 .

[2]  E. R. Engdahl,et al.  Seismic and Geographical Regionalization , 1974, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[3]  Kâmil Uğurbil,et al.  Cerebral cortical mechanisms of copying geometrical shapes: a multidimensional scaling analysis of fMRI patterns of activation , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  M. Stucchi,et al.  Assessing the completeness of Italian historical earthquake data , 2004 .

[5]  David A. Yuen,et al.  Nonlinear multidimensional scaling and visualization of earthquake clusters over space, time and feature space , 2005 .

[6]  J. A. Tenreiro Machado,et al.  Multidimensional Scaling for Orthodontic Root Resorption , 2013 .

[7]  Jorge Henriques,et al.  Iterative Multidimensional Scaling for Industrial Process Monitoring , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.

[8]  Xiang Ji,et al.  Sensor positioning in wireless ad-hoc sensor networks using multidimensional scaling , 2004, IEEE INFOCOM 2004.

[9]  Y. Ogata,et al.  The Centenary of the Omori Formula for a Decay Law of Aftershock Activity , 1995 .

[10]  Douglas A. Wiens,et al.  The Flinn-Engdahl Regionalisation Scheme: The 1995 revision , 1996 .

[11]  Frankie K. W. Chan,et al.  Efficient Weighted Multidimensional Scaling for Wireless Sensor Network Localization , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[12]  Y. Kagan,et al.  Probabilistic forecasting of earthquakes , 2000 .

[13]  J. Tenreiro Machado,et al.  Analysis of financial data series using fractional Fourier transform and multidimensional scaling , 2011 .

[14]  H. R. Wason,et al.  Magnitude conversion to unified moment magnitude using orthogonal regression relation , 2012 .

[15]  P. Groenen,et al.  Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications , 1999 .

[16]  Björn Lund,et al.  Physics of the Omori law : Inferences from interevent time distributions and pore pressure diffusion modeling , 2006 .

[17]  Fernando B. M. Duarte,et al.  Dynamics of the Dow Jones and the NASDAQ stock indexes , 2010 .

[18]  Alexander M. Bronstein,et al.  Multigrid multidimensional scaling , 2006, Numer. Linear Algebra Appl..

[19]  Robin De Keyser,et al.  Is multidimensional scaling suitable for mapping the input respiratory impedance in subjects and patients? , 2011, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[20]  Stefan Wiemer,et al.  A Software Package to Analyze Seismicity: ZMAP , 2001 .

[21]  Joseph L. Zinnes,et al.  Theory and Methods of Scaling. , 1958 .

[22]  J. A. Tenreiro Machado,et al.  Identifying economic periods and crisis with the multidimensional scaling , 2011 .

[23]  James O. Ramsay,et al.  Some small sample results for maximum likelihood estimation in multidimensional scaling , 1980 .

[24]  M. Jafari,et al.  Statistical prediction of the next great earthquake around Tehran, Iran , 2010 .

[25]  B. Gutenberg,et al.  Frequency of Earthquakes in California , 1944, Nature.

[26]  Bodo Ahrens,et al.  Distance in spatial interpolation of daily rain gauge data , 2005 .

[27]  G. Panza,et al.  Integration and magnitude homogenization of the Egyptian earthquake catalogue , 2008 .

[28]  J. Woessner,et al.  Estimating the magnitude of completeness for earthquake catalogs , 2012 .

[29]  P. Reasenberg,et al.  Earthquake Hazard After a Mainshock in California , 1989, Science.

[30]  E. A. Flinn,et al.  A proposed basis for geographical and seismic regionalization , 1965 .

[31]  P. Groenen,et al.  Modern multidimensional scaling , 1996 .

[32]  Y. Kagan Correlations of earthquake focal mechanisms , 1992 .

[33]  J. A. Tenreiro Machado,et al.  Dynamical analysis of compositions , 2011 .

[34]  J. Kruskal Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis , 1964 .