Impact of aortic grafts on arterial pressure: a computational fluid dynamics study.

OBJECTIVE Vascular prostheses currently used in vascular surgery do not have the same mechanical properties as human arteries. This computational study analyses the mechanisms by which grafts, placed in the ascending aorta (proximal) and descending aorta (distal), affect arterial blood pressure. METHODS A one-dimensional cardiovascular model was developed and adapted to include the graft geometry with in vitro measured mechanical properties. Pressure at the aortic root and haemodynamic parameters were computed and compared for a control, proximal and distal graft case. RESULTS In comparison to the control case, the proximal graft increased characteristic impedance by 58% versus only 1% change for the distal graft. The proximal and distal graft increased pulse pressure by 21% and 10%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The mechanisms underlying pulse pressure increase are different for proximal and distal grafts. For the proximal graft, the primary reason for pulse pressure rise is augmentation of the forward wave, resulting from characteristic impedance increase. For the distal graft, the pulse pressure rise is associated with augmented wave reflections resulting from compliance mismatch. Overall, the proximal aortic graft resulted in greater haemodynamic alterations than the distal graft. Thus, it is likely that patients who receive ascending aorta grafts are more prone to systolic hypertension and therefore deserve closer blood pressure monitoring.

[1]  J. Tyberg,et al.  Endografting of the descending thoracic aorta increases ascending aortic input impedance and attenuates pressure transmission in dogs. , 2006, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[2]  M. Prokop,et al.  Dynamics of the aorta before and after endovascular aneurysm repair: a systematic review. , 2009, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[3]  佐川 喜一,et al.  Cardiac contraction and the pressure-volume relationship , 1988 .

[4]  A. Takeda,et al.  Enhanced aortic pressure wave reflection in patients after repair of aortic coarctation. , 2005, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[5]  N. Stergiopulos,et al.  Hemodynamics induced after acute reduction of proximal thoracic aorta compliance. , 2003, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[6]  S. Travis,et al.  Anatomical risk factors for proximal perigraft endoleak and graft migration following endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. , 2000, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[7]  P. Taylor,et al.  Endovascular infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair , 2008, Heart.

[8]  M. Lindh,et al.  Endovascular AAA exclusion: will stents with hooks and barbs prevent stent-graft migration? , 1998, Journal of endovascular surgery : the official journal of the International Society for Endovascular Surgery.

[9]  D. Bergel The static elastic properties of the arterial wall , 1961, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  Rosaire Mongrain,et al.  Comparison of Mechanical Properties of aterials Used in Aortic Arch Reconstruction , 2022 .

[11]  M. Luehr,et al.  Vascular graft replacement of the ascending and descending aorta: do Dacron grafts grow? , 2007, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[12]  R. Pifarré,et al.  Effect of an inelastic aortic synthetic vascular graft on exercise hemodynamics. , 1995, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[13]  G. Langewouters,et al.  The pressure dependent dynamic elasticity of 35 thoracic and 16 abdominal human aortas in vitro described by a five component model. , 1985, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  L. Sauvage,et al.  Effects of compliance alteration on healing of a porous dacron prosthesis in the thoracic aorta of the dog. , 1984, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.

[15]  P. Niederer,et al.  A viscoelastic model for use in predicting arterial pulse waves. , 1980, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[16]  M. Zamir,et al.  Effects of stent stiffness on local haemodynamics with particular reference to wave reflections. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  J. Chevalier,et al.  Effect of abdominal aortic grafts on aortic stiffness and central hemodynamics , 2009, Journal of hypertension.

[18]  A. Seifalian,et al.  Compliance properties of conduits used in vascular reconstruction , 2000, The British journal of surgery.

[19]  N. Stergiopulos,et al.  Validation of a one-dimensional model of the systemic arterial tree. , 2009, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[20]  P. Harris,et al.  Factors and Forces Influencing Stent-Graft Migration after Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair , 2002, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[21]  G. L’italien,et al.  Dynamic compliance of arterial grafts. , 1977, The American journal of physiology.

[22]  Lieve Lanoye,et al.  Effect of an Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm on Wave Reflection in the Aorta , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  M. Allary,et al.  Resection of an aneurysm of the abdominal aorta: reestablishment of the continuity by a preserved human arterial graft, with result after five months. , 1952, A.M.A. archives of surgery.

[24]  N. Westerhof,et al.  Forward and backward waves in the arterial system. , 1972, Cardiovascular research.

[25]  A. Seifalian,et al.  Development of a hybrid cardiovascular graft using a tissue engineering approach 1 , 2002, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.