Tumor metabolism and blood flow changes by positron emission tomography: relation to survival in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer.

PURPOSE Patients with locally advanced breast carcinoma (LABC) receive preoperative chemotherapy to provide early systemic treatment and assess in vivo tumor response. Serial positron emission tomography (PET) has been shown to predict pathologic response in this setting. We evaluated serial quantitative PET tumor blood flow (BF) and metabolism as in vivo measurements to predict patient outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS Fifty-three women with primary LABC underwent dynamic [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and [(15)O]water PET scans before and at midpoint of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The FDG metabolic rate (MRFDG) and transport (FDG K(1)) parameters were calculated; BF was estimated from the [(15)O]water study. Associations between BF, MRFDG, FDG K(1), and standardized uptake value and disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS Patients with persistent or elevated BF and FDG K(1) from baseline to midtherapy had higher recurrence and mortality risks than patients with reductions. In multivariable analyses, BF and FDG K(1) changes remained independent prognosticators of DFS and OS. For example, in the association between BF and mortality, a patient with a 5% increase in tumor BF had a 67% higher mortality risk compared with a patient with a 5% decrease in tumor BF (hazard ratio = 1.67; 95% CI, 1.24 to 2.24; P < .001). CONCLUSION LABC patients with limited or no decline in BF and FDG K(1) experienced higher recurrence and mortality risks that were greater than the effects of clinical tumor characteristics. Tumor perfusion changes over the course of neoadjuvant chemotherapy measured directly by [(15)O]water or indirectly by dynamic FDG predict DFS and OS.

[1]  S E Harms,et al.  Evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapeutic response of locally advanced breast cancer by magnetic resonance imaging , 1996, Cancer.

[2]  T W Redpath,et al.  Baseline MRI delivery characteristics predict change in invasive ductal breast carcinoma PET metabolism as a result of primary chemotherapy administration. , 2006, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[3]  B. Leone,et al.  Prognostic significance of pathological response of primary tumor and metastatic axillary lymph nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast carcinoma. , 1998, The cancer journal from Scientific American.

[4]  J. Kalbfleisch,et al.  The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data: Kalbfleisch/The Statistical , 2002 .

[5]  J. Kalbfleisch,et al.  The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data , 1980 .

[6]  I. Ellis,et al.  Assessment of the new proliferation marker MIB1 in breast carcinoma using image analysis: associations with other prognostic factors and survival. , 1995, British Journal of Cancer.

[7]  Fiona J. Gilbert,et al.  The relationship between vascular and metabolic characteristics of primary breast tumours , 2004, European Radiology.

[8]  Robert B Livingston,et al.  Blood flow and metabolism in locally advanced breast cancer: relationship to response to therapy. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[9]  C. Stearns,et al.  Investigation of the count rate performance of the General Electric Advance positron emission tomograph , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium - NSS'94.

[10]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2007 , 2007, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[11]  J. Daling,et al.  Risk of mortality by histologic type of breast cancer among women aged 50 to 79 years. , 2003, Archives of internal medicine.

[12]  F. O’Sullivan,et al.  Sarcoma tumor FDG uptake measured by PET and patient outcome: a retrospective analysis , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[13]  J. Kalbfleisch,et al.  The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data , 1980 .

[14]  Michael E. Phelps,et al.  Whole-body (18)F-FDG PET and conventional imaging for predicting outcome in previously treated breast cancer patients. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  J. Nährig,et al.  Positron emission tomography using [(18)F]Fluorodeoxyglucose for monitoring primary chemotherapy in breast cancer. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  Paul E Kinahan,et al.  Dynamic and Static Approaches to Quantifying 18F-FDG Uptake for Measuring Cancer Response to Therapy, Including the Effect of Granulocyte CSF , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  Michael E Phelps,et al.  Whole-body (18)F-FDG PET and conventional imaging for predicting outcome in previously treated breast cancer patients. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  E. Kawasaki,et al.  Accumulation of p53 tumor suppressor gene protein: an independent marker of prognosis in breast cancers. , 1992, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[19]  W. Donegan Prognostic factors: Stage and receptor status in breast cancer , 2022 .

[20]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Residual metastatic axillary lymph nodes following neoadjuvant chemotherapy predict disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. , 1998, American journal of surgery.

[21]  W D Dupont,et al.  Prognostic significance of estrogen receptor status in breast cancer in relation to tumor stage, axillary node metastasis, and histopathologic grading , 1984, Cancer.

[22]  R. Wahl,et al.  FDG metabolism and uptake versus blood flow in women with untreated primary breast cancers , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[23]  R. Hustinx,et al.  Sequential Positron Emission Tomography Using [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose for Monitoring Response to Chemotherapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[24]  T. Reichert,et al.  Radiation response non-invasively imaged by [18F]FDG-PET predicts local tumor control and survival in advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma. , 2003, Oral oncology.

[25]  B Fisher,et al.  Fifteen‐year prognostic discriminants for invasive breast carcinoma , 2001, Cancer.

[26]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  SUV varies with time after injection in (18)F-FDG PET of breast cancer: characterization and method to adjust for time differences. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[27]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  The prognostic significance of lymph node metastases after preoperative chemotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer. , 1989, Archives of surgery.

[28]  L. Sobin,et al.  TNM classification of malignant tumors, fifth edition (1997) , 1997, Cancer.

[29]  Thomas K. Lewellen,et al.  Investigation of the count rate performance of General Electric Advance positron emission tomograph , 1995 .

[30]  P F Sharp,et al.  Positron emission tomography using [(18)F]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose to predict the pathologic response of breast cancer to primary chemotherapy. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[31]  Ludovic Ferrer,et al.  Monitoring of early response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage II and III breast cancer by [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[32]  Kevin Camphausen,et al.  Antiangiogenic and antitumor effects of bevacizumab in patients with inflammatory and locally advanced breast cancer. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[33]  Robert B Livingston,et al.  Changes in blood flow and metabolism in locally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[34]  John D. Kalbfleisch,et al.  The Statistical Analysis of Failure Data , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[35]  A. Hogg,et al.  Powerful prognostic stratification by [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with high-dose chemotherapy. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[36]  D.,et al.  Regression Models and Life-Tables , 2022 .

[37]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Pathological assessment of response to induction chemotherapy in breast cancer. , 1986, Cancer research.

[38]  L. Mortelmans,et al.  Positron emission tomography for assessment of the response to induction radiochemotherapy in locally advanced oesophageal cancer. , 2002, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[39]  K. Hamacher,et al.  Efficient stereospecific synthesis of no-carrier-added 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose using aminopolyether supported nucleophilic substitution. , 1986, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[40]  Mark Muzi,et al.  18F-FDG kinetics in locally advanced breast cancer: correlation with tumor blood flow and changes in response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[41]  R L Wahl,et al.  Metabolic monitoring of breast cancer chemohormonotherapy using positron emission tomography: initial evaluation. , 1993, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[42]  D. Mankoff,et al.  Monitoring the response of patients with locally advanced breast carcinoma to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using [technetium 99m]‐sestamibi scintimammography , 1999, Cancer.

[43]  Robert B Livingston,et al.  Residual tumor uptake of [99mTc]‐sestamibi after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced breast carcinoma predicts survival , 2005, Cancer.

[44]  Ying Lu,et al.  MRI Phenotype Is Associated With Response to Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage III Breast Cancer , 2001, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[45]  Danny Rischin,et al.  Positron emission tomography is superior to computed tomography scanning for response-assessment after radical radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[46]  Joel Karp,et al.  Consensus recommendations for the use of 18F-FDG PET as an indicator of therapeutic response in patients in National Cancer Institute Trials. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[47]  R. Gilles,et al.  Locally advanced breast cancer: contrast-enhanced subtraction MR imaging of response to preoperative chemotherapy. , 1994, Radiology.

[48]  D O Cosgrove,et al.  Breast carcinoma: measurement of tumor response to primary medical therapy with color Doppler flow imaging. , 1994, Radiology.