Modelling eutrophication in mesotidal and macrotidal estuaries. The role of intertidal seaweeds

Abstract The role of intertidal seaweeds in the primary production of mesotidal and macrotidal estuaries has been examined by means of a model, applied to the Tagus Estuary (Portugal). Special attention was paid to the description of the underwater light climate in intertidal areas, and to the importance of the formation of tidal pools. Two approaches were compared for the simulation of suspended particulate matter (SPM) in the pool areas, using three algal species. The use of an erosion–deposition approach to simulate the distribution of SPM in tidal pools gives an increase in net primary productivity per unit area of between 130 and 1300%, when compared to the more conventional approach where the suspended matter in the overlying water in intertidal areas is considered identical to that in the channels. The upscaled erosion–deposition model was applied to tidal pool areas and combined with the more conventional model for other intertidal areas. Results show that annual carbon fixation by intertidal seaweeds in the estuary exceeds 13,500 t C yr−1, and accounts for 21% of the total carbon fixed by all primary producers. The corresponding nitrogen removal by seaweeds corresponds to the annual nutrient loading of a population of 490,000 inhabitants.

[1]  P. Duarte,et al.  Trophic capacity of Carlingford Lough for oyster culture – analysis by ecological modelling , 2004, Aquatic Ecology.

[2]  J. G. Ferreira Development of an estuarine quality index based on key physical and biogeochemical features , 2000 .

[3]  Terry E. Whitledge,et al.  Nutrients, irradiance, and mixing as factors regulating primary production in coastal waters impacted by the Mississippi River plume , 1999 .

[4]  J. Ferreira,et al.  A model for the estimation of annual production rates of macrophyte algae , 1989 .

[5]  P. Ruardij,et al.  Tidal Flat Estuaries , 1988, Ecological Studies.

[6]  L. Rijn Principles of sediment transport in rivers, estuaries and coastal seas , 1993 .

[7]  T. Simas,et al.  Effects of global climate change on coastal salt marshes , 2001 .

[8]  J. Ferreira,et al.  Study of heavy metals and other elements in macrophyte algae using energy‐dispersive x‐ray fluorescence , 1997 .

[9]  K. Gao,et al.  Use of macroalgae for marine biomass production and CO2 remediation: a review , 1994, Journal of Applied Phycology.

[10]  G. V. Miles,et al.  Two‐Dimensional Model of Mud Transport , 1983 .

[11]  D. Boesch Challenges and opportunities for science in reducing nutrient over-enrichment of coastal ecosystems , 2002 .

[12]  D. Hanelt,et al.  Effects of high light stress on photosynthesis of polar macroalgae in relation to depth distribution , 1997 .

[13]  M. F. Macedo,et al.  Dynamic behaviour of photosynthesis-irradiance curves determined from oxygen production during variable incubation periods , 1998 .

[14]  R. Schild,et al.  Coupling of biomass production and sedimentation of suspended sediments in eutrophic rivers , 2001 .

[15]  Emmanuel Partheniades,et al.  Erosion and Deposition of Cohesive Soils , 1965 .

[16]  A. Gustafson,et al.  A catchment-oriented and cost-effective policy for water protection. , 2000 .

[17]  K. Black,et al.  Suspended Sediment Dynamics and Bed Erosion in the High Shore Mudflat Region of the Humber Estuary, UK , 1999 .

[18]  J. Cloern The relative importance of light and nutrient limitation of phytoplankton growth: a simple index of coastal ecosystem sensitivity to nutrient enrichment , 1999, Aquatic Ecology.

[19]  D. Kay,et al.  Estimated inorganic nutrient inputs to the coastal waters of Jersey from catchment and waste water sources , 2000 .

[20]  K. Sabbe,et al.  Spring phytoplankton assemblages in and around the maximum turbidity zone of the estuaries of the Elbe (Germany), the Schelde (Belgium/The Netherlands) and the Gironde (France) , 1999 .

[21]  E. Toorman,et al.  The characterisation of cohesive sediment properties , 1993 .

[22]  S. Jørgensen,et al.  Description of the three shallow estuaries: Mondego River (Portugal), Roskilde Fjord (Denmark) and the Lagoon of Venice (Italy) , 1997 .

[23]  Marta Estrada,et al.  Marine ecological processes (2nd edn): by I. Valiela Springer-Veriag, 1995. DM98.00 hbk (xiv + 686 pages) ISBN 0 387 943218 , 1996 .

[24]  M. García-León,et al.  Modelling the suspended matter distribution in an estuarine system. Application to the Odiel river in southwest Spain , 1996 .

[25]  J. Serôdio,et al.  Modelling the primary productivity of intertidal microphytobenthos: time scales of variability and effects of migratory rhythms , 2000 .

[26]  Thomas D. Brock,et al.  Calculating solar radiation for ecological studies , 1981 .

[27]  R. Herbert Nitrogen cycling in coastal marine ecosystems. , 1999, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[28]  L. Kamp-Nielsen,et al.  Description (Portugal), of the three shallow estuaries: Mondego River Roskilde Fjord (Denmark) and the Lagoon of Venice (Italy) , 1997 .

[29]  S. Bricker,et al.  National estuarine eutrophication assessment: effects of nutrient enrichment in the nation's estuaries , 1999 .

[30]  P. Ruardij,et al.  Tidal Flat Estuaries. Simulation and Analysis of the Ems Estuary , 1988 .

[31]  M. V. Wijngaarden A two‐dimensional model for suspended sediment transport in the southern branch of the Rhine–Meuse estuary, The Netherlands , 1999 .

[32]  S. Gianesella,et al.  Tidal effects on nutrients and phytoplankton distribution in Bertioga Channel, São Paulo, Brazil , 2000 .

[33]  Ivan Valiela,et al.  Marine Ecological Processes , 1984, Springer Advanced Texts in Life Sciences.