Intention tremor rated according to different finger-to-nose test protocols: a survey.

OBJECTIVES To investigate the dependence of intention tremor rating scores on different finger-to-nose test (FNT) protocols, varying in arm position and the time the finger has to be kept on the nose, and to examine their relevance to function. DESIGN Observational survey. Video recordings were made while patients performed the FNTs and functional tasks such as pouring water. SETTING Three European rehabilitation centers in Belgium, Finland, and England. PARTICIPANTS Twenty-six multiple sclerosis patients with intention tremor (avg age, 44.1y). INTERVENTIONS Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Six examiners rated the degree of intention tremor by using the Fahn Tremor Rating Scale. RESULTS Interrater reliability for rating intention tremor during the FNTs was high (kappa=.65-.74). Both the required arm position and time constraints affected the magnitude of intention tremor rating scores (mean rank, 2.27-2.95) and their functional relevance (rho=.70-.84). Intention tremor was scored the highest when the arm was lifted to 90 degrees of abduction at the shoulder and the subject was required to stabilize the finger on the nose. However, its functional relevance was lower compared with a more "functionally" executed FNT. CONCLUSIONS The rating of intention tremor during the FNT depends on test instructions. A standardized protocol is needed.

[1]  M. Brin,et al.  Consensus Statement of the Movement Disorder Society on Tremor , 2008, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[2]  P. Bain,et al.  A study of tremor in multiple sclerosis. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[3]  D. Kondziolka,et al.  Functional outcomes after gamma knife thalamotomy for essential tremor and MS-related tremor , 2000, Neurology.

[4]  G. Deuschl,et al.  Essential tremor and cerebellar dysfunction clinical and kinematic analysis of intention tremor. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  P. Bain,et al.  Evaluation of three different ways of assessing tremor in multiple sclerosis , 2000, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[6]  B Pentland,et al.  Rater reliability of Fahn's tremor rating scale in patients with multiple sclerosis. , 1998, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  R. Hébert,et al.  Upper-extremity motor co-ordination of healthy elderly people. , 1995, Age and ageing.

[8]  M. A. Werz,et al.  The Human Brain , 1993, Neurology.

[9]  S. J. Sullivan,et al.  Reliability of the scores for the finger-to-nose test in adults with traumatic brain injury. , 1993, Physical therapy.

[10]  P. Prescott,et al.  Issues in the Use of Kappa to Estimate Reliability , 1986, Medical care.

[11]  R. W. Russell MALNUTRITION AND RETARDED HUMAN DEVELOPMENT , 1973 .

[12]  P Ketelaer,et al.  Assistive technology to improve PC interaction for people with intention tremor. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[13]  G. Kraft Rehabilitation principles for patients with multiple sclerosis. , 1998, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[14]  W. Demyer Reviews and Notes: Neurology: Technique of the Neurologic Examination: A Programmed Text , 1995, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[15]  I. Bone,et al.  Neurology and Neurosurgery Illustrated , 1986 .

[16]  A. Aronson Clinical examinations in neurology , 1971 .

[17]  R. Duvoisin Neurological Examination in Clinical Practice. , 1964 .