Ipsilesional Biases in Saccades but not Perception after Lesions of the Human Inferior Parietal Lobule

We examined the effects of chronic unilateral lesions to either the inferior parietal lobe, or to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex including the frontal eye fields (FEFs), upon human visual perception and saccades in temporal-order-judgment (TOJ) tasks. Two visual events were presented on each trial, one in each hemifield at various stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs). In the saccade task, patients moved their eyes to whichever stimulus attracted gaze first. In the perceptual-manual task, they pressed a button to indicate which stimulus was perceived first. Frontal patients showed appropriate TOJs for visual targets in both tasks. Parietal patients showed appropriate TOJs in the perceptual-manual but not the saccade task; their saccades tended to be ipsilesional unless the contralesional target led substantially. This reveals a bias in saccade choice after parietal damage that cannot be attributed to deficient visual perception. These results challenge previous claims that only anterior lesions produce motoric spatial biases in humans. However, they are in accord with recent neurophysiological evidence for parietal involvement in saccade generation, and also with suggestions that visuomotor transformations in the parietal lobe serving direct spatial motor responses can dissociate from conscious perception as indicated by indirect arbitrary responses.

[1]  K. Roberts,et al.  Through a Looking Glass , 1999, Clinical nursing research.

[2]  R. Andersen,et al.  Motor intention activity in the macaque's lateral intraparietal area. I. Dissociation of motor plan from sensory memory. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  J. Schall,et al.  Role of frontal eye fields in countermanding saccades: visual, movement, and fixation activity. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  M. L. Rusconi,et al.  Perceptual and premotor factors of unilateral neglect , 1990, Neurology.

[5]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Endogenously Generated and Visually Guided Saccades after Lesions of the Human Frontal Eye Fields , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  J R Duhamel,et al.  The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements. , 1992, Science.

[7]  G. Stelmach,et al.  Tutorials in Motor Behavior , 1980 .

[8]  R. Andersen,et al.  Effect of reversible inactivation of macaque lateral intraparietal area on visual and memory saccades. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  R. Rafal,et al.  Localization of the human frontal eye fields and motor hand area with transcranial magnetic stimulation and magnetic resonance imaging , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  Edoardo Bisiach,et al.  Perceptual and Response Bias in Unilateral Neglect: Two Modified Versions of the Milner Landmark Task , 1998, Brain and Cognition.

[11]  Michael I. Posner,et al.  14 Attention and the Control of Movements , 1980 .

[12]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Activity of neurons in the lateral intraparietal area of the monkey during an antisaccade task , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  R. Andersen,et al.  Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements. , 1997, Annual review of neuroscience.

[14]  M. Mesulam A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect , 1981, Annals of neurology.

[15]  A. Milner,et al.  Line bisection errors in visual neglect: Misguided action or size distortion? , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[17]  R. Andersen,et al.  Coding of intention in the posterior parietal cortex , 1997, Nature.

[18]  W. Heide,et al.  Cortical control of double‐step saccades: Implications for spatial orientation , 1995, Annals of neurology.

[19]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Saccadic dysmetria in a patient with a right frontoparietal lesion. The importance of corollary discharge for accurate spatial behaviour. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[20]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Visual extinction and prior entry: Impaired perception of temporal order with intact motion perception after unilateral parietal damage , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Phasic alerting of neglect patients overcomes their spatial deficit in visual awareness , 1998, Nature.

[22]  T. Paus Location and function of the human frontal eye-field: A selective review , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  R. Andersen,et al.  Motor intention activity in the macaque's lateral intraparietal area. II. Changes of motor plan. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  K. Booth,et al.  The Neglect Syndrome , 1982, Journal of neurosurgical nursing.

[25]  Km. Heilmann,et al.  The neglect syndrome , 1985 .

[26]  R. Rafal Neglect , 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[27]  C. Pierrot-Deseilligny,et al.  Cortical control of saccades , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Parietal neglect and visual awareness , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  R. Tegnér,et al.  Through a looking glass. A new technique to demonstrate directional hypokinesia in unilateral neglect. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[30]  E. Ldavas,et al.  Eye Movements and Orienting of Attention in Patients with Visual Neglect , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  Y Agid,et al.  Cortical control of reflexive visually-guided saccades. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[32]  Jason B. Mattingley,et al.  Motor role of human inferior parietal lobe revealed in unilateral neglect patients , 1998, Nature.

[33]  R. Andersen,et al.  Change in motor plan, without a change in the spatial locus of attention, modulates activity in posterior parietal cortex. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Visual, presaccadic, and cognitive activation of single neurons in monkey lateral intraparietal area. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  P. H. Schiller,et al.  The effects of frontal eye field and dorsomedial frontal cortex lesions on visually guided eye movements , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.