The Cross-Validated Adaptive Signature Design

Purpose: Many anticancer therapies benefit only a subset of treated patients and may be overlooked by the traditional broad eligibility approach to design phase III clinical trials. New biotechnologies such as microarrays can be used to identify the patients that are most likely to benefit from anticancer therapies. However, due to the high-dimensional nature of the genomic data, developing a reliable classifier by the time the definitive phase III trail is designed may not be feasible. Experimental Design: Previously, Freidlin and Simon (Clinical Cancer Research, 2005) introduced the adaptive signature design that combines a prospective development of a sensitive patient classifier and a properly powered test for overall effect in a single pivotal trial. In this article, we propose a cross-validation extension of the adaptive signature design that optimizes the efficiency of both the classifier development and the validation components of the design. Results: The new design is evaluated through simulations and is applied to data from a randomized breast cancer trial. Conclusion: The cross-validation approach is shown to considerably improve the performance of the adaptive signature design. We also describe approaches to the estimation of the treatment effect for the identified sensitive subpopulation. Clin Cancer Res; 16(2); 691–8

[1]  F. Balis,et al.  Evolution of anticancer drug discovery and the role of cell-based screening. , 2002, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[2]  R. Schilsky End points in cancer clinical trials and the drug approval process. , 2002, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[3]  Mace L. Rothenberg,et al.  Improving the evaluation of new cancer treatments: challenges and opportunities , 2003, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[4]  M. Radmacher,et al.  Pitfalls in the use of DNA microarray data for diagnostic and prognostic classification. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[5]  E. Wit Design and Analysis of DNA Microarray Investigations , 2004, Human Genomics.

[6]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Bagging Predictors , 1996, Machine Learning.

[7]  R. Simon,et al.  Adaptive Signature Design: An Adaptive Clinical Trial Design for Generating and Prospectively Testing A Gene Expression Signature for Sensitive Patients , 2005, Clinical Cancer Research.

[8]  Annette M. Molinaro,et al.  Prediction error estimation: a comparison of resampling methods , 2005, Bioinform..

[9]  Richard Simon,et al.  Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[10]  A. Nobel,et al.  Concordance among Gene-Expression – Based Predictors for Breast Cancer , 2011 .

[11]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[12]  J. Nevins,et al.  Validation of gene signatures that predict the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a substudy of the EORTC 10994/BIG 00-01 clinical trial. , 2007, The Lancet. Oncology.

[13]  S. Küçücük,et al.  Lower Level of MAPK Expression Is Associated with Anthracycline Resistance and Decreased Survival in Patients with Hormone Receptor Negative Breast Cancer , 2008, Cancer investigation.

[14]  Antje Hoering,et al.  Randomized Phase III Clinical Trial Designs for Targeted Agents , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.