Incorporating Non-sequential Behavior into Click Models

Click-through information is considered as a valuable source of users' implicit relevance feedback. As user behavior is usually influenced by a number of factors such as position, presentation style and site reputation, researchers have proposed a variety of assumptions (i.e.~click models) to generate a reasonable estimation of result relevance. The construction of click models usually follow some hypotheses. For example, most existing click models follow the sequential examination hypothesis in which users examine results from top to bottom in a linear fashion. While these click models have been successful, many recent studies showed that there is a large proportion of non-sequential browsing (both examination and click) behaviors in Web search, which the previous models fail to cope with. In this paper, we investigate the problem of properly incorporating non-sequential behavior into click models. We firstly carry out a laboratory eye-tracking study to analyze user's non-sequential examination behavior and then propose a novel click model named Partially Sequential Click Model (PSCM) that captures the practical behavior of users. We compare PSCM with a number of existing click models using two real-world search engine logs. Experimental results show that PSCM outperforms other click models in terms of both predicting click behavior (perplexity) and estimating result relevance (NDCG and user preference test). We also publicize the implementations of PSCM and related datasets for possible future comparison studies.

[1]  Yi Chang,et al.  A unified search federation system based on online user feedback , 2013, KDD.

[2]  K. Rayner The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  Yiqun Liu,et al.  From Skimming to Reading: A Two-stage Examination Model for Web Search , 2014, CIKM.

[4]  Qiang Yang,et al.  Beyond ten blue links: enabling user click modeling in federated web search , 2012, WSDM '12.

[5]  Grace Hui Yang,et al.  Collecting high quality overlapping labels at low cost , 2010, SIGIR.

[6]  Ryen W. White,et al.  No clicks, no problem: using cursor movements to understand and improve search , 2011, CHI.

[7]  Jaana Kekäläinen,et al.  Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques , 2002, TOIS.

[8]  Edward Cutrell,et al.  What are you looking for?: an eye-tracking study of information usage in web search , 2007, CHI.

[9]  Yisong Yue,et al.  Beyond position bias: examining result attractiveness as a source of presentation bias in clickthrough data , 2010, WWW '10.

[10]  Andrei Broder,et al.  A taxonomy of web search , 2002, SIGF.

[11]  Thorsten Joachims,et al.  Eye-tracking analysis of user behavior in WWW search , 2004, SIGIR '04.

[12]  Nick Craswell,et al.  An experimental comparison of click position-bias models , 2008, WSDM '08.

[13]  Olivier Chapelle,et al.  A dynamic bayesian network click model for web search ranking , 2009, WWW '09.

[14]  Benjamin Piwowarski,et al.  A user browsing model to predict search engine click data from past observations. , 2008, SIGIR '08.

[15]  Mark Sanderson,et al.  Do user preferences and evaluation measures line up? , 2010, SIGIR.

[16]  Chao Liu,et al.  Efficient multiple-click models in web search , 2009, WSDM '09.

[17]  Thorsten Joachims,et al.  The influence of task and gender on search and evaluation behavior using Google , 2006, Inf. Process. Manag..

[18]  Xiaolong Li,et al.  Inferring search behaviors using partially observable Markov (POM) model , 2010, WSDM '10.

[19]  Dmitry Lagun,et al.  Improving Relevance Prediction by Addressing Biases and Sparsity in Web Search Click Data , 2012 .

[20]  Thorsten Joachims,et al.  Accurately interpreting clickthrough data as implicit feedback , 2005, SIGIR '05.

[21]  Yiqun Liu,et al.  Incorporating revisiting behaviors into click models , 2012, WSDM '12.

[22]  M. de Rijke,et al.  Click model-based information retrieval metrics , 2013, SIGIR.

[23]  Alexander J. Smola,et al.  Measurement and modeling of eye-mouse behavior in the presence of nonlinear page layouts , 2013, WWW.

[24]  Anthony Jameson,et al.  Depth- and breadth-first processing of search result lists , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[25]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  Learning user interaction models for predicting web search result preferences , 2006, SIGIR.

[26]  Ciya Liao,et al.  A model to estimate intrinsic document relevance from the clickthrough logs of a web search engine , 2010, WSDM '10.

[27]  Joseph H. Goldberg,et al.  Identifying fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols , 2000, ETRA.

[28]  Erick Cantú-Paz,et al.  Temporal click model for sponsored search , 2010, SIGIR.

[29]  Yiqun Liu,et al.  Incorporating vertical results into search click models , 2013, SIGIR.

[30]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Large-scale analysis of individual and task differences in search result page examination strategies , 2012, WSDM '12.

[31]  Maya R. Gupta,et al.  Theory and Use of the EM Algorithm , 2011, Found. Trends Signal Process..

[32]  Yiqun Liu,et al.  Revisiting the Evaluation of Diversified Search Evaluation Metrics with User Preferences , 2014, AIRS.