Interpreting pronouns and demonstratives in Finnish: Evidence for a form-specific approach to reference resolution

Two Finnish language comprehension experiments are presented which suggest that the referential properties of pronouns and demonstratives cannot be reduced straightforwardly to the salience level of the antecedent. The findings, from a sentence completion study and visual world eye-tracking study, reveal an asymmetry in which features of the antecedent Finnish pronouns and demonstratives are most sensitive to, both in terms of their final interpretations and during real-time processing. In particular, the syntactic role and linear position of the antecedent, two factors which have been claimed to influence referent salience, have different effects on the interpretation of pronouns and demonstratives. Contrary to what is commonly assumed, pronouns and demonstratives cannot be mapped onto a unified salience hierarchy, because they exhibit different degrees of sensitivity to syntactic role and word order. We offer an alternative approach to anaphor resolution, the form-specific multiple-constraints approach.

[1]  M G Saslow,et al.  Latency for saccadic eye movement. , 1967, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[2]  Roger M. Cooper,et al.  The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language: A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing. , 1974 .

[3]  W. Chafe Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view , 1976 .

[4]  S. Garrod,et al.  THE MENTAL REPRESENTATION OF DISCOURSE IN A FOCUSSED MEMORY SYSTEM: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE INTERPRETATION OF ANAPHORIC NOUN PHRASES , 1982 .

[5]  Eva Hajicová,et al.  The Role of the Hierarchy of Activation in the Process of Natural Language Understanding , 1982, COLING.

[6]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1986 .

[7]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness , 1985 .

[8]  T. Givon Topic Continuity in Discourse , 1983 .

[9]  T. Givón,et al.  Topic continuity in discourse : a quantitative cross-language study , 1983 .

[10]  Carl Pollard,et al.  A Centering Approach to Pronouns , 1987, ACL.

[11]  M. Gernsbacher,et al.  Accessing Sentence Participants: The Advantage of First Mention. , 1988, Journal of memory and language.

[12]  Riitta Välimaa‐Blum,et al.  Finnish existential clauses – their syntax, pragmatics and intonation , 1988 .

[13]  Havaintoja hän- ja he-pronominien käytöstä suomen murteissa , 1989 .

[14]  Maria Vilkuna,et al.  Free word order in Finnish , 1989 .

[15]  Rosemary J. Stevenson,et al.  Reference in single sentences and in texts , 1990, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[16]  Enric Vallduví,et al.  The Informational Component , 1990 .

[17]  Eva Hajicová,et al.  Hierarchy of Salience and Discourse Analysis and Production , 1990, COLING.

[18]  Riitta Välimaa-Blum Compte-rendu de lecture de : « Maria Vilkuna : Free Word Order in Finnish: Its Syntax and Discourse Functions. Helsinki : Suomalaisen kirjallisuuden seura, 1989. » , 1991 .

[19]  Empathy as motivation for style shifting in narrative , 1991 .

[20]  Andrew Chesterman,et al.  On Definiteness: On Definiteness , 1991 .

[21]  Lea Laitinen Välttämättömyys ja persoona : Suomen murteiden nesessiivisten rakenteiden semantiikkaa ja kielioppia , 1992 .

[22]  Alan Garnham,et al.  The role of implicit causality and gender cue in the interpretation of pronouns , 1992 .

[23]  E. Prince The ZPG Letter: Subjects, Definiteness, and Information-status , 1992 .

[24]  Barbara J. Grosz,et al.  Pronouns, Names, and the Centering of Attention in Discourse , 1993, Cogn. Sci..

[25]  Jeanette K. Gundel,et al.  Cognitive Status and the Form of Referring Expressions in Discourse , 1993 .

[26]  K. Boff,et al.  Saccadic overhead: Information-processing time with and without saccades , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  E. Williams,et al.  Indices and identity , 1994 .

[28]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[29]  Helena Halmari On Accessibility and Coreference , 1994, Nordic Journal of Linguistics.

[30]  Shalom Lappin,et al.  An Algorithm for Pronominal Anaphora Resolution , 1994, CL.

[31]  Scott Weinstein,et al.  Centering: A Framework for Modeling the Local Coherence of Discourse , 1995, CL.

[32]  Megumi Kameyama,et al.  Indefeasible Semantics and Defeasible Pragmatics , 1994, ArXiv.

[33]  L P Shapiro,et al.  On-line comprehension of VP-ellipsis: Syntactic reconstruction and semantic influence , 1995, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[34]  Katalin É. Kiss,et al.  Discourse configurational languages , 1995 .

[35]  P. Gordon,et al.  Pronouns, Passives, and Discourse Coherence , 1995 .

[36]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Subject Terms: Linguistics Language Eyes & eyesight Cognition & reasoning , 1995 .

[37]  U. Turan Null vs. Overt Subjects in Turkish Discourse: A Centering Analysis , 1995 .

[38]  Barbara Di Eugenio,et al.  Centering in Italian , 1996, ArXiv.

[39]  Udo Hahn,et al.  Functional Centering , 1996, ACL.

[40]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  Eye Movements and Spoken Language Comprehension , 1996, ACL.

[41]  K. Hirsh-Pasek,et al.  The intermodal preferential looking paradigm: A window onto emerging language comprehension. , 1996 .

[42]  J. Hyönä,et al.  Effects of Case Marking and Word Order on Sentence Parsing in Finnish: An Eye Fixation Analysis , 1997 .

[43]  E. Prince Word Order, Information Structure, and Centering in Turkish , 1997 .

[44]  Megumi Kameyama,et al.  Stressed and Unstressed Pronouns: Complementary Preferences , 1997, ArXiv.

[45]  Läsnäolon pronominit: tämä, tuo, se ja hän viittaamassa keskustelun osallistujaan. , 1998 .

[46]  Pronominit hän ja tämä tekstissä , 1998 .

[47]  Jennifer E. Arnold Reference form and discourse patterns , 1998 .

[48]  Charles Clifton,et al.  Accessing singular antecedents in conjoined phrases , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[49]  A. D. Dominicis,et al.  Intonation Systems: A Survey of Twenty Languages , 1999 .

[50]  Udo Hahn,et al.  Functional Centering - Grounding Referential Coherence in Information Structure , 1999, Comput. Linguistics.

[51]  Elsi Kaiser,et al.  Pronouns and Demonstratives in Finnish: Indicators of Referent Salience , 2000 .

[52]  Sarah Brown-Schmidt,et al.  The rapid use of gender information: evidence of the time course of pronoun resolution from eyetracking , 2000, Cognition.

[53]  Michael Strube,et al.  Discourse Salience and Pronoun Resolution in Hindi , 2000 .

[54]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Subcategorical mismatches and the time course of lexical access: Evidence for lexical competition , 2001 .

[55]  Marja-Liisa Helasvuo Syntax in the making , 2001 .

[56]  John C. Trueswell,et al.  On Choosing the Parse with the Scene: The Role of Visual Context and Verb bias in Ambiguity Resolution , 2001 .

[57]  Alan Garnham,et al.  Mental models and the interpretation of anaphora , 2001 .

[58]  Mira Ariel Accessibility theory: An overview , 2001 .

[59]  A. Hollingworth,et al.  Thematic Roles Assigned along the Garden Path Linger , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[60]  W. Badecker,et al.  The processing role of structural constraints on the interpretation of pronouns and anaphors. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[61]  Arild Hestvik,et al.  Charting the time-course of VP-ellipsis sentence comprehension: Evidence for an initial and independent structural analysis. , 2003, Journal of memory and language.

[62]  Elsi Kaiser,et al.  The quest for a referent: A crosslinguistic look at reference resolution , 2003 .

[63]  Yuki Kamide,et al.  Now you see it, now you don't: mediating the mapping between language and the visual world , 2004 .

[64]  David I. Beaver,et al.  The Optimization of Discourse Anaphora , 2004 .

[65]  Daniel C. Richardson,et al.  Effects of merely local syntactic coherence on sentence processing , 2004 .

[66]  J. Trueswell,et al.  The role of discourse context in the processing of a flexible word-order language , 2004, Cognition.

[67]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  Why Look? Reasons for Eye Movements Related to Language Production. , 2004 .

[68]  J. Trueswell,et al.  The developing constraints on parsing decisions: The role of lexical-biases and referential scenes in child and adult sentence processing , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[69]  Different Forms Have Different Referential Properties: Implications for the Notion of ‘Salience’ , 2005 .

[70]  M. Tanenhaus,et al.  Beyond salience: Interpretation of personal and demonstrative pronouns , 2005 .

[71]  Jennifer E. Arnold,et al.  Children's use of gender and order-of-mention during pronoun comprehension , 2007 .

[72]  Owen Rambow,et al.  Pragmatic Aspects of Scrambling and Topicalization in German: A Centering Approach , 2007 .

[74]  Paul G. Smith,et al.  Cyclic strain-induced HSP27 phosphorylation modulates actin filaments in airway smooth muscle cells. , 2008, American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology.