Trade off between quantity and size of pollen grains in the heterandrous flowers of Senna pendula (Fabaceae)

Heteranthery, the presence of different types of stamens in a flower, may reduce the conflict between pollinators and plants by ensuring the resource for the pollinator without drastically affecting the availability of viable male gametes for fertilization, according to the division-of-labor hypothesis. We investigated whether the poricidal anthers of Senna pendula, a buzz-pollinated heterantherous species, present morphological and physiological differences among pollen grains from the three sets of stamens. We compared quantity, ornamentation, size and fecundity of pollen from long, medium and short stamens. The short feeding stamens produced larger but fewer pollen grains than the long pollinating stamens, which produced smaller pollen grains but in higher quantity. The total pollen volume of pollinating and feeding stamens per flower, however, was the same. The medium stamen produced lessfertile small pollen grains and seems to play no specific role in bee feeding and pollination. Our results indicate differential allocation of pollen for pollinating and feeding stamens mediated by heteranthery. The differences in volume versus quantity of pollen grains fit the division-of-labor hypothesis well for heterantherous pollen-only flowers with poricidal anthers.

[1]  A. Russell,et al.  The evolution of floral sonication, a pollen foraging behavior used by bees (Anthophila) , 2018, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[2]  E. Forni-Martins,et al.  Ricochet pollination in Senna (Fabaceae) - petals deflect pollen jets and promote division of labour among flower structures. , 2017, Plant biology.

[3]  C. Schlindwein,et al.  Heteranthery as a solution to the demand for pollen as food and for pollination - Legitimate flower visitors reject flowers without feeding anthers. , 2017, Plant biology.

[4]  D. Papaj,et al.  How a generalist bee achieves high efficiency of pollen collection on diverse floral resources , 2017 .

[5]  D. Papaj,et al.  Division of labor of anthers in heterantherous plants: flexibility of bee pollen collection behavior may serve to keep plants honest , 2017, Arthropod-Plant Interactions.

[6]  Shuang‐Quan Huang,et al.  Safe sites of pollen placement: a conflict of interest between plants and bees? , 2017, Oecologia.

[7]  F. P. D. Araújo,et al.  Economia de pólen favorecida pela heteranteria em Desmocelis villosa (Melastomataceae) , 2016 .

[8]  M. Vallejo‐Marín,et al.  Recurrent modification of floral morphology in heterantherous Solanum reveals a parallel shift in reproductive strategy , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[10]  M. Vallejo‐Marín,et al.  What's the 'buzz' about? The ecology and evolutionary significance of buzz-pollination. , 2013, Current opinion in plant biology.

[11]  Wellington Lopes Assis Os climas naturais do município de Belo Horizonte – MG , 2012 .

[12]  M. Vallejo‐Marín,et al.  Trait correlates and functional significance of heteranthery in flowering plants. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[13]  S. Barrett Darwin's legacy: the forms, function and sexual diversity of flowers , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  J. Thomson,et al.  Division of labour within flowers: heteranthery, a floral strategy to reconcile contrasting pollen fates , 2009, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[15]  Lei Gu,et al.  Intrafloral differentiation of stamens in heterantherous flowers , 2009 .

[16]  B. Marazzi,et al.  Patterns and development of floral asymmetry in Senna (Leguminosae, Cassiinae). , 2008, American journal of botany.

[17]  Shuang‐Quan Huang,et al.  Evidence for reductions in floral attractants with increased selfing rates in two heterandrous species. , 2007, The New phytologist.

[18]  R. Classen-Bockhoff,et al.  Bilabiate flowers: the ultimate response to bees? , 2007, Annals of botany.

[19]  E. Conti,et al.  Diversity in Anthers and Stigmas in the Buzz‐Pollinated Genus Senna (Leguminosae, Cassiinae) , 2007, International Journal of Plant Sciences.

[20]  E. Conti,et al.  Phylogenetic relationships within Senna (Leguminosae, Cassiinae) based on three chloroplast DNA regions: patterns in the evolution of floral symmetry and extrafloral nectaries. , 2006, American journal of botany.

[21]  R. Cruden Pollen grains: Why so many? , 2000, Plant Systematics and Evolution.

[22]  Paulo Eugênio de Oliveira,et al.  Biologia reprodutiva e polinização de Senna sylvestris (Vell.) H.S. Irwin & Barneby (Leguminosae, Caesalpinioideae) , 2003 .

[23]  C. Gross,et al.  FORAGING STRATEGIES OF AMEGILLA ANOMOLA AT THE FLOWERS OF MELASTOMA AFFINE -NO EVIDENCE FOR SEPARATE FEEDING AND POLLINATING ANTHERS , 2001 .

[24]  J. Cane,et al.  WHAT GOVERNS PROTEIN CONTENT OF POLLEN: POLLINATOR PREFERENCES, POLLEN–PISTIL INTERACTIONS, OR PHYLOGENY? , 2000 .

[25]  D. Lloyd The selection of social actions in families: III. Reproductively disabled individuals and organs , 2000 .

[26]  R. Lokesha,et al.  ANTHER DIMORPHISM, DIFFERENTIAL ANTHER DEHISCENCE, POLLEN VIABILITY AND POLLINATION SUCCESS IN CAESALPINIA PULCHERRIMMA L. (FABACEAE) , 1999 .

[27]  C. Westerkamp Pollen in Bee-Flower Relations Some Considerations on Melittophily* , 1996 .

[28]  L. Harder,et al.  SIZE-NUMBER TRADE-OFFS, AND POLLEN PRODUCTION BY PAPILIONACEOUS LEGUMES , 1995 .

[29]  P. Klinkhamer,et al.  Attractiveness to pollinators : a plant's dilemma , 1993 .

[30]  F. A. Silveira Influence of pollen grain volume on the estimation of the relative importance of its source to bees , 1991 .

[31]  G. Gottsberger,et al.  Evolution of flower structures and pollination in neotropical Cassiinae (Caesalpiniaceae) species , 1988 .

[32]  S. Buchmann Buzz pollination in angiosperms. , 1983 .

[33]  G. Lewis,et al.  The American Cassiinae: A Synoptical Revision of Leguminosae Tribe Cassieae subtribe Cassiinae in the New World , 1982 .

[34]  R. Dulberger THE FLORAL BIOLOGY OF CASSIA DIDYMOBOTRYA AND C. AURICULATA (CAESALPINIACEAE) , 1981 .

[35]  R. Cruden,et al.  VISCIN THREADS, POLLINATION EFFICIENCY AND LOW POLLEN‐OVULE RATIOS , 1979 .

[36]  S. Vogel Evolutionary shifts from reward to deception in pollen flowers , 1978 .

[37]  R. Cruden POLLEN‐OVULE RATIOS: A CONSERVATIVE INDICATOR OF BREEDING SYSTEMS IN FLOWERING PLANTS , 1977, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[38]  S. Buchmann Buzz Pollination of Cassia quiedondilla (Leguminosae) by Bees of the Genera Centris and Melipona , 1974 .

[39]  D. G. Lloyd,et al.  BREEDING SYSTEMS IN COTULA L. (COMPOSITAE, ANTHEMIDEAE) II. MONOECIOUS POPULATIONS , 1972 .

[40]  Knut Faegri,et al.  The principles of pollination ecology , 1967 .

[41]  C. Michener An Interesting Method of Pollen Collecting by Bees from Flowers with Tubular Anthers , 1962 .

[42]  J. Hannay Natural Selection and Natural Theology , 1883, Nature.

[43]  F. Müller Two Kinds of Stamens with Different Functions in the Same Flower , 1883, Nature.

[44]  H. Müller Two Kinds of Stamens with Different Functions in the same Flower , 1881, Nature.