Target Age and the Acquisition of Innovation in High-Technology Industries

External acquisition of new technology is a growing trend in the innovation and product development process, particularly in high-technology industries, as firms complement internal research and development efforts with aggressive acquisition programs. Yet, despite its importance, there has been little empirical research on the timing of acquisition decisions in high-technology environments. Should organizations wait until more information is available about the target and its markets so that a better valuation can be obtained? Or should the target be acquired early to lower acquisition cost and gain early access to key technologies? Applying an event study methodology to technology acquisitions in the telecommunications industry from 1995 to 2001, we find evidence that supports acquiring early in the face of uncertainty. Our analytical model and empirical analysis uncover two characteristics of young targets that drive benefits from early acquisitions---flexible growth options that provide greater opportunities for synergistic fit, and greater valuation uncertainty that leads to lower prices. However, the negative effect of target age on acquirer value is partially mitigated if the target has recent patents or is privately held. In addition, the probability of acquisition is higher for targets that have signals of higher quality, and lower for targets that have superior access to capital and resources.

[1]  M. Iansiti Shooting the Rapids: Managing Product Development in Turbulent Environments , 1995 .

[2]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[3]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  50th Anniversary Article: Technological Innovation, Product Development, and Entrepreneurship in Management Science , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[4]  Franco Malerba,et al.  Schumpeterian patterns of innovative activity in the ICT field , 2007 .

[5]  Jesper B. Sørensen,et al.  Aging, Obsolescence, and Organizational Innovation , 2000 .

[6]  Rosemarie H. Ziedonis Don't Fence Me in: Fragmented Markets for Technology and the Patent Acquisition Strategies of Firms , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[7]  G. Rao,et al.  Open Innovation , 2019, Strategic Decisions.

[8]  Nadia Bhuiyan,et al.  Simulation of the New Product Development Process for Performance Improvement , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[9]  Erik Stafford,et al.  New Evidence and Perspectives on Mergers , 2001 .

[10]  Jerold B. Warner,et al.  Using daily stock returns: The case of event studies , 1985 .

[11]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Product Development Decisions: A Review of the Literature , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[12]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers , 1999 .

[13]  Saeyoung Chang,et al.  Takeovers of Privately Held Targets, Methods of Payment, and Bidder Returns , 1998 .

[14]  Z. Griliches Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[15]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  Auctions and Bidding: A Primer , 1989 .

[16]  David Stolin,et al.  Returns to Acquirers of Listed and Unlisted Targets , 2004, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[17]  E. Maasland,et al.  Auction Theory , 2021, Springer Texts in Business and Economics.

[18]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Measuring the Effectiveness of Overlapping Development Activities , 1999 .

[19]  J. Goeree,et al.  Efficiency in auctions with Private and Common Values , 2002 .

[20]  A. Mackinlay,et al.  Event Studies in Economics and Finance , 1997 .

[21]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[22]  R. McAfee,et al.  Auctions and Bidding , 1986 .

[23]  Rita Gunther McGrath,et al.  Real options reasoning and a new look at the R&D investment strategies of pharmaceutical firms , 2004 .

[24]  Micah S. Officer,et al.  The Price of Corporate Liquidity: Acquisition Discounts for Unlisted Targets , 2007 .

[25]  V. Krishnan,et al.  Technology Selection and Commitment in New Product Development: The Role of Uncertainty and Design Flexibility , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[26]  Venkatesh Shankar,et al.  Asymmetric New Product Development Alliances: Win-Win or Win-Lose Partnerships? , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[27]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Project Management Under Risk: Using the Real Options Approach to Evaluate Flexibility in R...D , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[28]  Jeffry Netter,et al.  What do returns to acquiring firms tell us? Evidence from firms that make many acquisitions , 2002 .

[29]  Christopher S. Tang,et al.  Modelling the Costs and Benefits of Delayed Product Differentiation , 1997 .

[30]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Market value and patent citations , 2005 .

[31]  Suresh Kotha,et al.  Continuous “Morphing”: Competing Through Dynamic Capabilities, Form, and Function , 2001 .

[32]  G. Tellis,et al.  Research on Innovation: A Review and Agenda for Marketing Science , 2006 .

[33]  René M. Stulz,et al.  Wealth Destruction on a Massive Scale? A Study of Acquiring-Firm Returns in the Recent Merger Wave , 2004 .

[34]  Jack A. Nickerson,et al.  Strategic Management of R&D Pipelines with Cospecialized Investments and Technology Markets , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[35]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[36]  Kai A. Konrad,et al.  Fragmented Property Rights and Incentives for R&D , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[37]  V. Mahajan,et al.  Managing New Product Definition in Highly Dynamic Environments , 1998 .

[38]  J. Gans,et al.  The Product Market and the Market for 'Ideas': Commercialization Strategies for Technology Entrepreneurs , 2002 .

[39]  Randall A. Heron,et al.  Do early birds get the returns? An empirical investigation of early‐mover advantages in acquisitions , 2004 .

[40]  Theo Offerman,et al.  Competitive Bidding in Auctions with Private and Common Values , 2000 .

[41]  B. Tabrizi,et al.  Capturing the real value in high-tech acquisitions. , 1999, Harvard business review.

[42]  Rita Gunther McGrath A Real Options Logic for Initiating Technology Positioning Investments , 1997 .

[43]  T. Mantecón An Analysis of the Implications of Uncertainty and Agency Problems on the Wealth Effects to Acquirers of Private Firms , 2008 .

[44]  Kamalini Ramdas,et al.  Up or Out—or Stay Put? Product Positioning in an Evolving Technology Environment , 2009 .

[45]  R. Katila,et al.  Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study , 2001 .

[46]  David H. Hsu,et al.  PATENTS AS QUALITY SIGNALS FOR ENTREPRENEURIAL VENTURES. , 2008 .

[47]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Rush and Be Wrong or Wait and Be Late? A Model of Information in Collaborative Processes , 2005 .

[48]  René M. Stulz,et al.  Firm size and the gains from acquisitions , 2004 .

[49]  K. B. Hendricks,et al.  Delays in new product introductions and the market value of the firm: the consequences of being late to the market , 1997 .

[50]  James F. Fairbank,et al.  Managing Uncertainty in a Formal Standards-Based Industry: A Real Options Perspective on Acquisition Timing , 2006 .

[51]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[52]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Valuing R&D Projects in a Portfolio: Evidence from the Pharmaceutical Industry , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[53]  Matthew J. Higgins,et al.  The outsourcing of R&D through acquisitions in the pharmaceutical industry , 2006 .

[54]  Markus K. Brunnermeier,et al.  Hedge Funds and the Technology Bubble , 2003 .

[55]  T. Moeller Let's make a deal! How shareholder control impacts merger payoffs , 2005 .

[56]  Mathew L. A. Hayward When do firms learn from their acquisition experience? Evidence from 1990 to 1995 , 2002 .

[57]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Holistic Customer Requirements and the Design-Select Decision , 1999 .

[58]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  Event Studies In Management Research: Theoretical And Empirical Issues , 1997 .

[59]  B. Lambrecht,et al.  The Timing and Terms of Mergers Motivated by Economies of Scale , 2003 .

[60]  Ming Ding,et al.  Structuring the New Product Development Pipeline , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[61]  D.,et al.  Regression Models and Life-Tables , 2022 .

[62]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Organizing for Innovation: Managing the Coordination-Autonomy Dilemma in Technology Acquisitions , 2006 .